| Literature DB >> 32921312 |
Monique F M Santana1, Aécio L A Lira1, Raphael S Pinto1,2, Carlos A Minanni1,3, Amanda R M Silva4, Maria I B A C Sawada5, Edna R Nakandakare1, Maria L C Correa-Giannella5,6, Marcia S Queiroz5, Graziella E Ronsein4, Marisa Passarelli7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is associated with lipid derangements that worsen kidney function and enhance cardiovascular (CVD) risk. The management of dyslipidemia, hypertension and other traditional risk factors does not completely prevent CVD complications, bringing up the participation of nontraditional risk factors such as advanced glycation end products (AGEs), carbamoylation and changes in the HDL proteome and functionality. The HDL composition, proteome, chemical modification and functionality were analyzed in nondialysis subjects with DKD categorized according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin excretion rate (AER).Entities:
Keywords: Advanced glycation; Apolipoprotein A-IV; Apolipoprotein D; Atherosclerosis; Carbamoylation; Diabetic kidney disease; HDL; Proteomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32921312 PMCID: PMC7488728 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-020-01381-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Proteins found in the HDL proteome of controls and DKD subjects. 28 proteins were quantified by PRM Targeted Proteomic in HDL from controls and DKD subjects
| Gene name | Protein name | Peptide sequence |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha-1 antitrypsin (A1AT) | LSITGTYDLK | |
| AMBP protein (AMBP) | AFIQLWAFDAVK | |
| Apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) | DYVSQFEGSALGK | |
| Apolipoprotein A-II (apoA-II) | SPELQAEAK | |
| Apolipoprotein A-IV (apoA-IV) | LTPYADEFK | |
| Apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB100) | SVSLPSLDPASAK | |
| Apolipoprotein C-I (apoC-I) | EFGNTLEDK | |
| Apolipoprotein C-II (apoC-II) | ESLSSYWESAK | |
| Apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) | GWVTDGFSSLK | |
| Apolipoprotein C-IV (apoC-IV) | AWFLESK | |
| Apolipoprotein D (apoD) | NILTSNNIDVK | |
| Apolipoprotein E (apoE) | VQAAVGTSAAPVPSDNH | |
| Apolipoprotein F (apoF) | SGVQQLIQYYQDQK | |
| Apolipoprotein H (apoH) | EHSSLAFWK | |
| Apolipoprotein L (apoL) | VAQELEEK | |
| Apolipoprotein M (apoM) | DGLCVPR | |
| C3 complement (CO3) | DFDFVPPVVR | |
| Cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) | ASYPDITGEK | |
| Clusterin (Clus) | LFDSDPITVTVPVEVSR | |
| Lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) | SSGLVSNAPGVQIR | |
| Paraoxonase arylesterase 1 (PON1) | IQNILTEEPK | |
| Paraoxonase lactonase 3 (PON3) | STVEIFK | |
| Phospholip transfer protein (PLTP) | AGALQLLLVGDK | |
| Prenilcystein oxidase 1 (PCYOX) | LFLSYDYAVK | |
| Serum amyloid A-I (SAA1) | GPGGVWAAEAISDAR | |
| Serum amyloid 4 (SAA4) | FRPDGLPK | |
| Transtirretin (TTHY) | GSPAINVAVHVFR |
Anthropometric and clinical data of control subjects and individuals with DKD categorized according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; mL/min/1.73 m2) and albumin excretion rate (AER; A1 = normoalbuminuria, A2 = microalbuminuria; A3 = macroalbuminuria)
| Control eGFR > 60 | DKD eGFR > 60 A1 + A2 | DKD eGFR < 60 A3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n (F/M) | 8 (4/4) | 10 (7/3) | 25 (7/18) |
| Age (years) | 68.5 (58–84) | 68 (53–75) | 69 (55–87) |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) | 84.5 (63–102) | 82.0 (61–131) | 25 (10–46)# |
| AER (mg/g creatinine) | – | 9.5 (2.4–114) | 1128 (317–6430)@ |
| Time of DM (years) | – | 14 (4–26) | 18 (6–30) |
