Literature DB >> 21231783

Cancer patients' needs for rehabilitation services.

Lene Thorsen1, Gunhild M Gjerset, Jon Håvard Loge, Cecilie E Kiserud, Eva Skovlund, Tone Fløtten, Sophie D Fosså.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine cancer patients' needs for rehabilitation services and factors associated with such needs, and secondly identify unmet needs for rehabilitation services and related factors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2008 persons aged 25-60 years, diagnosed in 2005/2006 with the ten most prevalent cancers in Norway were identified through the Cancer Registry of Norway. These patients were contacted by their treating hospital receiving a mailed questionnaire. Main outcomes for the present study were measured by two questions assessing a) needs for rehabilitation services and b) rehabilitation services offered/used. For each question seven services were listed; physical therapy, physical training, psychological counseling, consultations with social worker, occupational therapy, supportive group sessions and admittance to a convalescent home. The respondents then rated to what extent they had experienced needs and if they had been offered and used each service. Those who reported need for a service that not had been offered were defined as having unmet need. Associations between demographic, health-related and outcome variables were analyzed by multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: Among the 1 325 respondents, the mean age was 52 years and 70% were women. Sixty-three percent reported need for at least one rehabilitation service. Need for physical therapy was most frequently reported (43%), followed by physical training (34%), psychological counseling (27%), supportive group sessions (24%), admittance to a convalescent home (24%), consultation with social worker (19%) and occupational therapy (6%). Changes in employment status and ongoing or previous chemotherapy were associated with reporting needs for all rehabilitation services. Forty percent reported unmet needs, which most frequently was reported among persons living alone, who had changed their employment status, receiving or had received chemotherapy or reported comorbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority reported need for at least one rehabilitation service, and 40% reported unmet needs. Prospective studies are recommended in order to better understand needs for rehabilitation services, such as needs in relation to time since treatment, extent of disease and treatment intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21231783     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.531050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  31 in total

1.  Utilization of supportive and palliative care services among oncology outpatients at one academic cancer center: determinants of use and barriers to access.

Authors:  Pallavi Kumar; David Casarett; Amy Corcoran; Krupali Desai; Qing Li; Jinbo Chen; Corey Langer; Jun J Mao
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  What are the attitudes and beliefs of oncologists regarding potential cancer rehabilitation in a tertiary cancer center?

Authors:  G J Francis; J B Fu
Journal:  Rehabil Oncol       Date:  2019-10

Review 3.  Involvement of patients with lung and gynecological cancer and their relatives in psychosocial cancer rehabilitation: a narrative review.

Authors:  Bente Hoeck; Loni Ledderer; Helle Ploug Hansen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Rehabilitation referrals and outcomes in the early period after hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  J Laine; A D'Souza; S Siddiqui; O Sayko; R Brazauskas; S M Eickmeyer
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Feasibility of a psychosocial rehabilitation intervention to enhance the involvement of relatives in cancer rehabilitation: pilot study for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Loni Ledderer; Karen la Cour; Ole Mogensen; Erik Jakobsen; René Depont Christensen; Jakob Kragstrup; Helle Ploug Hansen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Practice patterns and perceptions of survivorship care in Canadian genitourinary oncology: A multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Ashraf Almatar; Suzanne Richter; Nafisha Lalani; Jackie L Bender; David Wiljer; Nour Alkazaz; Laura Legere; Manjula Maganti; Srikala S Sridhar; Pamela P Catton; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Development of a risk-screening tool for cancer survivors to participate in unsupervised moderate- to vigorous-intensity exercise: results from a survey study.

Authors:  Justin C Brown; Emily M Ko; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Influence of comorbidity on cancer patients' rehabilitation needs, participation in rehabilitation activities and unmet needs: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lise Vilstrup Holm; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Jakob Kragstrup; Christoffer Johansen; Rene dePont Christensen; Peter Vedsted; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Participation in cancer rehabilitation and unmet needs: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lise Vilstrup Holm; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Christoffer Johansen; Peter Vedsted; Pia Veldt Larsen; Jakob Kragstrup; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  A systematic review of rehabilitation and exercise recommendations in oncology guidelines.

Authors:  Nicole L Stout; Daniel Santa Mina; Kathleen D Lyons; Karen Robb; Julie K Silver
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.