| Literature DB >> 32924433 |
Emanuele Marino1,2, Alice Sciortino3, Annemarie Berkhout4, Katherine E MacArthur5, Marc Heggen5, Tom Gregorkiewicz1, Thomas E Kodger1,6, Antonio Capretti1, Christopher B Murray2,7, A Femius Koenderink1,4, Fabrizio Messina3, Peter Schall1.
Abstract
Semiconductor nanocrystals, or quantum dots (QDs), simultaneously benefit from inexpensive low-temperature solution processing and exciting photophysics, making them the ideal candidates for next-generation solar cells and photodetectors. While the working principles of these devices rely on light absorption, QDs intrinsically belong to the Rayleigh regime and display optical behavior limited to electric dipole resonances, resulting in low absorption efficiencies. Increasing the absorption efficiency of QDs, together with their electronic and excitonic coupling to enhance charge carrier mobility, is therefore of critical importance to enable practical applications. Here, we demonstrate a general and scalable approach to increase both light absorption and excitonic coupling of QDs by fabricating hierarchical metamaterials. We assemble QDs into crystalline supraparticles using an emulsion template and demonstrate that these colloidal supercrystals (SCs) exhibit extended resonant optical behavior resulting in an enhancement in absorption efficiency in the visible range of more than 2 orders of magnitude with respect to the case of dispersed QDs. This successful light trapping strategy is complemented by the enhanced excitonic coupling observed in ligand-exchanged SCs, experimentally demonstrated through ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy and leading to the formation of a free biexciton system on sub-picosecond time scales. These results introduce a colloidal metamaterial designed by self-assembly from the bottom up, simultaneously featuring a combination of nanoscale and mesoscale properties leading to simultaneous photonic and excitonic coupling, therefore presenting the nanocrystal analogue of supramolecular structures.Entities:
Keywords: Mie theory; nanocrystals; quantum dots; self-assembly; supercrystals; supraparticles; transient absorption
Year: 2020 PMID: 32924433 PMCID: PMC7596773 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c06188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Nano ISSN: 1936-0851 Impact factor: 15.881
Figure 1Quantum dot supercrystals (QD SCs) and their interaction with light. (a) Schematic representation of the interaction of light with dispersed QDs (left) and a QD SC (right). As dielectric nanoparticles, QDs feature low absorption efficiencies, Cabs/Cgeo ≪ 1, while assembling QDs into SCs results in resonant light-matter photonic coupling and more efficient light absorption, Cabs/Cgeo ∼ 1. Furthermore, the close-packed arrangement of QDs promotes interdot excitonic coupling. (b–d) Structure and morphology of the fabricated CdSe QD SCs. (b) Structure factor of QD SCs extracted from the small-angle X-ray scattering pattern of a dispersion of QD SCs. Inset: Form factor as measured from a dilute dispersion of the CdSe QDs. (c) Transmission electron micrograph of a single QD SC. The inset shows the fast-Fourier transform of the SC, revealing 6-fold symmetry. (d) Transmission electron micrograph showing QD ordering near the surface of the SC.
Figure 2Absorption cross section of QD SCs in air based on Mie theory and experimentally measured. (a) Map of the absorption efficiency of CdSe QD SCs as a function of excitation wavelength, λ, and SC diameter, σ, as modeled from Mie theory. The dotted white line describes the imaginary part of the refractive index of QDs used in the modeling, k, while the full white line describes the resonant threshold σ = λ/n(λ). (b) Size cuts of the absorption efficiency of QD SCs for various excitation wavelengths in the visible range. The inset shows that for σ ≪ λ/n the Rayleigh behavior is retained: Cabs/Cgeo ∼ σ.[30] (c) Map of the electric field energy density, uE ≈ n(λ)2|E|2, within and in proximity of QD SCs for λ = 400 nm. The geometric cross sections of SCs are outlined by the dotted white lines, with diameters iσλ = iλ/n(λ) ≈ i220 nm, i = 1–6. The directions of the incident plane wave, kinc, and of the electric field, E, are specified in the inset. Scale bars indicate λ/2. The absorption cross section density is obtained by multiplying uE by [n(λ) k(λ)]/[n(λ)2 – k(λ)2] ≈ 0.05 at λ = 400 nm. (d) Spectral cuts of the absorption cross section of QD SCs for diameters matching (c). (e) Experimentally determined absorption cross sections of QDs dispersed (black) and assembled into SCs (red). The cross section values in (d) and (e) have been normalized to the first exciton peak to enable comparison between modeled and experimental data.
Figure 3Experimental scattering spectra and simulated scattering cross sections of individual QD SCs. (a) Dark-field scattering spectra of individual QD SCs of various diameters determined by scanning electron microscopy (colored full lines, corresponding diameter indicated). The spectra were collected from SCs deposited on a lithographically checkerboard-patterned silicon substrate to allow accurate SC sizing in the electron microscope (Figure S6). For reference, the imaginary part of the refractive index of dispersed QDs, k, is shown (black dotted line). (b) Mie theory modeled scattering cross sections of individual QD SCs of diameters matching panel (a). To reproduce the embedding medium (air and silicon), we averaged the theoretical spectra of SCs embedded in air and in silicon (Figure S8).[47] (c) Dark-field images of the QD SCs investigated in panel (a). Light is collected from the solid angle subtended by a section 10 μm wide at the center of the image.
Figure 4Ultrafast dynamics reveal enhanced excitonic coupling in QD SCs. (a) Map of the negative TA signal for oleate-capped QDs dispersed in hexane. The imaginary part of the refractive index, k, is also indicated (dotted line). (b) Temporal cuts of panel (a) showing the kinetic behavior at λ = 620 nm and 650 nm. The inset shows the expected dependence of the amplitude ratio A/B on the biexciton binding energy, Δ, normalized to the half-width at half-maximum (HWHM) of the 1S transition.[50,52] (c) Spectral cuts of the negative TA signal at delay times 0.13 ps (full lines) and 2.8 ps (dashed lines) for different QD samples described in the text. (d) Values of biexciton binding energy, Δ, extracted from the data shown in (c) and the expected values shown in the inset in (b).