Literature DB >> 32926406

Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.

Mahmood F Bhutta1, Karen Head2, Lee-Yee Chong3, Jessica Daw4, Anne Gm Schilder5, Martin J Burton6, Christopher G Brennan-Jones4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), sometimes referred to as chronic otitis media (COM), is a chronic inflammation and often polymicrobial infection (involving more than one micro-organism) of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, characterised by ear discharge (otorrhoea) through a perforated tympanic membrane. The predominant symptoms of CSOM are ear discharge and hearing loss. Aural toileting is a term describing a number of processes for manually cleaning the ear. Techniques used may include dry mopping (with cotton wool or tissue paper), suction clearance (typically under a microscope) or irrigation (using manual or automated syringing). Dry mopping may be effective in removing mucopurulent discharge. Compared to irrigation or microsuction it is less effective in removing epithelial debris or thick pus. Aural toileting can be used alone or in addition to other treatments for CSOM, such as antibiotics or topical antiseptics.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of aural toilet procedures for people with CSOM. SEARCH
METHODS: The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL via the Cochrane Register of Studies); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 16 March 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with at least a one-week follow-up involving people (adults and children) who had chronic ear discharge of unknown cause or CSOM, where the ear discharge had continued for more than two weeks. We included any aural toileting method as the intervention, at any frequency and for any duration. The comparisons were aural toileting compared with a) placebo or no intervention, and b) any other aural toileting method. We analysed trials in which background treatments were used in both arms (e.g. topical antiseptics or topical antibiotics) separately. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Our primary outcomes were: resolution of ear discharge or 'dry ear' (whether otoscopically confirmed or not), measured at between one week and up to two weeks, two weeks to up to four weeks, and after four weeks; health-related quality of life using a validated instrument; and ear pain (otalgia) or discomfort or local irritation. Secondary outcomes were hearing, serious complications, and the adverse events of ear bleeding and dizziness/vertigo/balance problems. MAIN
RESULTS: We included three studies with a total of 431 participants (465 ears), reporting on two comparisons. Two studies included only children with CSOM in the community (351 participants) and the other study (80 participants) included children and adults with chronic ear discharge for at least six weeks. None of the included studies reported the outcomes of health-related quality of life, ear pain or the adverse event of ear bleeding. Daily aural toileting (dry mopping) versus no treatment Two studies (351 children; 370 ears) compared daily dry mopping with no treatment. Neither study presented results for resolution of ear discharge at between one and up to two weeks or between two to four weeks. For resolution of ear discharge after four weeks, one study reported the results per person. We are very uncertain whether there is a difference at 16 weeks (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.72; 1 study; 217 participants) because the certainty of the evidence is very low. No results were reported for the adverse events of dizziness, vertigo or balance problems. Only one study reported serious complications, but it was not clear which group these patients were from, or whether the complications occurred pre- or post-treatment. One study reported hearing, but the results were presented by treatment outcome rather than by treatment group so it is not possible to determine whether there is a difference between the two groups. Daily aural toileting versus single aural toileting on top of topical ciprofloxacin One study (80 participants; 95 ears) compared daily aural toileting (suction) with administration of topical antibiotic (ciprofloxacin) ear drops in a clinic, to a single aural toileting (suction) episode followed by daily self-administered topical antibiotic drops, in participants of all ages. We are unsure whether there is a difference in resolution of ear discharge at between one and up to two weeks (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.30; 1 study; 80 participants) because the certainty of the evidence is very low. There were no results reported for resolution of ear discharge at between two to four weeks. The results for resolution of ear discharge after four weeks were presented by ear, not person, and could not be adjusted to by person. One patient in the group with single aural toileting and self administration of topical antibiotic ear drops reported the adverse event of dizziness, which the authors attributed to the use of cold topical ciprofloxacin. It is very uncertain whether there is a difference between the groups (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.95; 1 study; 80 participants, very low-certainty). No results were reported for the other adverse events of vertigo or balance problems, or for serious complications. The authors only reported qualitatively that there was no difference between the two groups in hearing results (very low-certainty). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: We are very uncertain whether or not treatment with aural toileting is effective in resolving ear discharge in people with CSOM, due to a lack of data and the poor quality of the available evidence. We also remain uncertain about other outcomes, including adverse events, as these were not well reported. Similarly, we are very uncertain whether daily suction clearance, followed by antibiotic ear drops administered at a clinic, is better than a single episode of suction clearance followed by self-administration of topical antibiotic ear drops.
Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32926406      PMCID: PMC8095014          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  47 in total

1.  Complications of chronic suppurative otitis media: a retrospective review.

Authors:  E Yorgancılar; M Yildirim; R Gun; S Bakir; R Tekin; C Gocmez; F Meric; I Topcu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Chronic suppurative otitis media: a review.

