The propagation of economic impacts through supply chains: The case of a mega-city lockdown to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

This study quantifies the economic effect of a possible lockdown of Tokyo to prevent the spread of COVID-19. The negative effect of such a lockdown may propagate to other regions through supply chains because of supply and demand shortages. Applying an agent-based model to the actual supply chains of nearly 1.6 million firms in Japan, we simulate what would happen to production activities outside Tokyo if production activities that are not essential to citizens' survival in Tokyo were shut down for a certain period. We find that if Tokyo were locked down for a month, the indirect effect on other regions would be twice as large as the direct effect on Tokyo, leading to a total production loss of 27 trillion yen in Japan or 5.2% of the country's annual GDP. Although the production that would be shut down in Tokyo accounts for 21% of the total production in Japan, the lockdown would result in an 86% reduction of the daily production in Japan after one month.

Introduction

COVID-19, a novel coronavirus disease, has been spreading worldwide. By March 31, 2020, the total number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 reached 775,306, whereas the total number of deaths was 37,083 [1]. To prevent the spread of COVID-19, most countries have implemented unprecedentedly stringent restrictions, such as a shutdown of national borders, limits on public gatherings, and closures of schools, shops, and restaurants.

In some cases, whole cities and regions have been locked down. For example, Wuhan, the epicenter of the novel coronavirus, was locked down from January 23 to March 27, 2020, including the closure of all public transport and all companies not essential to citizens’ survival, including manufacturing plants, for most of the period (Reuters, March 11, 2020). Apparently, the lockdown heavily affected Wuhan’s economy and its population of 11 million people. Moreover, because Wuhan, known as one of China’s “Detroits”, is a center of the automobile industry and supplies parts and components of automobiles to domestic and foreign plants, the effect of the lockdown propagated to other regions of China and other countries through supply chains. For example, Honda, a Japanese automobile manufacturer that operates plants in Wuhan, reduced the production of automobiles in Japan due to a lack of supplies of parts from China in early March 2020 (Nikkei Newspaper, March 2, 2020).

Recently, many studies have empirically confirmed that economic shocks propagate across regions and countries through supply chains. Some studies applying econometric analysis to firm-level data show that firms linked with suppliers and customers in areas affected by natural disasters exhibit decreased performance [2-5]. Several others have estimated economic impacts of the spread of COVID-19, incorporating propagation through input-output linkages across sectors and countries /citeOECD2020, McKibbin2020, Bonadio2020, Guan2020, McCann2020. For example, McKibbin and Fernando [6] use a hybrid of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models and computable general equilibrium (CGE) models assuming international and inter-sectoral input-output (IO) linkages and estimate the effect of the spread of COVID-19 on the world GDP. Guan and others /citeGuan2020 utilize international IO tables at the country-sector level and estimate impacts of lockdowns of heavily infected countries on production in the world economy. According to their estimates, if Europe and the United States imposed a lockdown strategy with a strictness measure of 80% (i.e., 80% of production in most non-essential sectors are shut down) for 2 months, the world value added would decline by 27%.

By contrast, Inoue and Todo [7] apply firm-level data for the actual supply chains in Japan, rather than inter-sectoral IO tables, to an agent-based model to simulate the production trajectory after the Great East Japan earthquake in 2011. Their results indicate that the propagation effect of an economic shock through supply chains was substantially larger than the direct effect of the earthquake. Inoue and Todo [7] also show that complex network characteristics of supply chains, such as scale-free properties and complex loops, aggravate the propagation effect. Without any network complexity, i.e., if they assume no firm-level inter-linkages but only inter-industry linkages or assume a randomly determined network with no complexity, they find that the propagation effect is quite small.

The analytical framework of Inoue and Todo [7] has several advantages. First, although some studies quantitatively find that supply chains are equipped with complex network characteristics /citeborgatti2009social, battini2007towards, Fujiwara10, they do not examine propagation of shocks through supply chains. Second, the conclusion of Inoue and Todo [7] that the structure of networks significantly influences propagation is consistent with recent findings in the network science literature [8-13]. For example, diffusion is generally promoted when the degree distribution follows a power law and, hence, there are several hub nodes with a large number of links. In such a network, when a shock reaches a hub node, it spreads quickly to many others. Third, although the econometric analysis of /citeBarrot2016, Boehm2019, Carvalho2016, Kashiwagi2018 quantitatively confirms propagation through supply chains, their analysis cannot estimate the total effect of a shock that can be obtained from the framework of Inoue and Todo [7]. Finally, the studies estimating the effect of COVID-19 rely on either a macroeconomic econometric model at the country level [14] or a general equilibrium model assuming international and inter-sectoral IO linkages [6, 15–17] and thus do not incorporate complex inter-firm linkages. As a result, the estimates of the previous studies may be largely undervalued, as suggested by the findings of Inoue and Todo [7].

