| Literature DB >> 32932603 |
Shikai Lv1, Huan Guo1, Min Zhang1, Qiaohui Wang1, Hong Zhang1, Wanquan Ji1,2.
Abstract
The NAM, ATAF1/2, and CUC2 (NAC) transcription factors (TFs) constitute the largest plant-specific TF superfamily, and play important roles in various physiological processes, including stress responses. Stripe rust and powdery mildew are the most damaging of the fungal diseases that afflict wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). However, studies on Triticum aestivum NAC (TaNAC)s' role in resistance to the two diseases are still limited, especially in an overall comparative analysis of TaNACs responding or not to fungal stress. In the present study, 186 TaNAC transcripts were obtained from the resistant hexaploid wheat line N9134 under fungal stress, and 180 new transcripts were submitted to GenBank. Statistical results show that 35.1% (54/154) of TaNAC genes responded to stripe rust and powdery mildew in the seedling stage. "Abnormal" coding transcripts of differentially expressed (DE)-TaNAC genes in wheat responding to fungal stress were found in a significantly higher proportion (24/117 vs. 8/69, p = 0.0098) than in non-DE-NACs. This hinted that the alternative splicing of TaNAC genes was active in transcriptional or post-transcriptional regulation during plant-pathogen interactions. Full-length NAC proteins were classified into nine groups via phylogenetic analysis. Multiple-sequence alignment revealed diversity in the C-terminal structural organization, but the differentially expressed gene (DEG)-encoding proteins enriched in Subgroups VI and VII were conserved, with WV[L/V]CR amino acid residues in Motif 7 following the NAM domain. Our data that showed TaNAC TFs responded to fungal disease, which was affected by expression levels and by the regulation of multifarious transcript variants. These data for TaNAC responses to stripe rust and/or powdery mildew and their numerous structural variants provide a good resource for NAC function-mechanism analysis in the context of biotic-stress tolerance in wheat.Entities:
Keywords: TaNAC; alternative splicing; cloning; comparative analysis; powdery mildew; stripe rust; structural variants; wheat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32932603 PMCID: PMC7564338 DOI: 10.3390/genes11091073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Conserved-domain classification of 559 high-quality Triticum aestivum NAC (TaNAC) transcripts identified from IWGSC RefSeq v1.1.
| Number | Gene Names | Types |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | TraesCS5A02G271500.1, TraesCS5B02G271800.1, TraesCS5D02G279100.1 | No domain |
| 8 | TraesCS2A02G326600.3, TraesCS2D02G101300.1, TraesCS2D02G336300.2, TraesCS4A02G213100.1, TraesCS5B02G480900.1, TraesCS5D02G481200.2, TraesCS6D02G266000.1, TraesCS7A02G152400.1 | One short NAM domain |
| 1 | TraesCS1D02G004800.1 | One normal NAM, one DnaJ, and one ZnF_BED domains |
| 1 | TraesCS7B02G461700.1 | One normal NAM domain and two AA_Kinase domains |
| 8 | TraesCS2A02G328100.1, TraesCS2A02G363700.1, TraesCS2B02G381700.1, TraesCS2D02G334800.1, TraesCS2D02G361500.1, TraesCS3A02G269900.1, TraesCS3B02G303800.1, TraesCS3D02G269600.1 | Two normal NAM domains |
| 1 | TraesCS2A02G326600.2 | One normal NAM domain and one signal peptide in N-terminal |
| 537 | All other transcripts | One normal NAM Domain |
Figure 1Distribution of differentially expressed (DE) Triticum aestivum NAC (TaNAC) unigenes under stress from stripe rust and powdery mildew.
Figure 2Expression heat map of 25 selected TaNAC genes under stress due to stripe rust or powdery mildew. (a) Pst treatment; (b) Bgt treatment. (left) Expression determined by RNA-seq, and values represent fold change of average reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped (RPKM) across three replicate samples; (right) expression of corresponding TaNAC genes according to qRT-PCR, and value is relative expression calculated using 2−ΔΔCt. S: stripe-rust stress; P: powdery-mildew stress; 0, 24 h, etc.: time interval between sampling and inoculation. Group I contained genes that were differentially expressed under both Pst and Bgt stress. (a) Group II contained genes that were non-DE under Pst stress, but DE under Bgt stress; (b) Group II contained genes that were non-DE under Bgt stress, but DE under Pst stress; genes in Group II were determined to be DE under all fungal stress. Group III contained genes that were non-DE under both Pst and Bgt stress. Notes: TaNAC015_3A and TaNAC020_2A, marked in green in Figure 2a, were upregulated both in RNA-seq and qRT-PCR but with inconsistent expression patterns; TaNAC001_7A, marked in yellow in Figure 2a, was upregulated in RNA-seq and downregulated in qRT-PCR, but with consistent expression patterns; TaNAC047_7D, marked in red in Figure 2b, was upregulated in RNA-seq and downregulated in qRT-PCR, and with inconsistent expression patterns. The four sets of comparison result above showed no change in DE classification attribute. Six other sets of comparison results, marked in blue—namely TaNAC018_7B and TaNAC024_3A in Figure 2a, and TaNAC006_3A, TaNAC018_7B, TaNAC020_2A, and TaNAC001_7A in Figure 2b—were non-DE in RNA-seq but DE in qRT-PCR, or the opposite. They all showed inconsistent expression patterns. However, upon combining the two sets of RNA-seq and qRT-PCR comparison results between Pst stress and Bgt stress, respectively, there was no change in DE classification attribute under fungal stress for any gene. In addition, only TaNAC013_3A.1, marked with a red star, showed a changed classification attribute from non-DE in RNA-seq to DE in qRT-PCR, with inconsistency of specific expression patterns under fungal stress.
