Literature DB >> 32930924

Acceptability of online exercise-based interventions after breast cancer surgery: systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Mariya B Sotirova1, Eilís M McCaughan2, Lucia Ramsey3, Carrie Flannagan2, Daniel P Kerr3, Sean R O'Connor4, Nicole E Blackburn3, Iseult M Wilson5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: eHealth and mHealth approaches are increasingly used to support cancer survivors. This review aimed to examine adherence, acceptability and satisfaction with Internet-based self-management programmes for post-surgical cancer rehabilitation and to identify common components of such interventions.
METHODS: Nine electronic databases were searched from inception up to February 15, 2020, for relevant quantitative and qualitative studies evaluating Internet-based cancer rehabilitation interventions. Studies were required to include an exercise or physical activity-based self-management intervention and a measure of adherence, acceptability or user satisfaction with the programme. Two independent reviewers performed all data extraction and quality assessment procedures. Data were synthesized using a narrative approach.
RESULTS: Six hundred ninety-six potential papers were identified and screened. Eleven met the inclusion criteria. Interventions had wide variations in levels of adherence, but the majority were reported as being acceptable to the users. Increased acceptability and user satisfaction were associated with interventions which were seen as time and cost-efficient, requiring acquisition of minimal or no new skills, which used coherent language, or which provided tailored information. The majority contained behaviour change components such as goal setting.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite high levels of heterogeneity between studies, Internet-based approaches may be an acceptable method for the delivery of self-management interventions in post-surgical cancer rehabilitation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: There is a need for further studies exploring factors associated with increased user engagement and usage of digital interventions in cancer rehabilitation settings. These findings should be used to help develop interventions prior to testing their effectiveness in adequately powered randomized controlled trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Cancer; Exercise; Internet; Rehabilitation; Surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32930924      PMCID: PMC7966228          DOI: 10.1007/s11764-020-00931-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Surviv        ISSN: 1932-2259            Impact factor:   4.442


  44 in total

Review 1.  Intention-to-treat principle.

Authors:  V M Montori; G H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The underestimated role of psychological and rehabilitation approaches for management of cancer pain. A brief commentary.

Authors:  Marco Cascella; Nicholas Simonds Thompson; Maria Rosaria Muzio; Cira Antonietta Forte; Arturo Cuomo
Journal:  Recenti Prog Med       Date:  2016-08

Review 3.  Effects of web-based interventions on cancer patients' symptoms: review of randomized trials.

Authors:  N Fridriksdottir; S Gunnarsdottir; S Zoëga; B Ingadottir; E J G Hafsteinsdottir
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Cancer patients' needs for rehabilitation services.

Authors:  Lene Thorsen; Gunhild M Gjerset; Jon Håvard Loge; Cecilie E Kiserud; Eva Skovlund; Tone Fløtten; Sophie D Fosså
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 5.  Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material.

Authors:  E S Nilsen; H T Myrhaug; M Johansen; S Oliver; A D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

Review 6.  The effects of Internet or interactive computer-based patient education in the field of breast cancer: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Anne M Ryhänen; Mervi Siekkinen; Sirkku Rankinen; Heikki Korvenranta; Helena Leino-Kilpi
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-09-09

7.  Guided online self-management interventions in primary care: a survey on use, facilitators, and barriers.

Authors:  Rosalie van der Vaart; Vera Atema; Andrea W M Evers
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 8.  Internet-Delivered Health Interventions That Work: Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses and Evaluation of Website Availability.

Authors:  Mary Am Rogers; Kelsey Lemmen; Rachel Kramer; Jason Mann; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions.

Authors:  Lucy Yardley; Bonnie J Spring; Heleen Riper; Leanne G Morrison; David H Crane; Kristina Curtis; Gina C Merchant; Felix Naughton; Ann Blandford
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Cancer nutrition and rehabilitation-its time has come!

Authors:  M R Chasen; A P Dippenaar
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.677

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care for individuals living with and beyond lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jordan Curry; Michael Patterson; Sarah Greenley; Mark Pearson; Cynthia C Forbes
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Marlena Klaic; Suzanne Kapp; Peter Hudson; Wendy Chapman; Linda Denehy; David Story; Jill J Francis
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Telerehabilitation programmes for patients with cancer and survivors: a protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Yu He; Xiaochai Han; Wenchen Zou; Xuemin Liu; Nianyi Sun; Fenghua Zhou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.