Therefore, this study utilizes the framework of Inoue and Todo [7] and examines propagation of the economic effect of lockdown of a city to prevent the spread of COVID-19 to other regions through supply chains. In particular, when a large industrial city connected with other regions through supply chains in a complex manner is locked down, the propagation effect may be quite large. Therefore, we focus on the economic effect of a lockdown of Tokyo on other regions. Specifically, by applying the agent-based model developed in Inoue and Todo [7] to actual supply-chain linkages of approximately 1.6 million firms in Japan, we simulate what would happen to production activities outside Tokyo if Tokyo were locked down or non-essential production activities in Tokyo were shut down for a certain period. Tokyo is an appropriate case for the purpose of this study because it is one of the largest cities in the world and a hub for global supply chains and was, in fact, locked down in April and May 2020. Using this framework, we can obtain a reasonable estimate of the propagation effect of lockdown across regions that cannot be computed from other studies using econometric approaches or IO tables and thus can highlight the impact of the propagation through supply chains.

Data

The data used in this study are taken from the Company Information Database and Company Linkage Database collected by Tokyo Shoko Research (TSR), one of the largest credit research companies in Japan. The former includes information about the attributes of each firm, including the location, the industry, the sales, and the number of employees, whereas the latter includes major customers and suppliers of each firm. Because of data availability, we utilize data for firm attributes and supply chains in 2016. The number of firms in the data is 1,668,567, and the number of supply chain links is 5,943,073. That is, our data identify major supply chains of most firms in Japan, although they lack information about supply chain links with foreign entities. Because the transaction value of each supply chain tie is not available in the data, we estimate sales from a particular supplier to each of its customers and consumers using the total sales of the supplier and its customers and the input-output (IO) tables for Japan for 2015. In this estimation process, we must drop firms without any sales information. Accordingly, the number of firms in our further analysis is 966,627, and the number of links is 3,544,343. Although firms in the TSR data are classified into 1,460 industries according to the Japan Standard Industrial Classification, we simplify them into 187 industries classified in the IO tables. S1 Appendix provides details of the data construction process.

In the supply chain data described above, the degree, or the number of links, of firms follows a power-law distribution (see S1 Fig), as often found in the literature [12]. The average path length between firms, or the number of steps between them through supply chains, is 4.8. This small average path length indicates that the supply chains have a small-world property, i.e., firms are indirectly and closely connected through supply chains. Therefore, we would predict that economic shocks quickly propagate through the supply chains. Using the same dataset, previous studies [7, 18] find that 46-48% of firms are included in the giant strongly connected component (GSCC), in which all firms are indirectly connected to each other through supply chains. The large size of the GSCC prominently shows that the network has numerous cycles and a complex nature, which is unlike the common image of a layered supply chain structure.

Method

Model

Our simulation employs the dynamic agent-based model of Inoue and Todo [7, 19], an extension of the model of Hallegatte [20] that assumes supply chains at the firm level. In the model, each firm utilizes inputs purchased from other firms to produce an output and sells it to other firms and consumers. Supply chains are predetermined and do not change over time in the following two respects. First, each firm utilizes a firm-specific set of input varieties and does not change the input set over time. The variety of inputs is determined by the industry of the producer, and hence, firms in the same industry are assumed to produce the same output. Second, each firm is linked with fixed suppliers and customers and cannot be linked with any new firm over time. Furthermore, we assume that each firm keeps inventories of each input at a level randomly determined from the Poisson distribution. Following Inoue and Todo [7], in which parameter values are calibrated from the case of the Great East Japan earthquake, we assume that firms aim to keep inventories for nine days of production on average.

When a lockdown directly or indirectly causes a reduction in the production of particular firms, the supply of products of these firms to their customer firms declines. Then, one way for customer firms to maintain the current level of production is to use their inventories of inputs. Alternatively, customers can procure input from their other suppliers in the same industry already connected prior to the lockdown if these suppliers have additional production capacity. If the inventories and inputs from substitute suppliers are insufficient, customers have to reduce their production because of a shortage of inputs. In addition, suppliers of the firms directly affected by the lockdown may have to reduce production because of the reduction of demand from affected customers. Accordingly, the economic shock propagates both downstream and upstream through supply chains. S2 Appendix provides the details of the model.