Authors:  Monique Verhoeff; Erwin L van der Veen; Maroeska M Rovers; Elisabeth A M Sanders; Anne G M Schilder
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Chronic suppurative otitis media in Tanzanian school children and its effects on hearing.

Authors:  B M Minja; N H Moshi; L Ingvarsson; I Bastos; J Grenner
Journal:  East Afr Med J       Date:  2006-06

4.  Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues.

Authors:  Margaret R Stedman; François Curtin; Diana R Elbourne; Aaron S Kesselheim; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  A randomised controlled trial of active chronic otitis media comparing courses of eardrops versus one-off topical treatments suitable for primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare settings.

Authors:  J W Loock
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.597

6.  Preoperative therapeutic considerations in chronic suppurative otitis media.

Authors:  T Papastavros; H Giamarellou; S Varlejides
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  General and disease-specific quality of life in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media--a prospective study.

Authors:  Ingo Baumann; Bianca Gerendas; Peter K Plinkert; Mark Praetorius
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Microsuction aural toilet in ENT outpatients: a questionnaire to evaluate the patient experience.

Authors:  J Addams-Williams; A Howarth; J J Phillipps
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Vertigo following aural suction: can it be prevented?

Authors:  R F Gray; A R Nicolaides
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1988-08

10.  Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.

Authors:  Karen Head; Lee-Yee Chong; Mahmood F Bhutta; Peter S Morris; Shyan Vijayasekaran; Martin J Burton; Anne Gm Schilder; Christopher G Brennan-Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-06
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.

Authors:  Lee-Yee Chong; Karen Head; Katie E Webster; Jessica Dew; Peter Richmond; Tom Snelling; Mahmood F Bhutta; Anne Gm Schilder; Martin J Burton; Christopher G Brennan-Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-04

2.  Topical azole treatments for otomycosis.

Authors:  Ambrose Lee; James R Tysome; Shakeel R Saeed
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-25

3.  Differences in Hygiene Habits among Children Aged 8 to 11 Years by Type of Schooling.

Authors:  Ana María Pérez Pico; Esther Mingorance Álvarez; Julia Villar Rodríguez; Raquel Mayordomo Acevedo
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19

Review 4.  Etiology, Diagnosis, Complications, and Management of Acute Otitis Media in Children.

Authors:  Abdullah Jamal; Abdulla Alsabea; Mohammad Tarakmeh; Ali Safar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-15

5.  Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.

Authors:  Lee-Yee Chong; Karen Head; Katie E Webster; Jessica Daw; Peter Richmond; Tom Snelling; Mahmood F Bhutta; Anne Gm Schilder; Martin J Burton; Christopher G Brennan-Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-09

6.  Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.

Authors:  Christopher G Brennan-Jones; Karen Head; Lee-Yee Chong; Martin J Burton; Anne Gm Schilder; Mahmood F Bhutta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-02

7.  Topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.

Authors:  Karen Head; Lee-Yee Chong; Mahmood F Bhutta; Peter S Morris; Shyan Vijayasekaran; Martin J Burton; Anne Gm Schilder; Christopher G Brennan-Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-06

8.  Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.

Authors:  Karen Head; Lee-Yee Chong; Mahmood F Bhutta; Peter S Morris; Shyan Vijayasekaran; Martin J Burton; Anne Gm Schilder; Christopher G Brennan-Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-06

9.  Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.

Authors:  Mahmood F Bhutta; Karen Head; Lee-Yee Chong; Jessica Daw; Anne Gm Schilder; Martin J Burton; Christopher G Brennan-Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-14

10.  Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility Analysis of Stephanoascus ciferrii Complex Species Isolated From Patients With Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media.

Authors:  Penghao Guo; Zhongwen Wu; Pingjuan Liu; Yili Chen; Kang Liao; Yaqin Peng; Yuting He
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.