To improve the photophysical performance of colloidal quantum dots for laser applications, sophisticated core/shell geometries have been developed. Typically, a wider bandgap semiconductor is added as a shell to enhance the gain from the quantum-dot core. This shell is designed to electronically isolate the core, funnel excitons to it, and reduce nonradiative Auger recombination. However, the shell could also potentially provide a secondary source of gain, leading to further versatility in these materials. Here we develop high-quality quantum-dot ring lasers that not only exhibit lasing from both the core and the shell but also the ability to switch between them. We fabricate ring resonators (with quality factors up to ∼2500) consisting only of CdSe/CdS/ZnS core/shell/shell quantum dots using a simple template-stripping process. We then examine lasing as a function of the optical excitation power and ring radius. In resonators with quality factors >1000, excitons in the CdSe cores lead to red lasing with thresholds at ∼25 μJ/cm2. With increasing power, green lasing from the CdS shell emerges (>100 μJ/cm2) and then the red lasing begins to disappear (>250 μJ/cm2). We present a rate-equation model that can explain this color switching as a competition between exciton localization into the core and stimulated emission from excitons in the shell. Moreover, by lowering the quality factor of the cavity we can engineer the device to exhibit only green lasing. The mechanism demonstrated here provides a potential route toward color-switchable quantum-dot lasers.
To improve the photophysical performance of colloidal quantum dots for laser applications, sophisticated core/shell geometries have been developed. Typically, a wider bandgap semiconductor is added as a shell to enhance the gain from the quantum-dot core. This shell is designed to electronically isolate the core, funnel excitons to it, and reduce nonradiative Auger recombination. However, the shell could also potentially provide a secondary source of gain, leading to further versatility in these materials. Here we develop high-quality quantum-dot ring lasers that not only exhibit lasing from both the core and the shell but also the ability to switch between them. We fabricate ring resonators (with quality factors up to ∼2500) consisting only of CdSe/CdS/ZnS core/shell/shell quantum dots using a simple template-stripping process. We then examine lasing as a function of the optical excitation power and ring radius. In resonators with quality factors >1000, excitons in the CdSe cores lead to red lasing with thresholds at ∼25 μJ/cm2. With increasing power, green lasing from the CdS shell emerges (>100 μJ/cm2) and then the red lasing begins to disappear (>250 μJ/cm2). We present a rate-equation model that can explain this color switching as a competition between exciton localization into the core and stimulated emission from excitons in the shell. Moreover, by lowering the quality factor of the cavity we can engineer the device to exhibit only green lasing. The mechanism demonstrated here provides a potential route toward color-switchable quantum-dot lasers.
Nanoscale semiconductors, such
as nanocrystals,[1] nanowires,[2] and monolayers,[3] provide
useful new gain media for lasers.[4−6] Among these, spherical
nanocrystals, known as colloidal quantum dots (QDs), are arguably
the most developed material.[4,7] QDs can now be grown
from a variety of semiconductors with good control of size and shape.[8] Due to their solution processability and size-tunable
optical transitions, they offer a versatile gain material for use
throughout the visible and infrared spectrum.[9] In the presence of optical feedback, these materials can enable
lasing from single excitons,[7,10,11] provide continuous-wave operation,[12,13] low-threshold
amplification,[14,15] and even spasing.[16]These developments have been possible
because of improvements in
the gain properties of QDs. Specifically, nanocrystals are now routinely
coated with shells of a wider-bandgap material.[17−24] When these core/shell particles are excited by photons with energies
above the bandgap of the shell, the shell effectively acts as an antenna
that absorbs light and channels excitons to the core on a picosecond
time scale (Figure a). Because such structures suppress nonradiative Auger recombination,[25−27] core/shell systems have led to some of the lowest reported lasing
thresholds.[15,27] In addition, the relaxation of
the photoexcited carriers from the wider bandgap shell to the core
can give rise to new effects.[28,29] For example, in specific
QD geometries, green (amplified) spontaneous emission from a CdS shell
was shown to dominate radiation from a CdSe core under strong excitation.[27,30]
Figure 1
Fabrication
of quantum-dot (QD) ring resonators. (a) Normalized
absorption (ABS) and photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the thick-shell
CdSe/CdS/ZnS core/shell/shell QDs. The inset of the figure shows a
sketch of the QD geometry, which consists of a 3.2 nm diameter CdSe
core (red), a 12 monolayer CdS shell (green), and a 2 monolayer ZnS
shell (blue). The CdS/ZnS interface is partially alloyed.[23] When an exciton is created in the shell, the
hole (black circle) localizes rapidly (in ∼1 ps) to the core
while the electron is more delocalized. (b) Schematic overview of
the fabrication process. The steps I–V are discussed in the
text. Dark gray indicates the Si template, orange indicates the quantum
dots, purple indicates the adhesive tape, and blue indicates the epoxy
glue. (c) Scanning electron micrographs of a QD ring resonator. The
ring diameter and width are 5 μm and 500 nm, respectively.
