Literature DB >> 26451781

Research and Evaluations of the Health Aspects of Disasters, Part I: An Overview.

Marvin L Birnbaum1, Elaine K Daily2, Ann P O'Rourke3, Alessandro Loretti4.   

Abstract

The ultimate goals of conducting disaster research are to obtain information to: (1) decrease risks that a hazard will produce a disaster; (2) decrease the mortality associated with disasters; (3) decrease the morbidity associated with disasters; and (4) enhance recovery of the affected community. And decrease the risks that a hazard will produce a disaster. Two principal, but inter-related, branches of disaster research are: (1) Epidemiological; and (2) Interventional. Epidemiological research explores the relationships and occurrences that comprise a disaster from a particular event. Interventional research involves evaluations of interventions, whether they are directed at relief, recovery, hazard mitigation, capacity building, or performance. In response to the need for the discipline of Disaster Health to build its science on data that are generalizeable and comparable, a Disaster Logic Model (DLM) and a set of five Frameworks have been developed to structure the information and research of the health aspects of disasters. These Frameworks consist of the: (1) Conceptual; (2) Temporal; (3) Societal; (4) Relief/Recovery; and (5) Risk-Reduction Frameworks. The Frameworks provide a standardized format for studying and comparing the epidemiology of disasters, and with the addition of the DLM, for evaluating the interventions (responses) provided prior to, during, and following a disaster, especially as they relate to the health status of the people affected by, or at-risk for, a disaster. Critical to all five Frameworks is the inclusion of standardized definitions of the terms. The Conceptual Framework describes the progression of a hazard that becomes an event, which causes structural damage, which, in turn, results in compromised, decreased, or losses of function(s) (functional damage) that, in turn, produce needs that lead to an emergency or a disaster. The Framework incorporates a cascade of risks that lead from the presence of a hazard to the development of a disaster. Risk is the likelihood that each of the steps leading from a hazard to a disaster will take place, as well as the probabilities of consequences of each of the elements in the Conceptual Framework. The Temporal Framework describes this chronological progression as phases in order of their appearance in time; some may occur concurrently. In order to study and compare the effects of an event on the complex amalgam that constitutes a community, the essential functions of a community have been deconstructed into 13 Societal Systems that comprise the Societal Framework. These diverse, but inter-related, Societal Systems interface with each other through a 14th System, Coordination and Control. The DLM can be used to identify the effects, costs, outcomes, and impacts of any intervention. Both the Relief/Recovery and Risk-Reduction Frameworks are based on the DLM. The Relief/Recovery Framework provides the structure necessary to systematically evaluate the processes involved in interventions provided during the Relief or Recovery phases of a disaster. The Risk-Reduction Framework details the processes involved in interventions aimed at mitigating the risk that a hazard will produce a destructive event, and/or in capacity building to augment the resilience of a community to the consequences of such an event.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DLM Disaster Logic Model; Disaster Logic Model; disaster; frameworks; research; risk

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26451781     DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X15005129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med        ISSN: 1049-023X            Impact factor:   2.040


  6 in total

1.  Hospitalizations for chronic conditions following hurricanes among older adults: A self-controlled case series analysis.

Authors:  Sue Anne Bell; John P Donnelly; Wang Li; Matthew A Davis
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 7.538

2.  Health among disaster survivors and health professionals after the Haiyan Typhoon: a self-selected Internet-based web survey.

Authors:  Karin Hugelius; Mervyn Gifford; Per Örtenwall; Annsofie Adolfsson
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-29

Review 3.  Five Challenges When Managing Mass Casualty or Disaster Situations: A Review Study.

Authors:  Karin Hugelius; Julia Becker; Annsofie Adolfsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Disaster nursing research: A scoping review of the nature, content, and trends of studies published during 2011-2020.

Authors:  Karin Hugelius
Journal:  Int Emerg Nurs       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.142

Review 5.  Impact of disasters on blood donation rates and blood safety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jorien Laermans; Dorien O; Emma Van den Bosch; Emmy De Buck; Veerle Compernolle; Eilat Shinar; Philippe Vandekerckhove
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.996

6.  Health Outcomes After Disaster for Older Adults With Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sue Anne Bell; Jennifer Horowitz; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2020-09-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.