Literature DB >> 32925860

Early Experience With Telemedicine in Patients Undergoing Otologic/Neurotologic Procedures.

Scott B Shapiro1, Noga Lipschitz1, Nathan Kemper1, Mario Zuccarello2, Joseph T Breen1, Myles L Pensak1, Ravi N Samy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Compare outcomes for patients who were seen via telemedicine visits after otology/neurotology surgical procedures with those who were seen in traditional office visits. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case review.
SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent otologic/neurotologic surgery and were seen in at least one telemedicine visit for postoperative care. INTERVENTION (S): Telemedicine visit for postoperative care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE (S): Comparison of the number of patient calls, unplanned visits, and delayed complications between telemedicine patients and controls matched for age, procedure, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients were seen in telemedicine visits postoperatively after the following otologic/neurotologic surgical procedures: cochlear implant surgery (10), vestibular schwannoma resection (4), combined middle fossa and transmastoid cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair (2), middle fossa repair of superior canal dehiscence (1), and stapedectomy (1). All telehealth visits were for the second postoperative visit. The mean number of patient calls after surgery was 2.3 for the telemedicine group and 1.9 for matched controls which was not a statistically significant difference (p = 0.466). Both groups each had two patients who went to the emergency room, with one in each group being admitted. There was one delayed complication in the control group.
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary experience suggests telemedicine may be used safely in caring for patients after otologic/neurotologic surgery, though it may be associated with more patient phone calls. Further study and experience, including assessing patient satisfaction, will clarify the future role of telemedicine in otology and neurotology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32925860     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  6 in total

1.  Utility of telephone visits at an urban safety-net hospital during 2020: A retrospective review.

Authors:  Eric K Kim; Joseph Kidane; Shauna Brodie; Delphine S Tuot; Jeffrey D Sharon
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-30

2.  Utility of Telemedicine for Diagnosis and Management of Laryngology-Related Complaints during COVID-19.

Authors:  Janet S Choi; Victoria Yin; Franklin Wu; Neel K Bhatt; Karla O'Dell; Michael Johns
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.970

3.  Adherence to Long-Term Follow-up in Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas Managed With Serial Observation.

Authors:  Mallory Raymond; Arian Ghanouni; Kaitlyn Brooks; Sarah M Clark; Douglas E Mattox
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-08-09

4.  Vestibular Rehabilitation Telehealth During the SAEA-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Authors:  Regan G Harrell; Michael C Schubert; Sara Oxborough; Susan L Whitney
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  COVID-19 and the resurgence of telehealth in otolaryngology.

Authors:  Christina H Fang; Richard V Smith
Journal:  Oper Tech Otolayngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-04-28

6.  Experience with Obese Patients Followed via Telemedicine in a Latin American Tertiary Care Medical Center.

Authors:  Alejandro López; Maria Fernanda Escobar; Alejandra Urbano; Juliana Alarcón; Laura Libreros-Peña; Diana Marcela Martinez-Ruiz; Luz Ángela Casas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.