Fabrication
of quantum-dot (QD) ring resonators. (a) Normalized
absorption (ABS) and photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the thick-shell
CdSe/CdS/ZnS core/shell/shell QDs. The inset of the figure shows a
sketch of the QD geometry, which consists of a 3.2 nm diameter CdSe
core (red), a 12 monolayer CdS shell (green), and a 2 monolayer ZnS
shell (blue). The CdS/ZnS interface is partially alloyed.[23] When an exciton is created in the shell, the
hole (black circle) localizes rapidly (in ∼1 ps) to the core
while the electron is more delocalized. (b) Schematic overview of
the fabrication process. The steps I–V are discussed in the
text. Dark gray indicates the Si template, orange indicates the quantum
dots, purple indicates the adhesive tape, and blue indicates the epoxy
glue. (c) Scanning electron micrographs of a QD ring resonator. The
ring diameter and width are 5 μm and 500 nm, respectively.Here, our goal is to exploit the
competition between direct emission
from the shell and relaxation into the core in a high-quality QD laser.
Specifically, we examine whether it can lead to active color control,
in which the output wavelength of the laser changes with excitation
power. We find that such “color switching” of the device
is possible. That is, we show that thick-shell QDs can switch from
lasing from the core (around 610 nm) to lasing from the shell (as
short as 500 nm). Furthermore, by lowering the cavity quality factor,
we can engineer the cavity to lase only at the shell wavelength. Finally,
we develop a rate-equation model and use it to identify the competing
processes that give rise to the color-switching behavior of our QD
lasers.For such experiments, we require high-quality optical
cavities
to provide the critical feedback upon which device performance depends.
Surprisingly, despite the vast number of studies on the optimization
of QD gain, the influence of the cavity on QD-laser processes remains
mostly unexplored. Many studies exploit simple fabrication methods
that provide limited control over the cavity geometry.[4,11,26,31−35] For example, it is common to use random or “coffee-stain”
cavities. It would be better to employ a fabrication approach that
allows multiple well-defined micron-scale QD resonators on a single
chip. We develop such a method to investigate active color control
of core/shell QD lasers. More generally, this approach also allows
the study of how cavity design impacts laser performance.To
fabricate high-quality resonators, we use QD template stripping,[36] a simple technique that enables the fabrication
of structured QD surfaces. We extend this approach to the fabrication
of micron-scale laser cavities (see Figure b). In brief (see Supporting Information for details), we use electron-beam lithography
and reactive-ion etching to create an array of circular rings (∼500
nm deep) on a silicon (Si) template (step I, Figure b). The Si template is then coated with a
dense alkane-terminated self-assembled monolayer to reduce the surface
energy of the template and later facilitate the release of our structured
QD surfaces (see Supporting Information for more details). After this treatment, we spin-coat 12 nm diameter
CdSe/CdS/ZnS core/shell/shell QDs (see the inset of Figure a) on top of the template (step
II, Figure b). This
fills the rings and covers the Si surface with a smooth layer of QDs.
To improve the confinement of the cavity modes in the final device,
we remove excess QDs on top of the Si template using adhesive tape,
leaving behind only the QDs inside the rings (step III, Figure b). We then attach a glass
slide to the back of the QDs with an ultraviolet-light-curable epoxy
in between. This allows us to strip off the QDs from the Si template
using mechanical cleavage (step IV, Figure b). The final structure is an array of QD
rings on a transparent backing (step V, Figure b).This fabrication approach produces
ring cavities with high yield.
