Literature DB >> 11972155

The art and design of genetic screens: Drosophila melanogaster.

Daniel St Johnston1.   

Abstract

The success of Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism is largely due to the power of forward genetic screens to identify the genes that are involved in a biological process. Traditional screens, such as the Nobel-prize-winning screen for embryonic-patterning mutants, can only identify the earliest phenotype of a mutation. This review describes the ingenious approaches that have been devised to circumvent this problem: modifier screens, for example, have been invaluable for elucidating signal-transduction pathways, whereas clonal screens now make it possible to screen for almost any phenotype in any cell at any stage of development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11972155     DOI: 10.1038/nrg751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN: 1471-0056            Impact factor:   53.242


  216 in total

Review 1.  Modeling human neurodegenerative diseases in transgenic systems.

Authors:  Miguel A Gama Sosa; Rita De Gasperi; Gregory A Elder
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Microfluidic chamber arrays for whole-organism behavior-based chemical screening.

Authors:  Kwanghun Chung; Mei Zhan; Jagan Srinivasan; Paul W Sternberg; Emily Gong; Frank C Schroeder; Hang Lu
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 3.  Modifiers and mechanisms of multi-system polyglutamine neurodegenerative disorders: lessons from fly models.

Authors:  Moushami Mallik; Subhash C Lakhotia
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  High-resolution SNP mapping by denaturing HPLC.

Authors:  Knud Nairz; Hugo Stocker; Benno Schindelholz; Ernst Hafen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  MicroRNA transgene overexpression complements deficiency-based modifier screens in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sébastien Szuplewski; Jan-Michael Kugler; Sing Fee Lim; Pushpa Verma; Ya-Wen Chen; Stephen M Cohen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  "Vacuum-assisted staining": a simple and efficient method for screening in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nicola Berns; Innokenty Woichansky; Nadine Kraft; Ulrike Hüsken; Matthias Carl; Veit Riechmann
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  Toward a complete Drosophila deficiency kit.

Authors:  John Roote; Steven Russell
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Biclustering of linear patterns in gene expression data.

Authors:  Qinghui Gao; Christine Ho; Yingmin Jia; Jingyi Jessica Li; Haiyan Huang
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.479

9.  The SILAC fly allows for accurate protein quantification in vivo.

Authors:  Matthias D Sury; Jia-Xuan Chen; Matthias Selbach
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Genetic variants of Adam17 differentially regulate TGFβ signaling to modify vascular pathology in mice and humans.

Authors:  Kyoko Kawasaki; Julia Freimuth; Dominique S Meyer; Marie M Lee; Akiko Tochimoto-Okamoto; Michael Benzinou; Frederic F Clermont; Gloria Wu; Ritu Roy; Tom G W Letteboer; Johannes Kristian Ploos van Amstel; Sophie Giraud; Sophie Dupuis-Girod; Gaeten Lesca; Cornelius J J Westermann; Robert J Coffey; Rosemary J Akhurst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.