Literature DB >> 32930845

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal cord injury: should all these patients be automatically assigned a Guy's stone score of 4?

Fabio C M Torricelli1, Fabio C Vicentini2,3, Lucas Zanetti4, Rodrigo Perrella3, Giovanni S Marchini2, Alexandre Danilovic2, Carlos A Batagello2, Claudio B Murta3, Joaquim F A Claro3, Miguel Srougi2, William C Nahas2, Eduardo Mazzucchi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the complication and stone-free rates of PCNL in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to evaluate whether this population should be assigned a Guy's stone score (GSS) of 4.
METHODS: A case-control study was conducted, and electronic charts were reviewed to search for patients with SCI, bladder dysfunction, and kidney stones who had undergone PCNL. Control cases were randomly selected from among patients with complete staghorn calculus (GSS = 4).
RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen patients were included. Patients with SCI had a significant shorter operative time (119 vs. 141 min; p = 0.018). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the patients' position, number of renal tracts, bleeding or transfusion rate; however, there was a significantly higher complication rate (23.1% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.009) and a longer hospital stay (5.8 vs. 3.1 days; p = 0.002) among patients with SCI. With regards to the stone-free rate in patients with different grades of GSS patients with SCI who had a GSS of 1 had a stone-free rate of 85.7%, while those with a GSS of 2, 3, or 4 had 50%, 50%, and 31.5%, respectively (p = 0.024). Only patients with a GSS of 4 in the SCI group had outcomes that were similar to those of control patients (31.5% vs. 31.6%).
CONCLUSION: Patients with SCI should not be automatically assigned GSS 4. Stone-free rate is related to stone burden in these patients, although they do show a higher complication rate and a longer hospital stay than non-neurological patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Kidney; Lithotripsy; Urinary calculi

Year:  2020        PMID: 32930845     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03443-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  1 in total

Review 1.  Staghorn renal stones: what the urologist needs to know.

Authors:  Fabio C M Torricelli; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  Consultation of kidney stones: aspects of intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Palle J S Osther; Marianne Brehmer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Double-sheath vacuum suction versus vacuum-assisted sheath minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of large renal stones: single-center experience.

Authors:  Zhong-Hua Wu; Tong-Zu Liu; Xing-Huan Wang; Yong-Zhi Wang; Hang Zheng; Yin-Gao Zhang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy versus Traditional Open Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xingping Xu; Changwei Chen; Yong Tang; Fusheng Wang; Yangsheng Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided low-pressure perfusion mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children aged 1-7 years: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Zhi Qiu; Quan-Bin Guo; Zakir Ablikim; Xu-Wen Shi; Jiang-Jiang Hou; Chang Chen; Mamat Hasanjan; Mamat Akbarjan; Abdukadir Anwar
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.370

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.