S Deschuymer1, D Nevens1,2, F Duprez3, J F Daisne1,4, M Voordeckers5, W De Neve3, S Nuyts6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kanker Netwerk, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 3. Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU-UCL-Namur, Site Ste-Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. sandra.nuyts@uzleuven.be.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A randomized trial was initiated to investigate whether a reduction of the dose to the elective nodal sites would result in less toxicity and improvement in Quality of Life (QoL) without compromising tumor control. This paper aimed to compare QoL in both treatment arms. METHODS:Two-hundred head and neck cancer patients treated withradiotherapy (RT) or chemo-RT were randomized (all stages, mean age: 60 years, M/F: 82%/18%). The elective nodal volumes of patients randomized in the experimental arm were treated up to a 40 Gy equivalent dose. In the standard arm, the elective nodal volumes were treated up to a 50 Gy equivalent dose. The QoL data were collected using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire QLQ-C30 and the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer module (H&N35). RESULTS: A trend toward less decline in QoL during treatment was observed in the 40 Gy arm compared to the 50 Gy arm. Statistically significant differences for global health status, physical functioning, emotional functioning, speech problems, and trouble with social eating in favor of the 40 Gy arm were observed. A clinically relevant better outcome in the 40 Gy arm was found for physical functioning at the end of therapy. CONCLUSION:QoL during RT for head and neck cancer tends to be less impaired in the 40 Gy arm. However, reducing the dose only on the elective neck does not result in clinically relevant improvement of QoL. Therefore, additional treatment strategies must be examined to further improve the QoL of HNSCC patients.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: A randomized trial was initiated to investigate whether a reduction of the dose to the elective nodal sites would result in less toxicity and improvement in Quality of Life (QoL) without compromising tumor control. This paper aimed to compare QoL in both treatment arms. METHODS: Two-hundred head and neck cancerpatients treated with radiotherapy (RT) or chemo-RT were randomized (all stages, mean age: 60 years, M/F: 82%/18%). The elective nodal volumes of patients randomized in the experimental arm were treated up to a 40 Gy equivalent dose. In the standard arm, the elective nodal volumes were treated up to a 50 Gy equivalent dose. The QoL data were collected using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire QLQ-C30 and the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer module (H&N35). RESULTS: A trend toward less decline in QoL during treatment was observed in the 40 Gy arm compared to the 50 Gy arm. Statistically significant differences for global health status, physical functioning, emotional functioning, speech problems, and trouble with social eating in favor of the 40 Gy arm were observed. A clinically relevant better outcome in the 40 Gy arm was found for physical functioning at the end of therapy. CONCLUSION: QoL during RT for head and neck cancer tends to be less impaired in the 40 Gy arm. However, reducing the dose only on the elective neck does not result in clinically relevant improvement of QoL. Therefore, additional treatment strategies must be examined to further improve the QoL of HNSCCpatients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dose reduction; Elective nodes; Head and neck cancer; Quality of life; Radiotherapy
Authors: Miranda E M C Christianen; Cornelis Schilstra; Ivo Beetz; Christina T Muijs; Olga Chouvalova; Fred R Burlage; Patricia Doornaert; Phil W Koken; C René Leemans; Rico N P M Rinkel; Marieke J de Bruijn; G H de Bock; Jan L N Roodenburg; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Ben J Slotman; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Hendrik P Bijl; Johannes A Langendijk Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Christopher M Nutting; James P Morden; Kevin J Harrington; Teresa Guerrero Urbano; Shreerang A Bhide; Catharine Clark; Elizabeth A Miles; Aisha B Miah; Kate Newbold; MaryAnne Tanay; Fawzi Adab; Sarah J Jefferies; Christopher Scrase; Beng K Yap; Roger P A'Hern; Mark A Sydenham; Marie Emson; Emma Hall Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Peter C Levendag; David N Teguh; Peter Voet; Henri van der Est; Inge Noever; Wilhelmus J M de Kruijf; Inger-Karine Kolkman-Deurloo; Jean-Briac Prevost; Johan Poll; Paul I M Schmitz; Ben J Heijmen Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2007-08-21 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Johannes A Langendijk; Patricia Doornaert; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Charles R Leemans; Neil K Aaronson; Ben J Slotman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sandra Nuyts; Piet Dirix; Paul M J Clement; Vincent Vander Poorten; Pierre Delaere; Joseph Schoenaers; Robert Hermans; Walter Van den Bogaert Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Johannes A Langendijk; Patricia Doornaert; Derek H F Rietveld; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; C René Leemans; Ben J Slotman Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Mitchell Machtay; Jennifer Moughan; Andrew Trotti; Adam S Garden; Randal S Weber; Jay S Cooper; Arlene Forastiere; K Kian Ang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mischa de Ridder; Cornelis P J Raaijmakers; Frank A Pameijer; Remco de Bree; Floris C J Reinders; Patricia A H Doornaert; Chris H J Terhaard; Marielle E P Philippens Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 6.575