| Literature DB >> 32927694 |
Michael Wilkinson1,2, Piriyah Sinclair2, Ludmilla Dellatorre-Teixeira2, Patrick Swan2, Eoin Brennan2, Bruce Moran3, Dirk Wedekind4, Paul Downey5, Kieran Sheahan3, Emer Conroy6, William M Gallagher6, Neil Docherty2, Carel le Roux2,3, Donal J Brennan1,2,6,7.
Abstract
We sought to validate the BDII/Han rat model as a model for diet-induced obesity in endometrial cancer (EC) and determine if transcriptomic changes induced by a high fat diet (HFD) in an EC rat model can be used to identify novel biomarkers in human EC. Nineteen BDII/Han rats were included. Group A (n = 7) were given ad lib access to a normal calorie, normal chow diet (NCD) while Group B (n = 12) were given ad lib access to a calorie rich HFD for 15 months. RNAseq was performed on endometrial tumours from both groups. The top-ranking differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were examined in the human EC using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to assess if the BDII/Han rat model is an appropriate model for human obesity-induced carcinogenesis. Weight gain in HFD rats was double the weight gain of NCD rats (50 g vs. 25 g). The incidence of cancer was similar in both groups (4/7-57% vs. 4/12-33%; p = 0.37). All tumours were equivalent to a Stage 1A, Grade 2 human endometrioid carcinoma. A total of 368 DEGs were identified between the tumours in the HFD group compared to the NCD group. We identified two upstream regulators of the DEGs, mir-33 and Brd4, and a pathway analysis identified downstream enrichment of the colorectal cancer metastasis and ovarian cancer metastasis pathways. Top-ranking DEGs included Tex14, A2M, Hmgcs2, Adamts5, Pdk4, Crabp2, Capn12, Npw, Idi1 and Gpt. A2M expression was decreased in HFD tumours. Consistent with these findings, we found a significant negative correlation between A2M mRNA expression levels and BMI in the TCGA cohort (Spearman's Rho = -0.263, p < 0.001). A2M expression was associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.9, p = 0.024). Crabp2 expression was increased in HFD tumours. In human EC, CRABP2 expression was associated with reduced overall survival (HR = 3.554, 95% CI 1.875-6.753, p < 0.001). Diet-induced obesity can alter EC transcriptomic profiles. The BDII/Han rat model is a suitable model of diet-induced obesity in endometrial cancer and can be used to identify clinically relevant biomarkers in human EC.Entities:
Keywords: endometrial cancer; obesity; transcriptomics
Year: 2020 PMID: 32927694 PMCID: PMC7554710 DOI: 10.3390/life10090188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Figure 1Diet-induced obesity in BDII/Han rats. (A) Graphical representation of the weight trajectory of the normal chow diet (NCD; n = 7, blue line) and high fat diet group (HFD; n = 12, red line). (B) Comparative CT imaging and photos taken at necropsy, showing the increase in volume of intra-abdominal fat in the HFD group (right) relative to rats from the NCD group (left). (C) Hysterectomy specimen from a BDII/Han rat from the high fat diet group. H&E showing endometrial adenocarcinoma in the right proximal uterine horn with a magnified (20×) view of the histology slide showing a solid area of the endometrial adenocarcinoma. (D) Hysterectomy specimen from a normal chow-fed BDII/Han rat. H&E showing endometrial adenocarcinoma in the left distal uterine horn, with a magnified (20×) view of the histology slide showing a gland-rich endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Figure 2Transcriptomic characteristics of the impact of diet-induced obesity on BDII/Han endometrial tumours. (A) Volcano plot showing the differentially expressed genes between tumours from the HFD and NCD groups. The genes delineated in red are those that reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). The box plot on the left shows the top 5 genes with reduced expression in the HFD group relative to the NCD group. The box plot on the right shows the top 5 genes with increased expression in the HFD group relative to the NCD group. The HFD group is delineated in blue and the NCD group in red. (B) Top ranking canonical pathways in HFD and NCD tumour tissue. (C) Upstream regulators of DEGs in HFD and NCD tumours. (D) Brd4 was a statistically significant upstream regulator, imparting a downstream effect on five DEGs. (E) mir-33 was a statistically significant upstream regulator, imparting a downstream effect on five DEGs. (G) Brd4 is prognostic in human endometrial cancer with decreased expression leading to lower overall survival. (F) Antibody stain showing high expression of Brd4 in 9/11 endometrial cancer samples from the Human Protein Atlas TCGA pathology database. (H) Corresponding antibody stain showing low expression of Brd4 in 3/11 human thyroid cancer samples from the Human Protein Atlas TCGA pathology database. The Human Protein Atlas was accessed July 2020.