Simulation procedure

In the simulation, we assume an extreme case of Tokyo’s lockdown where all production activities that are not essential to citizens’ survival (hereafter referred to as non-essential production activities) in the central part of Tokyo (23 wards, hereafter simply referred to as Tokyo) are shut down for either one day, one week, two weeks, one month, or two months. Essential production activities are defined as those in the wholesale, retail, utility, transport, storage, communication, healthcare, and welfare sectors (see S3 Appendix for details). After the lockdown period, all sectors immediately resume production at the same level as in the pre-lockdown period. Because the inventory target of each firm is randomly sampled from the Poisson distribution (see S2 Appendix), we run thirty simulations with different sets of inventory targets of firms for each lockdown duration and average over the thirty sets of results.

It should be noted that our assumption does not exactly match the experience of Japan. In practice, the Japanese government announced the state of emergency for some prefectures including Tokyo from April 7 to May 25, 2020, and for the whole country from April 16 to May 14. According to the Act on Special Measures for Pandemic Influenza and New Infectious Diseases Preparedness and Response, the Japanese government can declare a state of emergency if the spread of a infectious disease, such as COVID-19, is rapid and nationwide. In the state of emergency, some economic activities were requested to be closed, and people were requested to reduce their contacts with others by 80%. Although there was no legal punishment for disobeying the requests, strong social pressure in Japan led people and businesses to voluntarily restrict their activities to a large extent. As a result, production activities including those in sectors not officially restricted were reported to shrink substantially (Mainichi Newspaper, May 27, 2020). Because it is still unclear to what extent economic activities shrank, we assume a complete shutdown of non-essential production activities. In addition, to highlight the propagation of the effect of a lockdown of a mega-city to other regions, we focus on a lockdown of Tokyo, rather than the entire economy.

Results

Benchmark results

When Tokyo is locked down, the value-added production of Tokyo immediately becomes almost zero. Because the daily production of non-essential sectors in Tokyo is estimated to be 309 billion yen, or approximately 2.9 billion US dollars, the total direct loss of production in Tokyo due to the lockdown is 309 billion yen multiplied by the number of days of the lockdown period. Table 1 shows the direct production loss in Tokyo for each case in the second column. In addition, the third column shows the production loss outside Tokyo (which includes essential sectors in Tokyo; hereafter, this area is simply called outside Tokyo), which is the propagation effect through supply chains. The indirect loss is calculated from a total loss less the direct damage over the duration of the lockdown and the following three weeks. As shown in Fig 1, after the three weeks, the production fully recovers. The total loss is the total gap between the pre-lockdown daily production and the current daily production. The results in Table 1 are the averages of the simulations.

Table 1

The loss of value added because of Tokyo lockdowns.

This table shows the results from the simulations assuming the shutdown of all non-essential production activities. These results are based on the average of the simulations. (Unit: trillion yen).

	Direct effect on Tokyo	Indirect effect on other regions in Japan	Total effect (% of GDP)
1 day	0.309	0.252	0.561 (0.106)
1 week	2.17	1.54	3.70 (0.699)
2 weeks	4.33	4.92	9.25 (1.75)
1 month	9.28	18.4	27.6 (5.22)
2 months	18.6	49.5	68.1 (12.8)

Fig 1

The dynamics of daily value added in Japan after the lockdown of Tokyo.

Each line shows the average of thirty simulations in which firms have inventory sizes sampled from the Poisson distribution. The dotted lines show the standard deviations. This figure shows simulation results assuming the shutdown of all non-essential production activities.

The results indicate that when Tokyo is locked down for only one day, the production loss outside Tokyo, though not locked down, is already 252 billion yen, 82% of the production loss in Tokyo. When the lockdown continues for a month, the indirect effect on other regions is twice as large as the direct effect on Tokyo, and the estimated total production loss is 27.6 trillion yen, or 5.22% of the annual GDP. In Fig 1, each line shows the dynamics of the total daily value added in Japan in each case assuming different lockdown durations. When the lockdown continues for a month, the daily value added of Japan becomes only approximately one-seventh of that before the lockdown. This result implies that even when the initial production loss in Tokyo is small, its propagation effect on other regions can become large as the lockdown continues.