The structural quality of these rings is confirmed via scanning electron
microscopy (Figure c) as well as fluorescence microscopy (see below). Using atomic force
microscopy (AFM), we measured a root-mean-squared surface roughness
as low as 4.2 nm. This indicates that we obtain cavities with high
surface quality and reduced scattering losses, even though the structure
consists only of QDs.In general, the relevant photon-loss mechanisms
in QD ring cavities
will be leakage, QD absorption, and scattering by defects.[37] Leakage is an intrinsic loss mechanism for ring
resonators that increases with decreasing ring radius. Reabsorption
of red emission by the CdSe QD cores is reduced due to the large volume
fraction of the resonator occupied by the wide-bandgap CdS/ZnS shell
materials, which are transparent to red light. Finally, scattering
by (surface) defects limits the maximum attainable photon lifetime
in the cavity. This is reduced by our high-quality fabrication.Losses in our resonators can be quantified in terms of the quality
factor, Q = ω/Δω = ωτc/2, where ω is the angular frequency
of the light, Δω is the full width at half-maximum (fwhm)
of the cavity resonance, and τc is the cavity decay
time. To measure Q, we used the photoluminescence
of the QDs as a built-in source to couple light into the cavity. That
is, we focused a weak excitation laser on the ring and collected the
leakage radiation from another spot on the ring, sufficiently far
from the excitation to avoid direct luminescence. The spectra collected
for rings with radii ranging from 0.5 to 7.0 μm are shown in Figure a. They exhibit a
broad background peak with sharper features riding on top. The broad
background is due to spontaneous free-space emission of the QDs in
the detection volume. The sharper features are caused by leakage (i.e.,
scattering of photons) from cavity modes. The line width of each peak
depends on the Q of the corresponding cavity mode
with broader peaks signifying lower Q’s. For
all ring radii, we observe broader resonances at shorter wavelengths.
We attribute this to increased reabsorption losses (see Figure a) and increased scattering
losses.[38] Hence, the sharpest peaks and
highest Q’s occur at longer wavelengths. By
fitting Lorentzian line shapes to the sharpest peaks in the spectrum
of each resonator, we find that the cavity Q ranges
from 484 (corresponding to τc = 2 ps) at a ring radius
of 1 μm to 2443 (τc = 10 ps) at 7 μm
(Figure b). We note
that this maximum Q is almost 1 order of magnitude
larger than typical Q’s reported for QD resonators.[39] Thus, the long cavity lifetimes and tunability
of the QD ring resonators make them an interesting candidate for laser
studies.
Figure 2
Optical characterization of QD ring resonators. (a) Leakage spectra
for rings with radii (R) from 0.5 to 5.0 μm.
(b) Q factors obtained via a Lorentzian fit to the
narrowest peaks in the leakage spectra shown in (a). The inset shows
a fit (black line) of two closely spaced Lorentzian peaks (blue lines)
in the spectrum (thick gray line) from 637 to 639 nm for a ring with
a radius of 6 μm.
Optical characterization of QD ring resonators. (a) Leakage spectra
for rings with radii (R) from 0.5 to 5.0 μm.
(b) Q factors obtained via a Lorentzian fit to the
narrowest peaks in the leakage spectra shown in (a). The inset shows
a fit (black line) of two closely spaced Lorentzian peaks (blue lines)
in the spectrum (thick gray line) from 637 to 639 nm for a ring with
a radius of 6 μm.To achieve the population inversion required for lasing,
we illuminated
the entire ring with ultrafast laser pulses at 405 nm (see Supporting Information). The cavity spectra show
several striking features as a function of pulse energy (Figure a,b). To describe
this behavior, we divide the spectra into four regimes labeled I through
IV in Figure . Below
the lasing threshold of 22 μJ/cm2, they show only
spontaneous emission (regime I). The photoluminescence decay traces
at these pulse powers (Figure c) are multiexponential, indicating a contribution of biexciton
emission that decays on a 100–1000 ps time scale because of
rapid Auger recombination (see also Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). Indeed, a significant biexciton
population is expected in the QDs just below threshold, which we estimate
(see Supporting Information) to occur at
an average exciton occupancy per QD of ⟨N⟩
= 1.6 (see ⟨N⟩ axis in Figure a). Above threshold (regime
II), a series of sharp laser peaks near 610 nm appear in the emission
spectrum in combination with very fast (<100 ps) components in
the decay curve due to stimulated emission. With a further increase
of excitation power, the intensity of these laser peaks and the amplitude
of the fast decay component continue to grow, until the red lasing
begins to saturate at around 80 μJ/cm2 (⟨N⟩ = 5.9). This is accompanied by the emergence at
110 μJ/cm2 (⟨N⟩ =
8.4) of new green lasing peaks near 530 nm. Then, at even higher pulse
powers (regime III), the red lasing peaks and the fast decay components
begin to disappear. The green lasing peaks grow in intensity, and
eventually dominate the device output (regime IV). Real-color images
recorded with a commercial digital camera (Figure d) reveal that the appearance of the ring
completely changes in the transition from red spontaneous emission
(regime I) to red (II), orange (III), and green (IV) lasing.
