| Literature DB >> 32929339 |
Jinmei Jin1, Ye Wu1, Jinjiao Chen1,2, Yiwen Shen1, Lijun Zhang1, Hong Zhang1, Lili Chen1, Hebao Yuan3, Hongzhuan Chen1,4, Weidong Zhang1, Xin Luan1.
Abstract
Despite dramatic advances in drug discovery over the decades, effective therapeutic strategies for cancers treatment are still in urgent demands. PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC), a novel therapeutic modality, has been vigorously promoted in preclinical and clinical applications. Unlike small molecule PROTAC, peptide PROTAC (p-PROTAC) with advantages of high specificity and low toxicity, while avoiding the limitations of shallow binding pockets through large interacting surfaces, provides promising substitutions for E3 ubiquitin ligase complex-mediated ubiquitination of "undruggable proteins". It is worth noting that successful applications of p-PROTAC still have some obstacles, including low stability and poor membrane permeability. Hence, we highlight that p-PROTAC combined with cell-penetrating peptides, constrained conformation technique, and targeted delivery systems could be the future efforts for potential translational research. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: E3 ligase; peptide PROTAC; ubiquitination; undruggable proteins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32929339 PMCID: PMC7481416 DOI: 10.7150/thno.46985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Comparison of p-PROTAC and small molecule PROTAC
| p-PROTAC | small molecule PROTAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Targeting warhead | Peptides | Small molecules |
| Advantages | Ability to target "undruggable" POIs with specificity | High cellular permeability, High stability, and low cost |
| Disadvantages | Poor cell membrane permeability | Limitation of degradation of "undruggable" proteins |
| Clinical trials | None | ARV-110, ARV-471 |
Characteristics of different binding affinity analysis methods
| FP | ITC | SPR | MST | Co-IP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measuring range | pM ~ mM | nM ~μM | pM ~ mM | pM ~ mM | − |
| Protein fixation | No | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Sample consumption | Low | High | Low | Minimal | − |
| Sample number | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 ~ 16 | 1 |
| Applicable sample | Proteins; Peptides; Small molecules | Proteins; Peptides; Small molecules | Proteins; Peptides; Small molecules; Cell lysates; Culture medium Viruses, et al. | Proteins; Serum; Cell lysates; Culture medium | Cell lysates; |
| Sensitivity | High | High | High | High | Low |
| Time-consuming | Hours | Hours | Hours | Minutes | Days |
| Fluorescent labeling | Yes | Not required | Not required | Yes | No |
| Advantages | Low sample purity requirements; Real-time monitoring | Low sample purity requirements; Easy to use; Sample could be reused after the test | Real-time monitoring; | Fast and efficient; Easy to use; Close to the natural testing environment; Reaction system in solution. | Close to the natural testing environment; Commonly used for |
| Disadvantages | Expensive equipment; | Large sample consumption; Kinetics cannot be determined | Non-specific binding; Expensive equipment | Non-specific binding; Kinetics cannot be determined | Low affinity and instant PPI are difficult to detect; the error in predicting the target protein could lead to the failure |
Successful application of p-PROTACs
| Name [Ref.] | Sequence | Target | Warhead | E3 ligase | Linker | Cancer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROTACAKT
| Akt | tri_a | VHL | PEG5 | Ovarian cancer | |
| TD-PROTAC | ERα | PERMs | VHL | Ahx | Breast cancer | |
| ErbB2PPPI3K
| GPGGDYAAMGACPASEQGYEEMRA-PEG3-ALAPYIP-(D-R)8 | PI3K | ErbB2 peptide | VHL | PEG3 | Breast cancer; |
| PRTC | KRRRR-VRALKQKYEELKKEK; ESLVDK-Ahx-LAP(OH)YI. | CREPT | CREPT ligand | VHL | Ahx | Pancreatic cancer |
| PROTACX-protein
| (D-R)8-LCLRPVGAESRGRPVS; GPFG-GMLAPYIPM. | X-protein | oligomerization peptide | VHL | − | HBV-induced HCC |
| TrKAPPFRS2α
| IENPQYFSDA-Ahx2-ALAPYIP-(D-R)8 | FRS2α | TrKA phosphorylation site | VHL | Ahx2 | Neuroma (PC12) |
| PROTAC Tau-protein
| YQQYQDATADEQG-GSGS-LDPETGEYL-(D-R)8 | Tau-protein | Sequence targeting Tau | Keap1 | GSGS | Neurodegenerative disease |
Strategies used to improve p-PROTACs
| CPPs | Constrained conformation | Target delivery | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tools | TAT; poly-D-arginine; Xentry | α-helical conformation of peptides | Nanocarriers |
| Application | PROTACTau-protein; TrkAPPFRS2α; ErbB2PPPI3K; PROTACX-protein; PRTC | TD-PROTAC | − |
| Advantages | Increased permeability | Increased permeability and stability | Precise treatment |