| Literature DB >> 32927887 |
Shiou-Ling Li1,2, Ho-Cheng Wu2, Tsong-Long Hwang3,4,5, Chu-Hung Lin6, Shuen-Shin Yang1, Hsun-Shuo Chang1,2,7,8.
Abstract
In a series of anti-inflammatory screenings of lauraceous plants, the methanolic extract of the leaves of Machilus japonica var. kusanoi (Hayata) J.C. Liao showed potent inhibition on both superoxide anion generation and elastase release in human neutrophils. Bioassay-guided fractionation of the leaves of M. japonica var. kusanoi led to the isolation of twenty compounds, including six new butanolides, machinolides A-F (1-6), and fourteen known compounds (7-20). Their structures were characterized by 1D and 2D NMR, UV, IR, CD, and MS data. The absolute configuration of the new compounds were unambiguously confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses (1, 2, and 3) and Mosher's method (4, 5, and 6). In addition, lignans, (+)-eudesmin (11), (+)-methylpiperitol (12), (+)-pinoresinol (13), and (+)-galbelgin (16) exhibited inhibitory effects on N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine/cytochalasin B (fMLP/CB)-induced superoxide anion generation in human neutrophils with IC50 values of 8.71 ± 0.74 μM, 2.23 ± 0.92 μM, 6.81 ± 1.07 μM, and 7.15 ± 2.26 μM, respectively. The results revealed the anti-inflammatory potentials of Formosan Machilus japonica var. kusanoi.Entities:
Keywords: Machilus japonica var. kusanoi; anti-inflammatory activity; butanolide; lauraceae; lignan
Year: 2020 PMID: 32927887 PMCID: PMC7570621 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25184149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of new compounds 1–6.
1H and 13C-NMR data of machinolides A–C (1–3).
| Position | 1 a | 2 b | 3 b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 1 | 177.5 | 177.4 | 177.4 | |||
| 2 | 2.57, dt (9.8, 4.8) | 47.6 | 2.57, dt (10.2, 4.6) | 47.6 | 2.57, dt (8.7, 4.8) | 47.6 |
| 3 | 4.31, dd (4.8, 3.2) | 71.2 | 4.31, dd (4.6, 3.2) | 71.3 | 4.31, dd (4.8, 3.2) | 71.3 |
| 4 | 4.45, qd, (6.6, 3.2) | 78.8 | 4.45, qd (6.6, 3.2) | 78.7 | 4.45, qd (6.6, 3.2) | 78.7 |
| 5 | 1.43, d (6.6) | 13.7 | 1.44, d (6.6) | 13.7 | 1.44, d (6.6) | 13.7 |
| 6 | 1.82, m | 23.1 | 1.84, m | 23.2 | 1.84, m | 23.3 |
| 7 | 1.26~1.47, m | 27.5 | 1.32~1.51, m | 27.6 | 1.30~1.49, m | 27.5 |
| 8 | 1.26~1.47, m | 29.4 | 1.32~1.51, m | 29.4 | 1.30~1.49, m | 29.3 c |
| 9 | 1.26~1.47, m | 25.1 | 1.32~1.51, m | 25.1 c | 1.30~1.49, m | 29.4 c |
| 10 | 1.26~1.47, m | 37.16 c | 1.32~1.51, m | 37.2 d | 1.30~1.49, m | 25.5 |
| 11 | 3.59, m | 71.9 | 3.59, m | 71.9 | 1.30~1.49, m | 37.4 |
| 12 | 1.26~1.47, m | 37.19 c | 1.32~1.51, m | 37.4 d | 3.60, m | 71.8 |
| 13 | 1.26~1.47, m | 27.8 | 1.32~1.51, m | 25.2 c | 1.30~1.49, m | 39.7 |
| 14 | 1.26~1.47, m | 22.7 | 1.37, m | 28.9 | 1.30~1.49, m | 18.8 |
| 15 | 0.91, t (7.0) | 14.0 | 2.07, m | 33.7 | 0.93, t (7.2) | 14.1 |
| 16 | 5.81, ddt (17.1, 10.2, 6.6) | 138.9 | ||||
| 17 | 5.00, ddt (17.1, 3.3, 1.5) | 114.4 | ||||
a1H (400 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3). b1H (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3). c,d the data in the same column are interchangeable.