Figure 3
Characterization
of lasing from 4 μm radius quantum dot ring
lasers at room temperature in ambient for four excitation power regimes,
labeled I through IV. (a) Dependence of the emission spectra on excitation
power, P. The associated average exciton occupancy
per QD, ⟨N⟩, is shown on the gray axis
on the left of the plot. (b) Four representative spectra taken from
the data in (a). The excitation powers are 5.3, 74, 260, and 600 μJ/cm2 for I–IV, respectively. (c) Excitation-power dependence
of photoluminescence decay traces measured at 610 nm. (d) True-color
photographs of another 4 μm radius QD ring laser excited in
the power regimes, I–IV. The spectra in (a) and (b) and the
decay traces in (c) are colored according to CIE 1931 to match their
perceived colors.
Characterization
of lasing from 4 μm radius quantum dot ring
lasers at room temperature in ambient for four excitation power regimes,
labeled I through IV. (a) Dependence of the emission spectra on excitation
power, P. The associated average exciton occupancy
per QD, ⟨N⟩, is shown on the gray axis
on the left of the plot. (b) Four representative spectra taken from
the data in (a). The excitation powers are 5.3, 74, 260, and 600 μJ/cm2 for I–IV, respectively. (c) Excitation-power dependence
of photoluminescence decay traces measured at 610 nm. (d) True-color
photographs of another 4 μm radius QD ring laser excited in
the power regimes, I–IV. The spectra in (a) and (b) and the
decay traces in (c) are colored according to CIE 1931 to match their
perceived colors.These results demonstrate
that color switching is possible in lasers
made from core/shell QDs. This color switching is dependent on the
cavity radius and thereby the cavity loss rate. Figure , which plots the red and green emission
as a function of excitation power, shows that red lasing occurs only
for ring radii of 2.5 μm or larger, corresponding to Qs above 950. The thresholds are typically 30–40
μJ/cm2. In contrast, green lasing emerges for all
radii at an excitation power of ∼400 μJ/cm2. The green stimulated emission is even able to overcome cavity losses
at a radius of 0.5 μm, where the Qs were so
low that we could not observe a clear resonance in the leakage spectra
at low excitation powers (see Figure a).
Figure 4
Excitation-power (P) dependence of red
and green
emission from quantum-dot ring lasers of various radii (R). The red curve denotes emission integrated between 600 and 630
nm; the green curve emission between 500 and 520 nm.
Excitation-power (P) dependence of red
and green
emission from quantum-dot ring lasers of various radii (R). The red curve denotes emission integrated between 600 and 630
nm; the green curve emission between 500 and 520 nm.We now analyze the origin of the color switching.
We hypothesize
that it arises due to a competition between stimulated emission from
the shell and charge-carrier transfer from the CdS/ZnS shell to the
core. Nonresonant excitation (in our experiments at 405 nm) generates
electron–hole pairs primarily in the CdS/ZnS shell because
of its large volume compared to the core. Charge carriers rapidly
cool to band-edge levels in the shell via the bulk-like density of
states. Subsequently, charge-carrier transfer from the shell to the
core occurs on a picosecond time scale depending on the details of
the core/shell geometry.[40−44] The resulting “core-localized” excitons consist of
a tightly confined hole and an electron that is partially delocalized
into the shell, as set by the quasi-type-II band structure of our
QDs.[45]At the lower excitation powers
in our experiments (20–200
μJ/cm2 in Figure a), excitons generated in the CdS shell transfer to
the CdSe core on a picosecond time scale and create population inversion
in the core, leading to red lasing. For similar QD architectures,
excitation powers of a few 100 μJ/cm2 give rise to
green amplified spontaneous emission.[42] We propose that in our system at excitation powers >200 μJ/cm2 (see Figure a), green stimulated emission by excitons in the shell occurs on
a subpicosecond time scale, outpacing exciton transfer into the core.