Figure 3Structural patterns of 16 different transcripts from three TaNAC genes selected for description. (a) TaNAC017_5A corresponded to TraesCS5A02G271500, which was located on chr5A|481900414-481904347|. Open reading frames (ORFs) of TaNAC017_5A.1 and TaNAC017_5A.2 only had multiple single-nucleotide variations (SNVs). Four other transcripts were formed by deletion in the exon region. (b) TaNAC017_5D corresponded to TraesCS5D02G279100, which was located on chr5D|381032432-381036997|. TaNAC017_5D.2 could perfectly match TraesCS5D02G279100. TaNAC017_5D.1 had two SNVs in different loci with TaNAC017_5D.2. One SNV and a deletion of three bases were between TaNAC017_5D.3 and TaNAC017_5D.2. TaNAC017_5D.4 was TraesCS5D02G279100.2, which lacked an intron compared with TaNAC017_5D.2. (c) TaNAC073_3B corresponded to TraesCS3B02G410500, which was located on chr3B|647244571-647252470|.TaNAC073_3B.2 and TaNAC073_3B.3 had the same ORFs as TraesCS3B02G410500.2 and TraesCS3B02G410500.1, respectively; TaNAC073_3B.1 had one SNV with TaNAC073_3B.2; TaNAC073_3B.4 contained an intron, and ORF was divided into two segments; TaNAC073_3B.5 extended 36 bp bases of the following intron sequence after the fourth exon and lacked the last exon; TaNAC073_3B.6 continued to extend its third exon by 13 bp bases in the subsequent intron, which caused premature termination at Position 837 of the coding sequence. Notes: Exact sequence structures, including SNVs and corresponding to the structural pattern, are shown in Supplementary Figure S1. All details of these transcripts are given in Supplementary Table S3.
Conformity test between number of TaNAC transcripts and number of originally selected unigenes, including those classified as differentially expressed (DE) and non-DE under fungal stress.
| No. | Types | DEG | Non-DEG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Selected unigenes | 28 | 22 | 1.000 |
| 2 | Total transcripts | 117 | 69 | 0.058 |
| 3 | Cloned transcripts | 101 | 66 | 0.244 |
| 4 | Assembly transcripts | 9 | 2 | 0.085 |
| 5 | Transcripts from assembly and IWGSC | 7 | 1 | 0.073 |
| 6 | Normal encoded transcripts | 93 | 61 | 0.272 |
| 7 | Cloned and normal encoded transcripts | 78 | 59 | 0.826 |
| 8 | Abnormal encoded transcripts | 24 | 8 | 0.030 * |
| 9 | Cloned and abnormal encoded transcripts | 23 | 7 | 0.023 * |
Note: DEG: differentially expressed gene; p-values from chi-squared test calculated using ratio of DEG and non-DEG between each group and selected unigenes; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4Phylogenetic classification, conserved domain pattern, and conserved motifs of 48 selected TaNAC transcription factors. (a) Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree. Twenty-seven transcripts with red dots are from DEGs, others from non-DEG. Three transcripts with black pentagons were extracted from IWGSC RefSeq v1.1, and remaining 45 were cloned. (b) Domain patterns. For the sake of clarity, each sequence was truncated at different positions. (c) Motif patterns obtained using the Multiple Expectation Maximization for Motif Elicitation (MEME) suite. Sequence logos of Motifs 1–11 (except Motif 9) that had ≥5 sites shown in Supplementary Figure S2.
Conformity test between number of TaNAC transcripts with transmembrane motifs and number of originally selected unigenes according to classification as DE/non-DE under fungal stress.
| Sequence Types | DEG | Non-DEG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selected unigenes from N9134 | 28 | 22 | 1.000 |
| Transcripts with transmembrane motifs obtained from N9134 | 12 | 7 | 0.530 |
| Transcripts with transmembrane motifs cloned from N9134 | 9 | 7 | 0.984 |
Note: p-values from chi-squared test calculated using ratio of DEGs to non-DEGs between each group and selected unigenes. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Conformity test between number of TaNAC transcripts with or without transmembrane motifs in N9134 and that in IWGSC RefSeq v1.1.
| Transcript Types | With Transmembrane Motifs | Without Transmembrane Motifs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcripts from IWGSC RefSeq v1.1 | 36 | 523 | 1.000 |
| Total normal encoded transcripts from N9134 | 19 | 135 | 0.003 ** |
| Cloned and normal encoded transcripts from N9134 | 16 | 121 | 0.012 * |
Note: p-values from chi-squared test calculated using ratio of transcripts with/without transmembrane motifs between each group and that from IWGSC RefSeq v1.1. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.