| Literature DB >> 32927699 |
Bing Liang1, Wei Liu1, Kun Liu1, Mengde Zhou1, Yang Zhang1, Zhenyuan Jia1.
Abstract
Full-field displacement perception and digital twins for core components play a crucial role in the precision manufacturing industry, such as aviation manufacturing. This paper presents a real-time full-field displacement perception method for the combination of online multipoint displacement monitoring and matrix completion theory. Firstly, a conceptual full-field displacement perception model based on the observed information of the multi-points is established. To obtain the full-field displacements of a core component, the component is divided into plentiful discrete points, including observed and unobserved points, based on which the relationship between the observed points and the full-field displacements is established. Then, the solution method of the full-field displacement perception model is proposed. Based on the matrix completion principle and the big data of the simulation, the optimization problem is employed to work out the model and, meanwhile, the pseudo-code is put forward. Finally, the full-field displacement perception experiments are performed. Repeated experiments show that the max error of the displacements calculated by the proposed method can be less than 0.094 mm and the median error can be less than 0.054 mm, while the average time frame can be less than 0.48 s, which is promising considering the high precision and efficiency requirements of the assembly of large aircraft.Entities:
Keywords: aircraft manufacture; assembly; digital twin; full-field displacement perception; matrix completion
Year: 2020 PMID: 32927699 PMCID: PMC7571103 DOI: 10.3390/s20185161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Monitoring process based on cameras.
Figure 2Measurement and modeling principle.
Figure 3Principle of model solution.
Figure 4Pseudo-code for the optimization process.
Figure 5Layout of the facilities.
Figure 6Force loading in the simulation tests.
Simulation groups of each positioner.
| Loading Mode | Group Counts |
|---|---|
| point loading |
|
| line loading | 10,647 |
| surface loading | 10,647 |
| mixed loading |
|
| total | 293,895 |
Figure 7Full-field displacement data set acquisition in the simulation test.
Figure 8Comparison between the simulation and the model perception. (a) Full-field displacements based on simulation and model perception. (b) Absolute errors between the results of simulation and model perception.
Figure 9Displacement perception error statistics of all the samples in .
Figure 10Digital twins for the core positioners in the production site based on the proposed displacement perception method. (a) The observed positioners. (b) The full-field displacements of the positioners.
Figure 11Comparison between the results of actual monitoring and model perception.
Figure 12Displacement perception error statistics of all the positioners.