Consequently, at these powers the population of core excitons never
reaches inversion and red lasing does not occur. This explains why
the red lasing disappears as the green lasing emerges. Furthermore,
this picture explains the orange color in Figure d. In this intermediate regime, the excitation
power yields a stimulated-emission rate from the shell similar to
the exciton-transfer rate to the core, and simultaneous green and
red lasing is observed.Indeed, using a simple rate-equation
model for the competition
between stimulated emission from the shell and exciton transfer to
the core (Figure ),
we can reproduce the observed color switching. We include explicitly
only QD states with zero, one, or two electron–hole pairs.
We assume that higher multiexciton states decay immediately through
Auger recombination pathways. Importantly, our model distinguishes
between excitons in the CdS shell and those in the CdSe core. This
leads to six possible states for a QD, each with a different number
of excitons in the core and shell, as depicted in Figure a. The transition rates between
these states scale with the number of recombination possibilities
of the carriers. To account for the strong interaction between carriers
in the core, we also take the spin degeneracy of the core energy levels
into account for reabsorption and stimulated emission (see Supporting Information for details).
Figure 5
Model explaining
color switching in our quantum-dot ring lasers.
(a) Schematic depicting the QD states included in the model with the
localization of excitons indicated with x’s (in the green CdS
shell, or red CdSe core). The solid (dashed) arrows between states
highlight the possible radiative (nonradiative) transitions between
the states. The colors of the arrows are linked to the processes noted
in the legend on the right of the figure, with the red arrow on the
left indicating radiation losses due to scattering from defects in
the ring cavity. (b) The total number of generated red (red curve)
and green (green curve) photons (normalized) versus the average exciton
population per QD, ⟨N⟩, as predicted
by our rate equation model with Q = 1000 (left plot)
and 200 (right plot).
Model explaining
color switching in our quantum-dot ring lasers.
(a) Schematic depicting the QD states included in the model with the
localization of excitons indicated with x’s (in the green CdS
shell, or red CdSe core). The solid (dashed) arrows between states
highlight the possible radiative (nonradiative) transitions between
the states. The colors of the arrows are linked to the processes noted
in the legend on the right of the figure, with the red arrow on the
left indicating radiation losses due to scattering from defects in
the ring cavity. (b) The total number of generated red (red curve)
and green (green curve) photons (normalized) versus the average exciton
population per QD, ⟨N⟩, as predicted
by our rate equation model with Q = 1000 (left plot)
and 200 (right plot).To numerically evaluate this model, we fix the parameters
that
we measure (e.g., the radiative lifetime of single excitons in the
core). For the remaining parameters (e.g., the exciton-localization
rate) we sweep through a range of values based on the literature (see Table S1 in the Supporting Information). Within
this range, our model reproduces the lasing behavior that we observe
experimentally. The left plot in Figure b shows the predicted red and green emission
intensities as a function of exciton population ⟨N⟩ for a high-Q cavity (Q = 1000). In agreement with our experiments (Figure ), red lasing begins at an exciton population
of just above ⟨N⟩ = 1 and then switches
to green lasing at higher populations. Furthermore, like in experiment,
the red lasing threshold is barely affected by the cavity Q, unless it is below a certain value. For example, if the Q used in the model is below ∼200, only green stimulated
emission can overcome the increased cavity losses (right plot, Figure b). In such cavities,
only green lasing is predicted, in agreement with observations.Although the model reproduces the qualitative behavior of our devices,
the exact predicted values for the thresholds and output intensities
differ with experiment, presumably due to our simplifying assumptions.
In particular, we limit our QDs to two excitons or fewer, while in
the experiment green lasing occurs at occupations higher than ⟨N⟩ = 8. To compensate for this difference, the model
must overestimate the green (and possibly red) stimulated emission
cross sections. Nonetheless, the qualitative agreement suggests that
our rate-equation model captures the most important processes that
are responsible for the observed color switching.Because the
relevant processes occur on ultrafast time scales,
we can potentially switch the color of the QD laser at ultrafast speeds.
