| Literature DB >> 32923482 |
Nayana Gunathilaka1, Hirunika Perera1, Tharaka Wijerathna1, Wasana Rodrigo2, N D A D Wijegunawardana3.
Abstract
Phlebotomus argentipes is the main suspected vector for leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka. Investigations on the presence of aerobic bacteria in the gut of sand flies which evidence a potential approach to control leishmaniasis transmission through a paratransgenic strategy are still not available for the local sand fly populations. Field-caught unfed female sand flies collected from three selected Medical Officer of Health (MOH) areas (Polpithigama, Maho, and Galgamuwa) in Kurunegala District, Sri Lanka from August to December 2018 were used. Prokaryotic 16S ribosomal RNA partial gene was amplified and sequenced. Morphological identification revealed the presence of only one sand fly species, P. argentipes (n = 1,969). A total of 20 organisms belonging to two phyla (Proteobactericea and Furmicutes) were detected within the gut microbial community of the studied sand fly specimens. This study documents the first-ever observation of Rhizobium sp. in the midgut of P. argentipes. The presence of Bacillus megaterium, which is considered as a nonpathogenic bacterium with potential use for paratransgenic manipulation of P. argentipes suggest that it may be used as a delivery vehicle to block the vectorial transmission of Leishmania parasites. In addition, Serratia marcescens may be used as a potential candidate to block the parasite development in sand fly vectors since it has evidenced antileishmanial activities in previous investigations. Hence, further studies are required to gain full insight into the potential use of this bacterium in the control of Leishmania parasites through paratransgenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32923482 PMCID: PMC7453272 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5458063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1The area map indicating the surveillance sites.
Abundance of sand flies among different localities in Kurunegala District.
| Collection site | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maho | 75 | 7 | 82 |
| Galgamuwa | 186 | 33 | 219 |
| Polpithigama | 1,539 | 129 | 1,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2Some bacterial colonies isolated from the midgut grown on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar.
Characterization of bacteria based on morphology and biochemical investigations.
| Isolate no. | Gram's stain | Cell shape | Motility | Aerobic growth | Anaerobic growth | Oxidase | Catalase | Acid production | Oxidative/fermentative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PaKu-1 | − | R | + | + | + | − | + | + | F |
| PaKu-2 | − | R | + | + | + | − | + | + | F |
| PaKu-3 | + | S | − | + | + | − | + | + | F |
| PaKu-4 | − | R | D | + | + | − | + | + | F |
| PaKu-5 | − | R | D | + | + | − | + | + | F |
| PaKu-6 | + | S | − | + | + | − | + | + | F |
| PaKu-7 | − | R | + | + | − | + | + | − | − |
| PaKu-8 | − | R | + | + | − | + | + | − | − |
| PaKu-9 | + | S | − | + | + | − | + | + | F |
| PaKu-10 | − | R | + | + | + | + | + | + | F |
| PaKu-11 | − | R | + | + | + | + | + | + | F |
| PaKu-12 | + | S | − | + | + | − | + | + | F |
| PaKu-13 | + | R | + | + | − | − | + | + | − |
| PaKu-14 | − | R | + | + | − | − | + | + | O |
| PaKu-15 | − | R | + | + | + | − | + | − | O |
| PaKu-16 | − | R | + | + | + | − | + | − | − |
| PaKu-17 | − | R | + | + | + | − | + | − | − |
| PaKu-18 | + | R | + | + | + | − | − | − | − |
| PaKu-19 | + | R | + | + | + | − | + | + | − |
| PaKu-20 | − | R | − | + | + | − | + | + | F |
| PaKu-21 | + | R | + | + | − | − | + | + | − |
| PaKu-22 | + | R | + | + | − | − | + | + | F |
| PaKu-23 | + | S | − | + | − | − | − | + | F |
| PaKu-24 | + | R | + | + | + | − | + | + | − |
| PaKu-25 | + | R | + | + | − | − | + | + | − |
| PaKu-26 | − | R | + | + | + | − | + | − | − |
R: rod; S: spirillum; +: positive; −: negative; F: fermentative; O: oxidative.
Molecular identification of isolated bacteria from midgut of sand flies.
| Phylum | Genus/species identification | Similarity (%) | Accession numbers | Isolate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firmicutes |
| 100 | MK841545 | PaKu3 |
|
| 100 | MK841316 | PaKu6 | |
|
| 100 | MK841329 | PaKu9 | |
|
| 99 | MK841411 | PaKu12 | |
|
| 100 | MK841412 | PaKu13 | |
|
| 99 | MN067797 | PaKu19 | |
|
| 99 | MN067799 | PaKu21 | |
|
| 100 | MN069586 | PaKu22 | |
|
| 100 | MN067800 | PaKu23 | |
|
| 99 | MN067801 | PaKu24 | |
|
| 100 | MN067802 | PaKu25 | |
|
| ||||
| Proteobacteria |
| 99 | MK841543 | PaKu1 |
|
| 100 | MK841544 | PaKu2 | |
|
| 99 | MK841569 | PaKu4 | |
|
| 100 | MK841570 | PaKu5 | |
|
| 100 | MK841317 | PaKu7 | |
|
| 100 | MK841321 | PaKu8 | |
|
| 100 | MK841331 | PaKu10 | |
|
| 100 | MK841333 | PaKu11 | |
|
| 100 | MN067779 | PaKu14 | |
|
| 100 | MN067780 | PaKu15 | |
|
| 100 | MN067781 | PaKu16 | |
|
| 100 | MN067783 | PaKu17 | |
|
| 100 | MN067796 | PaKu18 | |
|
| 100 | MN069585 | PaKu26 | |
|
| 99 | MN067798 | PaKu20 | |
∗Human pathogens. Rarely pathogenic on humans.
Relative abundance of midgut bacteria encountered in different sand fly pools.
| Genus/species identification | Relative abundance (%) of the organism in the tested insect pools ( |
|---|---|
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 7.69 (2) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 7.69 (2) |
|
| 15.38 (4) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 7.69 (2) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
|
| 3.85 (1) |
Figure 3Phylogenetic analysis of gut microbiota isolated from P. argentipes sand flies verified by partial 16S rRNA gene sequences. Black circle—gut microbes in sand fly species—black triangle—study clones—gut microbes in sand fly (P. argentipes) in Sri Lanka. The sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega Software. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the neighbor-joining algorithm using MEGA7 software. Each bacterial family in the phylogenetic tree is represented by a separate colored line. The scale of the genetic distance is shown underneath.