Literature DB >> 26351354

Advances in Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer.

Vincent Grégoire1, Johannes A Langendijk2, Sandra Nuyts2.   

Abstract

Over the last few decades, significant improvements have been made in the radiotherapy (RT) treatment of head and neck malignancies. The progressive introduction of intensity-modulated RT and the use of multimodality imaging for target volume and organs at risk delineation, together with the use of altered fractionation regimens and concomitant administration of chemotherapy or targeted agents, have accompanied efficacy improvements in RT. Altogether, such improvements have translated into improvement in locoregional control and overall survival probability, with a decrease in the long-term adverse effects of RT and an improvement in quality of life. Further progress in the treatment of head and neck malignancies may come from a better integration of molecular imaging to identify tumor subvolumes that may require additional radiation doses (ie, dose painting) and from treatment adaptation tracing changes in patient anatomy during treatment. Proton therapy generates even more exquisite dose distribution in some patients, thus potentially further improving patient outcomes. However, the clinical benefit of these approaches, although promising, for patients with head and neck cancer need to be demonstrated in prospective randomized studies. In this context, our article will review some of these advances, with special emphasis on target volume and organ-at-risk delineation, use of molecular imaging for tumor delineation, dose painting for dose escalation, dose adaptation throughout treatment, and potential benefit of proton therapy.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26351354     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  52 in total

1.  Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Photon Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer: First Comparative Results of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Terence T Sio; Huei-Kai Lin; Qiuling Shi; G Brandon Gunn; Charles S Cleeland; J Jack Lee; Mike Hernandez; Pierre Blanchard; Nikhil G Thaker; Jack Phan; David I Rosenthal; Adam S Garden; William H Morrison; C David Fuller; Tito R Mendoza; Radhe Mohan; Xin Shelley Wang; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Revisiting the dose constraints for head and neck OARs in the current era of IMRT.

Authors:  N Patrik Brodin; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  Segmentation of parotid glands from registered CT and MR images.

Authors:  Domen Močnik; Bulat Ibragimov; Lei Xing; Primož Strojan; Boštjan Likar; Franjo Pernuš; Tomaž Vrtovec
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Nodal parameters of FDG PET/CT performed during radiotherapy for locally advanced mucosal primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma can predict treatment outcomes: SUVmean and response rate are useful imaging biomarkers.

Authors:  Peter Lin; Myo Min; Mark Lee; Lois Holloway; Dion Forstner; Victoria Bray; Allan Fowler
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Effectiveness of tomotherapy vs linear accelerator image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized pharyngeal cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a Taiwanese population-based propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Yao-Ching Wang; Chia-Chin Li; Chun-Ru Chien
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Neutrophil-Based Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Dafeng Chu; Xinyue Dong; Xutong Shi; Canyang Zhang; Zhenjia Wang
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  A Quantitative Clinical Decision-Support Strategy Identifying Which Patients With Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer May Benefit the Most From Proton Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  N Patrik Brodin; Rafi Kabarriti; Mark Pankuch; Clyde B Schechter; Vinai Gondi; Shalom Kalnicki; Chandan Guha; Madhur K Garg; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Charged-particle therapy in cancer: clinical uses and future perspectives.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Roberto Orecchia; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  A feasibility study on adaptive 18F-FDG-PET-guided radiotherapy for recurrent and second primary head and neck cancer in the previously irradiated territory.

Authors:  Julie Schatteman; Dirk Van Gestel; Dieter Berwouts; Werner De Gersem; Geert De Kerf; Wilfried De Neve; Bie De Ost; Ana Maria Luiza Olteanu; Sylvie Rottey; Tom Vercauteren; Ingeborg Goethals; Fréderic Duprez
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Effectiveness of tapentadol prolonged release for the management of painful mucositis in head and neck cancers during intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Mazzola Rosario; Ricchetti Francesco; Fersino Sergio; Giaj Levra Niccolò; Fiorentino Alba; Nicodemo Maurizio; Albanese Sergio; Gori Stefania; Alongi Filippo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.