| CVD history (%) | – | 2 (20%) | 11 (44%) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.9 (21–29) | 33 (25–45) * | 27 (21–38) |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.6 (5.0–6.0) | 8.4 (7.0–8.0)# | 8.3 (6.0–10.0) # |
| Fructosamine (μmol/L) | 219 (205–262) | 308 (158–428)& | 331 (329–506) & |
| TC (mg/dL) | 208 (155–290) | 144 (114–186)$ | 154 (92–313) |
| TG (mg/dL) | 111 (71–362) | 88 (64–151) | 148 (78–329) |
| HDLc (mg/dL) | 49 (33–87) | 46 (35–92) | 40 (21–140) |
| CML (μg/mL) | 0.5 (0.3–1.0) | 1.7 (0.5–3.4) | 1.0 (0.7–7.3) |
BMI body mass index, HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides, HDLc HDL cholesterol, CML carboxymethyl-lysine. Results were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test with Holm-Sidak posttest (median - range); * p < 0.004; # p < 0.0001; & p < 0.001 and $ p < 0.006 in comparison to Control GFR > 60, and by Mann- Whitney test; @ p < 0.001 in comparison to eGFR > 60 A1 + A2
Fig. 1Significant proteins in the CKD-HDL proteome. Differentially expressed proteins in the CKD-HDL proteome included apoA-IV and apoD (panels a-b). Comparisons were made by the Kruskal-Wallis test with the Holm-Sidak posttest
Fig. 2HDL composition. The HDL content of total cholesterol, triglycerides and phospholipids was determined by colorimetric enzymatic methods (panels a-c). The results were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test with the Holm-Sidak posttest. Association between HDL-phosphoplipids with eGFR (panel d) was performed by Spearman’s correlation
Fig. 3HDL modification by advanced glycation and carbamoylation. The amount of total AGEs (panel a) and pentosidine (panel b) was determined in HDL by measuring the absorbance in the fluorescence range at 440 nm (total AGEs) and 378 nm (pentosidine) and carbamoylation (panel c) by ELISA. The results were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test with the Holm-Sidak posttest. Associations between HDL chemical modification and AER (panels d and e) were performed by Spearman’s correlation
Fig. 4HDL functionality. (Panel a) Cholesterol efflux: HDL was isolated from subjects with DKD and controls and utilized as an acceptor of cellular cholesterol. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) overloaded with acetylated LDL and 14C-cholesterol were incubated with 50 μg of HDL/mL of medium for 6 h. Cholesterol efflux was determined after measuring the radioactivity in the culture medium and that remaining in cells, which was calculated as 14C-cholesterol in the medium/14C-cholesterol in the medium +14C-cholesterol in cells × 100. Control incubations were performed in the presence of DMEM/FAFA in the absence of HDL, and the results were subtracted from those obtained in the presence of HDL. (Panels b and c) Antioxidant activity: The lag time (panel b) and the maximum rate of LDL oxidation (panel c) were determined in incubations with LDL (40 μg of protein) isolated from a healthy donor with CuSO4 solution and HDL from DKD or controls (80 μg of protein). (Panels d and e) Anti-inflammatory activity: BMDMs overloaded with acetylated LDL (50 μg/mL) were treated with HDL (50 μg/mL) for 24 h. After washing, cells were treated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h, and interleukin-6 (IL-6, panel d) and TNF-alpha (panel e) levels in the medium were determined by ELISA. The results were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test with the Holm-Sidak posttest or Student’s t test
Fig. 5Correlations between apoA-IV and CKD parameters. Correlations were performed using Spearman correlation
Fig. 6Correlations between apoD and parameters of CKD, HDL chemical modification and functionality. Correlations were performed using Spearman correlation