Sue Anne Bell1,2, Jennifer Horowitz2, Theodore J Iwashyna3,4,5. 1. Institute for Health Care Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor. 2. School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 3. University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor. 4. Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI. 5. Center for Clinical Management Research at VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This review synthesizes the current literature surrounding chronic disease outcomes after weather- and climate-related disasters among older adults. The associations between exposure of older adults to weather- and climate-related disasters and the primary outcomes of diabetes, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were examined. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A systematic review of studies reporting on clinical outcomes of four chronic diseases after disaster exposure was performed. Under the direction of an informationist, the databases PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Index) were searched from inception to July 2019. RESULTS: Of 5,229 citations identified, 17 articles met the study criteria. Included articles were retrospective observational in nature and focused on earthquakes (24%, n = 4), hurricane (41%, n = 7), and wildfire (35%, n = 6) disasters. Outcome data by disease process included COPD (35%, n = 6), ESRD (41%, n = 7), CHF (24%, n = 4), and diabetes (29%, n = 5). Three main categories were identified: access to health care, postdisaster health care utilization, and study rigor. The age-stratified analyses reported in this review found multiple instances where disasters have limited or insignificant effects on older adults relative to younger populations. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Disaster research faces unique methodological challenges, and there remains a need for data-driven conclusions on how best to care for older adults before, during, and after disasters. To encourage consistent dialogue among studies, we advocate for the use of rigorous and standardized scientific methodology to examine the health impacts of disasters on adults with chronic disease.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This review synthesizes the current literature surrounding chronic disease outcomes after weather- and climate-related disasters among older adults. The associations between exposure of older adults to weather- and climate-related disasters and the primary outcomes of diabetes, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were examined. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A systematic review of studies reporting on clinical outcomes of four chronic diseases after disaster exposure was performed. Under the direction of an informationist, the databases PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Index) were searched from inception to July 2019. RESULTS: Of 5,229 citations identified, 17 articles met the study criteria. Included articles were retrospective observational in nature and focused on earthquakes (24%, n = 4), hurricane (41%, n = 7), and wildfire (35%, n = 6) disasters. Outcome data by disease process included COPD (35%, n = 6), ESRD (41%, n = 7), CHF (24%, n = 4), and diabetes (29%, n = 5). Three main categories were identified: access to health care, postdisaster health care utilization, and study rigor. The age-stratified analyses reported in this review found multiple instances where disasters have limited or insignificant effects on older adults relative to younger populations. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Disaster research faces unique methodological challenges, and there remains a need for data-driven conclusions on how best to care for older adults before, during, and after disasters. To encourage consistent dialogue among studies, we advocate for the use of rigorous and standardized scientific methodology to examine the health impacts of disasters on adults with chronic disease.
Authors: Joshua A Mott; David M Mannino; Clinton J Alverson; Andrew Kiyu; Jamilah Hashim; Tzesan Lee; Kenneth Falter; Stephen C Redd Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2005 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Ana G Rappold; Neal L Fann; James Crooks; Jin Huang; Wayne E Cascio; Robert B Devlin; David Diaz-Sanchez Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Katie E Cherry; Laura Sampson; Sandro Galea; Loren D Marks; Kayla H Baudoin; Pamela F Nezat; Katie E Stanko Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Andrea J Sharma; Edward C Weiss; Stacy L Young; Kevin Stephens; Raoult Ratard; Susanne Straif-Bourgeois; Theresa M Sokol; Peter Vranken; Carol H Rubin Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Amanda H Anderson; Andrew J Cohen; Nancy G Kutner; Jeffrey B Kopp; Paul L Kimmel; Paul Muntner Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Cecilia A C Prinsen; Sunita Vohra; Michael R Rose; Maarten Boers; Peter Tugwell; Mike Clarke; Paula R Williamson; Caroline B Terwee Journal: Trials Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Joan A Casey; Marriele Mango; Seth Mullendore; Mathew V Kiang; Diana Hernández; Bonnie H Li; Kris Li; Theresa M Im; Sara Y Tartof Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Vanessa De Rubeis; Jinhee Lee; Muhammad Saqib Anwer; Yulika Yoshida-Montezuma; Alessandra T Andreacchi; Erica Stone; Saman Iftikhar; Jason D Morgenstern; Reid Rebinsky; Sarah E Neil-Sztramko; Elizabeth Alvarez; Emma Apatu; Laura N Anderson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 2.692