Figure 3Genes altered by obesity in the BDII/Han model are clinically relevant in human endometrial cancer. (A) Genomic and transcriptomic alterations of the top 10 differentially expressed genes identified in human endometrial cancers. (B) Increased expression of A2M leads to a significant improved overall survival in human endometrial cancer. (C) Immunohistochemistry from the Human Protein Atlas demonstrates the expression of the A2M protein in human endometrial cancer. (D) Increased expression of CRABP2 leads to a significantly improved reduced survival in human endometrial cancer. (E) Immunohistochemistry from the Human Protein Atlas demonstrates the expression of CRABP2 protein in human endometrial cancer. The Human Protein Atlas was accessed July 2020.
A2M and Crabp2 mRNA expression and clinicopathological variables.
| Crabp2 Low | Crabp2 High | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Median (range) | 63 (35–90) | 63 (31–90) | 0.665 | 63 (33–90) | 65 (31–90) | 0.093 * |
| BMI Median (range) | 33.1 (19–82) | 32.3 (17–61) | <0.001 * | 33 (17–82) | 31 (19–68) | 0.485 * |
| Histology | ||||||
| Endometrioid | 147 (77) | 158 (87) | 0.003 | 238(90) | 67 (63) | <0.001 |
| Serous | 32 (16.7) | 21 (12) | 20 (7) | 33 (31) | ||
| Mixed | 12 (6.3) | 1 (1) | 7 (3) | 6 (6) | ||
| Stage | ||||||
| 1 | 120 (63.1) | 132(74.2) | 0.15 | 194 (74) | 59 (55) | 0.005 |
| 2 | 16 (8.4) | 10 (5) | 16 (6) | 10 (9) | ||
| 3 | 44 (23.1) | 30 (16.8) | 47 (18) | 28 (26) | ||
| 4 | 11 (5.4) | 8 (4) | 8 (2) | 9 (9) | ||
| Grade | ||||||
| 1 | 31 (16.2) | 58 (32.2) | <0.001 | 74 (28) | 15 (14) | 0.001 |
| 2 | 50 (26.1) | 55 (30.5) | 77 (29) | 28 (26) | ||
| 3 | 110 (57.7) | 67 (37.3) | 114 (43) | 63 (59) | ||
| TCGA molecular subtype | ||||||
| POLE | 11 (10.2) | 6 (4.8) | 0.28 | 16 (10) | 1 (2) | <0.001 |
| MSI | 30 (28) | 35 (28) | 58 (35) | 7 (10) | ||
| CN Low | 32 (30) | 58 (46.4) | 65 (39) | 25 (37) | ||
| CN High | 34 (31.8) | 26 (20.8) | 26 (16) | 34 (51) |
Values in parenthesis are percentages unless otherwise stated. Abbreviations: BMI—body mass index; SEM—standard error of the mean; TCGA—The Cancer Genome Atlas; MSI—microsatellite instable; CN—copy number. * Mann–Whitney U test.
Cox regression analysis of OS for A2M and Crabp2.
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.455 | 0.23 | 0.9 | 0.024 | 0.612 | 0.305 | 1.229 | 0.167 | |
| Age (continuous) | 1.041 | 1.009 | 1.075 | 0.013 | 1.053 | 1.015 | 1.092 | 0.005 |
| Histology (endometrioid vs. non-endometrioid | 2.298 | 1.18 | 4.475 | 0.014 | 0.705 | 0.311 | 1.595 | 0.401 |
| Stage (1 and 2 vs. 3 and 4) | 4.654 | 2.448 | 8.849 | <0.001 | 3.912 | 1.903 | 8.042 | <0.001 |
| Grade (1 and 2 vs. 3) | 3.393 | 1.652 | 6.969 | 0.001 | 1.848 | 0.796 | 4.289 | 0.153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Crabp2 (low vs. high) | 3.554 | 1.875 | 6.735 | <0.001 | 3.134 | 1.524 | 6.443 | 0.002 |
| Age (continuous) | 1.041 | 1.009 | 1.075 | 0.013 | 1.046 | 1.011 | 1.083 | 0.01 |
| Histology (endometrioid vs. non-endometrioid) | 2.298 | 1.18 | 4.475 | 0.014 | 0.451 | 0.193 | 1.052 | 0.065 |
| Stage (1 and 2 vs. 3 and 4) | 4.654 | 2.448 | 8.849 | <0.001 | 3.875 | 1.868 | 8.036 | <0.001 |
| Grade (1 and 2 vs. 3) | 3.393 | 1.652 | 6.969 | 0.001 | 1.802 | 0.775 | 4.19 | 0.171 |
Abbreviations: A2M—alpha2macroglobulin; CI—confidence interval; HR—hazard ratio; OS—overall survival.