This would require that both the build-up and ring-down of light in
the cavity occur on picosecond time scales. Indeed, all of our ring
cavities show cavity lifetimes (and hence ring-down times) that are
less than 10 ps. Furthermore, we know that the green stimulated emission
at strong excitation (⟨N⟩ > 10)
builds
up on subps time scales because we observe green lasing in all of
our cavities. If this build up were slower, green stimulated emission
would not be able to outcompete the shortest cavity decay times of
∼1 ps (Figure ). In contrast, the red (i.e., core) stimulated emission overcomes
losses only for cavities with lifetimes above ∼5 ps (Figure ). We conclude that
the typical build-up time for red lasing is on the order of a few
picoseconds. Thus, the color should be tunable from red to green laser
emission at picosecond time scales with switching speeds approaching
the terahertz regime.We have fabricated high-quality QD ring
resonators that enable
unique color switching between red and green laser emission. This
switching occurs because green simulated emission from the CdS shell
outpaces the exciton localization into the CdSe core. This prevents
the core from reaching population inversion. Although similar QDs
have been used in many lasing experiments, this effect has not been
reported. This may be due to the Q’s of our
cavities, which are higher than most reported in literature. More
importantly, many previous experiments relied on random cavities,
in which the lasing modes for core and shell emission did not spatially
overlap (see, e.g., ref (29).). Because the observed color switching relies on the competition
between emission from the core and shell, the different spatial extension
of the modes may have previously prevented color switching. Alternatively,
in distributed Bragg reflector systems only a single resonance is
present and lasing at multiple wavelengths is suppressed. In contrast,
our ring lasers are well suited to the observation of the transition
from red to green QD lasing because of their high quality and strong
modal overlap. Tuning the nonradiative Auger and charge-localization
rates by optimizing the shell volume and core/shell interface geometry
can aid the further development of color switching. Finally, the model
that we developed can lead to the rational design of QDs with controlled
radiative and nonradiative rates, as well as fast color-switchable[46−49] or white-light lasers.[10,50−52] Such devices, ideally of small dimensions, can drive novel techniques
for biological and chemical sensing,[53] laser
imaging and displays,[54] and wavelength-division
multiplexing.[55,56]
Authors: Giuseppe Strangi; Valentin Barna; Roberto Caputo; Antonio De Luca; Carlo Versace; Nicola Scaramuzza; Cesare Umeton; Roberto Bartolino; Gabriel Noam Price Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2005-02-17 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Victor I Klimov; Sergei A Ivanov; Jagjit Nanda; Marc Achermann; Ilya Bezel; John A McGuire; Andrei Piryatinski Journal: Nature Date: 2007-05-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Valerio Pinchetti; Francesco Meinardi; Andrea Camellini; Gianluca Sirigu; Sotirios Christodoulou; Wan Ki Bae; Francesco De Donato; Liberato Manna; Margherita Zavelani-Rossi; Iwan Moreels; Victor I Klimov; Sergio Brovelli Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Fengjia Fan; Oleksandr Voznyy; Randy P Sabatini; Kristopher T Bicanic; Michael M Adachi; James R McBride; Kemar R Reid; Young-Shin Park; Xiyan Li; Ankit Jain; Rafael Quintero-Bermudez; Mayuran Saravanapavanantham; Min Liu; Marek Korkusinski; Pawel Hawrylak; Victor I Klimov; Sandra J Rosenthal; Sjoerd Hoogland; Edward H Sargent Journal: Nature Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Stephan J P Kress; Jian Cui; Patrik Rohner; David K Kim; Felipe V Antolinez; Karl-Augustin Zaininger; Sriharsha V Jayanti; Patrizia Richner; Kevin M McPeak; Dimos Poulikakos; David J Norris Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Federico Montanarella; Darius Urbonas; Luke Chadwick; Pepijn G Moerman; Patrick J Baesjou; Rainer F Mahrt; Alfons van Blaaderen; Thilo Stöferle; Daniel Vanmaekelbergh Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Ward van der Stam; Gianluca Grimaldi; Jaco J Geuchies; Solrun Gudjonsdottir; Pieter T van Uffelen; Mandy van Overeem; Baldur Brynjarsson; Nicholas Kirkwood; Arjan J Houtepen Journal: Chem Mater Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 9.811
Authors: Emanuele Marino; Alice Sciortino; Annemarie Berkhout; Katherine E MacArthur; Marc Heggen; Tom Gregorkiewicz; Thomas E Kodger; Antonio Capretti; Christopher B Murray; A Femius Koenderink; Fabrizio Messina; Peter Schall Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 15.881