Fig 2 shows temporal and geographical visualizations of the simulation of a lockdown. A video of the visualization is available (see S1 Video). The reductions in firm production are averaged in municipalities. The red areas indicate that the production in the area is less than or equal to 20% of firms’ capacity on average, whereas the light red and orange areas show firms with a more moderate decline in production. The left figure illustrates that a non-negligible number of areas (firms) distant from Tokyo are already affected on the first day of the lockdown. Two weeks later, affected areas spread throughout the country, as shown in the right figure. These visualizations indicate that the indirect effect propagates geographically as the lockdown is prolonged.

Fig 2

Temporal and geographical visualizations of the reduction in production.

The left and right panels show the first day and the first 2 weeks of the lockdown, respectively. The reductions are aggregated and averaged over firms in municipalities. The red areas, for example, indicate firms in the areas whose actual production is substantially (more than 80%) smaller than their capacity before the lockdown on average.

Alternative specifications

In addition to the benchmark simulations above, we experiment with three alternative sets of simulations. First, we assume that all production activities including essential activities are shut down. Then, the daily production loss in Tokyo is 471 billion yen, 52% larger than that in the benchmark simulations (309 billion yen). However, we find that the total production loss in Japan from a lockdown of Tokyo for a month is 31.1 trillion yen, only 13% larger than that in the benchmark (27.6 trillion yen) (see S1 Table for details).

Second, we assume that industrial demand is prioritized over consumer demand so that production activities outside Tokyo will be less affected. For example, computers can be used both by customer firms for production and citizens for consumption. In the benchmark simulation, when the output of a product is not sufficient because of a lockdown, we assume that the limited output is rationed to customer firms and consumers based on their relative demand prior to the lockdown. However, in this alternative simulation, customer firms are prioritized to maximize production in downstream firms (see S2 Appendix for details). Then, we find that a one-month lockdown results in a production loss in Japan of 27.0 trillion yen. Because the production loss does not substantially change from the benchmark result (27.6 trillion yen), we conclude that industry prioritization is not very effective in alleviating the propagation effect of a lockdown.

Finally, we investigate the assumption of a moderate initial shock. Since we only know the addresses of the firms’ headquarters, we assign each firm to each headquarters’ location in the benchmark and the above alternatives. However, even if the headquarters of a firm is located in Tokyo, other business establishments and factories may continue to operate (however, it may not be possible to obtain such detailed trade information between business establishments and factories). To take this situation into consideration, we proportionally assign the production loss to firms that have headquarters in Tokyo based on the number of headquarters (i.e., counted individually), business establishments, and factories in Tokyo over the number in all areas. This setting may be the other side of the extremely mitigated condition because if the headquarters are closed, the other business establishments and factories probably cannot operate at full capacity. Obviously, this assumption shows a much smaller direct shock (107 billion yen per day) than the benchmark shock (309 billion yen per day). However, if the lockdown is prolonged for a month, the total loss is 22.5 trillion yen, a difference of 5.10 trillion yen from the benchmark. We conclude that this difference is not large enough to change the interpretations of the benchmark results.

Discussion and conclusion

The simulation results clearly show that the effect of a lockdown of Tokyo quickly propagates to other regions outside Tokyo, leading to a substantial effect on the entire Japanese economy. This conclusion is consistent with the previous finding that economic shocks due to natural disasters propagate to non-disaster regions and result in a large total loss /citeInoue2019. Although the production of non-essential sectors in Tokyo accounts for 21.3% of the total production in Japan, a lockdown of Tokyo for a month would result in a reduction of the daily production in Japan of 86%, or 1.25 trillion yen.

In addition, the effect on other regions becomes progressively larger as the duration of the lockdown becomes longer: when the duration doubles, the production loss more than doubles. In the case of a lockdown for one day, the total loss of value added outside Tokyo is 82% of the loss in Tokyo. However, when the lockdown continues for a month, the loss outside Tokyo is twice as large as the loss in Tokyo. This result implies that the effect of a longer lockdown can reach firms that are “farther” from Tokyo along supply chains in terms of the network.

To alleviate the propagation effect through supply chains, one could limit the shutdown of production activities or prioritize producers’ use of goods and services over consumers’ use. However, our results indicate that these measures would not work well, particularly when the duration of a lockdown is long.

Our analysis provides several policy implications. First, because the overall effect of a lockdown of a mega-city on the entire economy is extremely large when we take into account its propagation effect through supply chains, lockdowns should be considered a measure of last resort. Instead, the spread of COVID-19 should be prevented earlier using other means and any lockdown of a mega-city should be avoided. Second, because the total effect of a lockdown progressively increases with its duration, a mega-city lockdown, if it cannot be avoided, should be as short as possible. Policymakers should be aware that policies to alleviate the propagation effect may not work when the lockdown duration is long.