Figure 2Key 1H-1H COSY (━) and HMBC (H→C) correlations of machinolides A–F (1–6).
Figure 3NOESY (H↔H) correlations of machinolides A–F (1–6).
Figure 4Perspective drawing of X-ray structures of machinolides A–C (1–3).
1H and 13C-NMR data of machinolides D–F (4–6).
| Position | 4 a | 5 b | 6 b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| 177.4 | 177.3 | 177.7 | |||
|
| 2.55, dt (9.9, 5.0) | 47.5 | 2.56, dt (9.8, 4.5) | 47.5 | 2.54, dt (10.0, 5.0) | 47.5 |
|
| 4.31, dd (5.0, 3.0) | 71.3 | 4.30, br t (4.5) | 71.3 | 4.30, dd (5.0, 3.1) | 71.1 |
|
| 4.45, qd (6.5, 3.0) | 78.8 | 4.54, qd (6.4, 2.9) | 78.7 | 4.44, qd (6.0, 3.1) | 79.0 |
|
| 1.44, d (6.5) | 13.7 | 1.44, d (6.4) | 13.7 | 1.42, d (6.0) | 13.7 |
|
| 1.80, m | 23.1 | 1.84, m | 23.1 | 1.79, m | 23.1 |
|
| 1.35~1.55, m | 27.4 | 1.33~1.58, m | 27.4 | 1.24~1.52, m | 27.3 |
|
| 1.35~1.55, m | 29.0 | 1.33~1.58, m | 29.0 | 1.24~1.52, m | 29.0 |
|
| 1.67, m | 23.2 | 1.67, m | 23.2 | 1.64, m | 23.2 |
|
| 2.40~2.54, m | 37.7 | 2.46, m | 37.7 | 2.46, m | 37.7 |
|
| 212.6 | 212.4 | 212.7 | |||
|
| 4.17, dd (7.5, 3.9) | 76.3 | 4.17, dd (7.2, 3.6) | 76.3 | 4.15, dd (7.4, 3.8) | 76.5 |
|
| 1.35~1.55, m | 35.9 | 1.84, m | 33.1 | 1.79, m | 33.7 |
|
| 1.35~1.55, m | 18.2 | 1.33~1.58, m | 24.0 | 1.24~1.52, m | 24.5 |
|
| 0.95, t (6.9) | 13.9 | 2.09, m | 33.3 | 1.24~1.52, m | 31.6 |
|
| 5.78, ddt (17.2, 10.4, 6.8) | 138.1 | 1.24~1.52, m | 22.5 | ||
|
| 5.03, m | 115.1 | 0.88, t (6.8) | 14.0 | ||
a1H (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3). b1H (400 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3).
Figure 5Results with the modified Mosher’s method (ΔδS–R) of machinolides D–F (4–6).
Effect of compounds on superoxide anion generation and elastase release in fMLP/CB-stimulated human neutrophils.
| Compound | Superoxide Anion | Elastase Release |
|---|---|---|
| IC50 (μM) a | IC50 (μM) a | |
| machinolide A ( | >10 | >10 |
| machinolide B ( | >10 | >10 |
| machinolide C ( | >10 | >10 |
| machinolide F ( | >10 | >10 |
| (+)-eudesmin ( | 8.71 ± 0.74 | >10 |
| (+)-methylpiperitol ( | 2.23 ± 0.92 | >10 |
| (+)-pinoresinol ( | 6.81 ± 1.07 | >10 |
| (+)-galbelgin ( | 7.15 ± 2.26 | >10 |
| LY294002 b | 2.17 ± 0.53 | 6.38 ± 1.72 |
a Concentration necessary for 50% inhibition (IC50). b Positive control.