Literature DB >> 32926212

Does microenema administration improve the quality of DWI sequences in rectal MRI?

Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam1, Sidra Javed-Tayyab1, Natalie Gangai1, Junting Zheng2, Marinela Capanu2, David D B Bates1, James L Fuqua1, Viktoriya Paroder1, Jennifer Golia-Pernicka1, Marc J Gollub1, Iva Petkovska3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the administration of a microenema immediately prior to rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) decreases the level of gas-related artifacts on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 492 (183 baseline and 309 post-total neoadjuvant treatment [TNT]) consecutive MRI scans for rectal cancer from January 2019 to January 2020. Scan-related factors were identified including microenema use (yes or no), field of view (FOV) in DWI (b = 800 or b = 1500), and magnet strength (1.5 T or 3 T). Two readers scored DWI studies for gas-related artifacts and T2-weighted sequences for the amount of intraluminal gas on a 5-point scale. Fisher's exact test and the Rao-Scott Chi-squared test were used to examine associations between microenema use and other factors. Generalized estimating equation and multivariable regression models were performed to examine the effect of microenema use in subgroups of scans for each reader. Cohen's κ was used to assess inter-reader agreement.
RESULTS: Gas-related artifact levels decreased in scans with microenema overall (P < 0.001) as well as when scans were stratified by FOV (P ≤ 0.003). For both readers, post-TNT scans with microenema showed lower artifact levels overall (P < 0.014 and P < 0.001) and in post-TNT subgroups of axial DWI scans (P ≤ 0.006 and P < 0.001) and scans acquired with a 3 T magnet (P ≤ 0.001 for both FOV). No evidence of decreased artifact level was found for baseline studies. Decreased gas was seen with microenema use (P < 0.001 for both readers). Inter-reader agreement on artifact-level and gas-level assessments ranged from slight to substantial (κ = 0.273-0.685).
CONCLUSION: Microenema use prior to rectal MRI reduces gas-related artifacts on DWI, including both large and small FOV sequences and particularly on post-TNT scans performed at 3 T, and offers a viable solution to improve DWI quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion-weighted imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Microenema; Rectal neoplasms; Susceptibility artifact

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32926212      PMCID: PMC7946648          DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02718-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  18 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen at 3.0 Tesla: image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility compared with 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Marcel Oei; James S Babb; Benjamin E Niver; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Denis Le Bihan; Cyril Poupon; Alexis Amadon; Franck Lethimonnier
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  MRI of Rectal Cancer: Tumor Staging, Imaging Techniques, and Management.

Authors:  Natally Horvat; Camila Carlos Tavares Rocha; Brunna Clemente Oliveira; Iva Petkovska; Marc J Gollub
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  Rectal imaging: part 1, High-resolution MRI of carcinoma of the rectum at 3 T.

Authors:  Vivek Gowdra Halappa; Celia Pamela Corona Villalobos; Susanne Bonekamp; Susan L Gearhart; Jonathan Efron; Joseph Herman; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Locally advanced rectal cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting tumor clearance of the mesorectal fascia after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

Authors:  Min Jung Park; Seong Hyun Kim; Soon Jin Lee; Kyung Mi Jang; Hyunchul Rhim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited.

Authors:  Elmar M Merkle; Brian M Dale
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Diffusion-weighted MRI for selection of complete responders after chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Doenja M J Lambregts; Vincent Vandecaveye; Brunella Barbaro; Frans C H Bakers; Maarten Lambrecht; Monique Maas; Karin Haustermans; Vincenzo Valentini; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI to diagnose a local tumour regrowth during long-term follow-up of rectal cancer patients treated with organ preservation after chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Doenja M J Lambregts; Max J Lahaye; Luc A Heijnen; Milou H Martens; Monique Maas; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting.

Authors:  Regina G H Beets-Tan; Doenja M J Lambregts; Monique Maas; Shandra Bipat; Brunella Barbaro; Luís Curvo-Semedo; Helen M Fenlon; Marc J Gollub; Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Steve Halligan; Christine Hoeffel; Seung Ho Kim; Andrea Laghi; Andrea Maier; Søren R Rafaelsen; Jaap Stoker; Stuart A Taylor; Michael R Torkzad; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer using modern MR imaging: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Doenja M J Lambregts; Thierry N Boellaard; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-02-13
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  MRI for Rectal Cancer: Staging, mrCRM, EMVI, Lymph Node Staging and Post-Treatment Response.

Authors:  David D B Bates; Maria El Homsi; Kevin J Chang; Neeraj Lalwani; Natally Horvat; Shannon P Sheedy
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 4.481

2.  Multi-practice survey on MR imaging practice patterns in rectal cancer in the United States.

Authors:  David D B Bates; Hiram Shaish; Marc J Gollub; Mukesh Harisinghani; Chandana Lall; Shannon P Sheedy
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-10-04

Review 3.  The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Marc J Gollub; Gina Brown
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.388

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.