Several caveats of this study should be mentioned. First, we assume that firms cannot find any new suppliers when supplies from their suppliers in Tokyo are disrupted. Second, for simplicity, the model assumes that even service sectors have the inventory mechanism. Finally, the model in this study only considers the dynamics of production and ignores possible changes in prices and wages incorporated in the literature [21, 22]. These assumptions may be too strong, leading to an overestimation of the propagation effect. However, our main result that the propagation effect is substantial would hold.

This research was conducted as part of a project entitled ‘‘Dynamics of Economy and Finance from the Economic Network Point of View,’’ undertaken at the Research Institute of Economy, Trade, and Industry (RIETI). This research was also supported by MEXT under the Exploratory Challenges on Post-K Computers Program (Studies of Multi-level Spatiotemporal Simulation of Socioeconomic Phenomena, Macroeconomic Simulations). This research used computational resources of the K computer provided by the RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science through the HPCI System Research project (Project ID: hp190148). The authors thank seminar participants at RIETI.

Data [23].

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.

Model.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.

Definition of essential industries.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.

Degree distribution of supply chains in Japan.

(PNG)

Click here for additional data file.

Overview of the agent-based model.

Products flow from left to right, whereas orders flow in the opposite direction. The equation numbers correspond to those in S2 Appendix.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

(PNG)

Click here for additional data file.

The address of the video is https://youtu.be/-WTg4pWc9HI.

(TXT)

Click here for additional data file.

Results from Alternative Specifications: The loss of value added because of a Tokyo lockdown according to alternative specifications.

(Unit: trillion yen).

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.

27 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-16047

The Propagation of the Economic Impact through Supply Chains: The Case of a Mega-City Lockdown against the Spread of COVID-19

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Inoue,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Authors have provided a theoretically rigorous framework to analyze the influence that COVID-10 brought to the world. Two peer reviewers suggest that further modification and supplement are necessary before fully acception by PLOS ONE, and I hold the same view.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 10 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Lizhi Xing, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

3. We note that Figure 2 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

3.1.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 2 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

3.2.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

4. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 3 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

5. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 2 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The Paper is written in well mannered. In introduction section, author (s) are requested to explain the pinpoint background and the objective of the research. This leads to a greater interest by the reader.

Literature review section is not enough to describe the research problem. Author (s) are requested to provide strong literature for present research.

The conclusions should show the novel results with the past situation research for this authors are advices to include the general findings of the research. It is advisable to provide the limitation of this research in a very concise manner.

The overall work done by the author is good.

Reviewer #2: This paper aims to quantify the economic effect of a possible lockdown of Tokyo to prevent the spread of COVID-19 by applying an agent-based model with the actual supply chains of nearly 1.6 million firms in Japan, which is a hot topic and provides a relatively quality paper. Especially in 2020, COVID-19 produces dramatically negative effect on global supply chain and many scholars pay more attention to that. There are some minor comments for the authors.

1. As we know, supply chains whether in a country or in the world is a network. Using network quantitative method to explore supply chains is also a major way. This paper employs the dynamic agent-based model of Inoue and Todo that is an extension of the model of Hallegatte, I would like to see the authors spend more time to introduce the differences between the method mentioned in the paper and network quantitative method.

2. COVID-19 likes a kind of shock or emergency and many scholars have studied policy shock and public emergency bring about impact on economic or social development, so the author need to show relative literatures published to deeply illustrate the paper’s highlights.

3. This study attempts to quantify the economic effect of COVID-19 by taking into account the propagation effect across regions through inter-firm supply chains, why does this paper choose firm-level data? I don’t quite clear to see the main contributions at the end of the introduction.

4. Please explain further what does Lockdown means and what the actual prerequisites of Lockdown are?

5. I would like to see the process of how to match firm-level data with IO industry-level data?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Submitted filename: Comment_POS.docx

Click here for additional data file.

27 Aug 2020

Please find the attached "Response.pdf."

Submitted filename: response.pdf

Click here for additional data file.

3 Sep 2020

The propagation of economic impacts through supply chains: The case of a mega-city lockdown to prevent the spread of COVID-19

PONE-D-20-16047R1

Dear Dr. Inoue,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Lizhi Xing, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

7 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-16047R1

The propagation of economic impacts through supply chains:The case of a mega-city lockdown to prevent the spread ofCOVID-19

Dear Dr. Inoue:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Lizhi Xing

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE