Zhong-Hua Wu1, Tong-Zu Liu2, Xing-Huan Wang3, Yong-Zhi Wang1, Hang Zheng1, Yin-Gao Zhang1. 1. Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Donghu Road #169, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China. 2. Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Donghu Road #169, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China. 13971569109@qq.com. 3. Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Donghu Road #169, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China. daydreamwu@qq.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare double-sheath vacuum suction minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (DS-mini-PCNL) with vacuum-assisted mini-PCNL (VS-mini-PCNL) and to better define the potential benefits of DS-mini-PCNL. METHODS: Between July 2019 and May 2020, 117 patients with large radiopaque renal stones underwent mini-PCNL. Of these, 63 underwent DS-mini-PCNL and 54 underwent VS-mini-PCNL. For VS-mini-PCNL, a F20 Y-shaped sheath was used and the oblique arm of the sheath was connected to the vacuum suction. For DS-mini-PCNL, the oblique arm of a F20 Y-shaped sheath (the outer sheath) and a F16 Y-shaped sheath (the inner sheath) was connected to the perfusion inflow and the vacuum suction, respectively. A 550-μm holmium-YAG laser was used for stone fragmentation. RESULTS: Compared with VS-mini-PCNL group, DS-mini-PCNL group had significantly shorter operative time (35.78 ± 7.77 min vs. 44.56 ± 13.19 min; P = 0.000) and significantly lower fever rate (1.6% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.048). It was not significantly different between the two groups despite the higher initial stone-free rate seen for DS-mini-PCNL group relative to VS-mini-PCNL group (87.7% vs. 81.5%, P = 0.346). Auxiliary procedure rates were 4.8% (three patients) in DS-mini-PCNL group and 16.7% (nine patients) in VS-mini-PCNL group, with a significant difference (P = 0.034). The difference in the final stone-free rate between the two groups was rendered insignificant (93.8% vs. 89.1%, P = 0.510). CONCLUSIONS: DS-mini-PCNL is a safe and effective modality for large renal stones, which could increase the efficiency of stone extraction and decrease infectious complications compared with VS-mini-PCNL.
PURPOSE: To compare double-sheath vacuum suction minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (DS-mini-PCNL) with vacuum-assisted mini-PCNL (VS-mini-PCNL) and to better define the potential benefits of DS-mini-PCNL. METHODS: Between July 2019 and May 2020, 117 patients with large radiopaque renal stones underwent mini-PCNL. Of these, 63 underwent DS-mini-PCNL and 54 underwent VS-mini-PCNL. For VS-mini-PCNL, a F20 Y-shaped sheath was used and the oblique arm of the sheath was connected to the vacuum suction. For DS-mini-PCNL, the oblique arm of a F20 Y-shaped sheath (the outer sheath) and a F16 Y-shaped sheath (the inner sheath) was connected to the perfusion inflow and the vacuum suction, respectively. A 550-μm holmium-YAG laser was used for stone fragmentation. RESULTS: Compared with VS-mini-PCNL group, DS-mini-PCNL group had significantly shorter operative time (35.78 ± 7.77 min vs. 44.56 ± 13.19 min; P = 0.000) and significantly lower fever rate (1.6% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.048). It was not significantly different between the two groups despite the higher initial stone-free rate seen for DS-mini-PCNL group relative to VS-mini-PCNL group (87.7% vs. 81.5%, P = 0.346). Auxiliary procedure rates were 4.8% (three patients) in DS-mini-PCNL group and 16.7% (nine patients) in VS-mini-PCNL group, with a significant difference (P = 0.034). The difference in the final stone-free rate between the two groups was rendered insignificant (93.8% vs. 89.1%, P = 0.510). CONCLUSIONS: DS-mini-PCNL is a safe and effective modality for large renal stones, which could increase the efficiency of stone extraction and decrease infectious complications compared with VS-mini-PCNL.
Authors: Christian Seitz; Mahesh Desai; Axel Häcker; Oliver W Hakenberg; Evangelos Liatsikos; Udo Nagele; David Tolley Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Akito Yamaguchi; Andreas Skolarikos; Niels-Peter Noor Buchholz; Gonzalo Bueno Chomón; Michael Grasso; Pietro Saba; Stephen Nakada; Jean de la Rosette Journal: J Endourol Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Khurshid R Ghani; Sero Andonian; Matthew Bultitude; Mihir Desai; Guido Giusti; Zhamshid Okhunov; Glenn M Preminger; Jean de la Rosette Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Yasir Ruhayel; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Saeed Dabestani; Steven MacLennan; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Christian Türk; Yuhong Yuan; Thomas Knoll Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 20.096