Literature DB >> 32920720

Impact of Borderline Resectability in Pancreatic Head Cancer on Patient Survival: Biology Matters According to the New International Consensus Criteria.

Casper van Eijck1, Stefan Löb2, Friedrich Anger3, Anna Döring3, Jacob van Dam1, Johan Friso Lock3, Ingo Klein3, Max Bittrich4, Christoph-Thomas Germer3,5, Armin Wiegering3,5, Volker Kunzmann4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: International consensus criteria (ICC) have redefined borderline resectability for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) according to three dimensions: anatomical (BR-A), biological (BR-B), and conditional (BR-C). The present definition acknowledges that resectability is not just about the anatomic relationship between the tumour and vessels but that biological and conditional dimensions also are important. <br> METHODS: Patients' tumours were retrospectively defined borderline resectable according to ICC. The study cohort was grouped into either BR-A or BR-B and compared with patients considered primarily resectable (R). Differences in postoperative complications, pathological reports, overall (OS), and disease-free survival were assessed. <br> RESULTS: A total of 345 patients underwent resection for PDAC. By applying ICC in routine preoperative assessment, 30 patients were classified as stage BR-A and 62 patients as stage BR-B. In total, 253 patients were considered R. The cohort did not contain BR-C patients. No differences in postoperative complications were detected. Median OS was significantly shorter in BR-A (15 months) and BR-B (12 months) compared with R (20 months) patients (BR-A vs. R: p = 0.09 and BR-B vs. R: p < 0.001). CA19-9, as the determining factor of BR-B patients, turned out to be an independent prognostic risk factor for OS. <br> CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative staging defining surgical resectability in PDAC according to ICC is crucial for patient survival. Patients with PDAC BR-B should be considered for multimodal neoadjuvant therapy even if considered anatomically resectable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32920720      PMCID: PMC7940298          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09100-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  42 in total

1.  FDG-PET in diagnosis, staging and prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Jun-Qiang Chen; Jin-Lu Liu; Xin-Gan Qin; Yuan Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Staging of pancreatic cancer based on the number of positive lymph nodes.

Authors:  I Tarantino; R Warschkow; T Hackert; B M Schmied; M W Büchler; O Strobel; A Ulrich
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial.

Authors:  Eva Versteijne; Mustafa Suker; Karin Groothuis; Janine M Akkermans-Vogelaar; Marc G Besselink; Bert A Bonsing; Jeroen Buijsen; Olivier R Busch; Geert-Jan M Creemers; Ronald M van Dam; Ferry A L M Eskens; Sebastiaan Festen; Jan Willem B de Groot; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Ignace H de Hingh; Marjolein Y V Homs; Jeanin E van Hooft; Emile D Kerver; Saskia A C Luelmo; Karen J Neelis; Joost Nuyttens; Gabriel M R M Paardekooper; Gijs A Patijn; Maurice J C van der Sangen; Judith de Vos-Geelen; Johanna W Wilmink; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Cornelis J Punt; Casper H van Eijck; Geertjan van Tienhoven
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy.

Authors:  Gauri R Varadhachary; Eric P Tamm; James L Abbruzzese; Henry Q Xiong; Christopher H Crane; Huamin Wang; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Douglas B Evans; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Randomized phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (Prep-02/JSAP05).

Authors:  Fuyuhiko Motoi; Tomoo Kosuge; Hideki Ueno; Hiroki Yamaue; Sohei Satoi; Masayuki Sho; Goro Honda; Ippei Matsumoto; Keita Wada; Junji Furuse; Yutaka Matsuyama; Michiaki Unno
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19.9 in benign hepatobiliary conditions and its correlation with serum bilirubin concentration.

Authors:  S L Ong; A Sachdeva; G Garcea; G Gravante; M S Metcalfe; D M Lloyd; D P Berry; A R Dennison
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  International consensus on definition and criteria of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 2017.

Authors:  Shuji Isaji; Shugo Mizuno; John A Windsor; Claudio Bassi; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Thilo Hackert; Aoi Hayasaki; Matthew H G Katz; Sun-Whe Kim; Masashi Kishiwada; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Christoph W Michalski; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.996

8.  Postoperative complications and overall survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Amudhan Pugalenthi; Mladjan Protic; Mithat Gonen; T Peter Kingham; Michael I D' Angelica; Ronald P Dematteo; Yuman Fong; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ryan P Merkow; Karl Y Bilimoria; James S Tomlinson; Jennifer L Paruch; Jason B Fleming; Mark S Talamonti; Clifford Y Ko; David J Bentrem
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: What is the best protocol?

Authors:  Fuyuhiko Motoi; Michiaki Unno
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-02-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Prognostic and predictive value of CA 19-9 in locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with multiagent induction chemotherapy: results from a prospective, multicenter phase II trial (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113).

Authors:  I Hartlapp; D Valta-Seufzer; J T Siveke; H Algül; E Goekkurt; G Siegler; U M Martens; D Waldschmidt; U Pelzer; M Fuchs; F Kullmann; S Boeck; T J Ettrich; S Held; R Keller; F Anger; C T Germer; A Stang; B Kimmel; V Heinemann; V Kunzmann
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2022-08-12

Review 2.  Role of imaging in evaluating the response after neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Zi-Xing Huang; Bin Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.