Literature DB >> 32928563

Genetics in Light of Transcriptional Adaptation.

Zacharias Kontarakis1, Didier Y R Stainier2.   

Abstract

Genetics has recently benefited from the genome engineering revolution: genes can be knocked out, knocked down, or activated more easily than ever before. This range of genetic manipulations has also provided a range of outcomes, sometimes contradictory. But how much interesting biology hides within these discrepancies? Recent studies have shown that genetic compensation can be activated by some gene perturbations and not others, hinting that this phenomenon might skew our understanding of the genotype-phenotype relationship. We review the main findings regarding transcriptional adaptation, a newly discovered form of genetic compensation, and discuss their possible implications for establishing and analyzing animal and plant models to study gene function. We also touch upon how this new knowledge could benefit our understanding of disease-causing mutations and help explain cases of low penetrance or variable expressivity in human genetics.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal models; gene expression; genetic compensation; genome engineering; transcriptional adaptation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32928563      PMCID: PMC7612536          DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  61 in total

Review 1.  The art and design of genetic screens: Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Daniel St Johnston
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions: progressing towards the dream.

Authors:  Michelle R Arkin; James A Wells
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Off-target effects by siRNA can induce toxic phenotype.

Authors:  Yuriy Fedorov; Emily M Anderson; Amanda Birmingham; Angela Reynolds; Jon Karpilow; Kathryn Robinson; Devin Leake; William S Marshall; Anastasia Khvorova
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  Axon regeneration genes identified by RNAi screening in C. elegans.

Authors:  Paola Nix; Marc Hammarlund; Linda Hauth; Martina Lachnit; Erik M Jorgensen; Michael Bastiani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Conserved function of lincRNAs in vertebrate embryonic development despite rapid sequence evolution.

Authors:  Igor Ulitsky; Alena Shkumatava; Calvin H Jan; Hazel Sive; David P Bartel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity.

Authors:  Martin Jinek; Krzysztof Chylinski; Ines Fonfara; Michael Hauer; Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems.

Authors:  Le Cong; F Ann Ran; David Cox; Shuailiang Lin; Robert Barretto; Naomi Habib; Patrick D Hsu; Xuebing Wu; Wenyan Jiang; Luciano A Marraffini; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; Luhan Yang; Kevin M Esvelt; John Aach; Marc Guell; James E DiCarlo; Julie E Norville; George M Church
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Selection-free zinc-finger-nuclease engineering by context-dependent assembly (CoDA).

Authors:  Jeffry D Sander; Elizabeth J Dahlborg; Mathew J Goodwin; Lindsay Cade; Feng Zhang; Daniel Cifuentes; Shaun J Curtin; Jessica S Blackburn; Stacey Thibodeau-Beganny; Yiping Qi; Christopher J Pierick; Ellen Hoffman; Morgan L Maeder; Cyd Khayter; Deepak Reyon; Drena Dobbs; David M Langenau; Robert M Stupar; Antonio J Giraldez; Daniel F Voytas; Randall T Peterson; Jing-Ruey J Yeh; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Guidelines for morpholino use in zebrafish.

Authors:  Didier Y R Stainier; Erez Raz; Nathan D Lawson; Stephen C Ekker; Rebecca D Burdine; Judith S Eisen; Philip W Ingham; Stefan Schulte-Merker; Deborah Yelon; Brant M Weinstein; Mary C Mullins; Stephen W Wilson; Lalita Ramakrishnan; Sharon L Amacher; Stephan C F Neuhauss; Anming Meng; Naoki Mochizuki; Pertti Panula; Cecilia B Moens
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  4 in total

1.  Differential intolerance to loss of function and missense mutations in genes that encode human matricellular proteins.

Authors:  Sukhbir Kaur; David D Roberts
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.782

2.  Zebrafish models of alx-linked frontonasal dysplasia reveal a role for Alx1 and Alx3 in the anterior segment and vasculature of the developing eye.

Authors:  Baul Yoon; Pan Yeung; Nicholas Santistevan; Lauren E Bluhm; Kenta Kawasaki; Janina Kueper; Richard Dubielzig; Jennifer VanOudenhove; Justin Cotney; Eric C Liao; Yevgenya Grinblat
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.643

3.  Genetic compensation of triacylglycerol biosynthesis in the green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Yi-Ying Lee; Rudolph Park; Stephen M Miller; Yantao Li
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 7.091

4.  Screening and validation of genome-edited animals.

Authors:  Rosie K Bunton-Stasyshyn; Gemma F Codner; Lydia Teboul
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.471

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.