Literature DB >> 28195303

Staging of pancreatic cancer based on the number of positive lymph nodes.

I Tarantino1, R Warschkow2,3, T Hackert1, B M Schmied3, M W Büchler1, O Strobel1, A Ulrich1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery has stated that at least 12 lymph nodes should be evaluated for staging of pancreatic cancer. The aim of this population-based study was to evaluate whether the number of positive lymph nodes refines staging.
METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreatectomy for stage I-II pancreatic cancer between 2004 and 2012 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The predictive value of the number of positive lymph nodes for survival was assessed by generalized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and propensity score-adjusted Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: Some 5036 patients were included, with a median of 18 (i.q.r. 15-24) lymph nodes examined. Positive lymph nodes were found in 3555 patients (70·6 per cent). The median duration of follow-up was 15 (i.q.r. 8-28) months. ROC curve analysis revealed that two positive lymph nodes best discriminated overall survival. Patients with one or two positive lymph nodes (pN1a) and those with three or more positive lymph nodes (pN1b) had an increased risk of overall mortality compared with patients who were node-negative (pN0): hazard ratio (HR) 1·47 (95 per cent c.i. 1·33 to 1·64) and HR 2·01 (1·82 to 2·22) respectively. These findings were confirmed by propensity score-adjusted Cox regression analysis. The 5-year overall survival rates were 39·8 (95 per cent c.i. 36·5 to 43·3) per cent for patients with pN0, 21·0 (18·6 to 23·6) per cent for those with pN1a and 11·4 (9·9 to 13·3) per cent for patients with pN1b disease.
CONCLUSION: The number of positive lymph nodes in the resection specimen is a prognostic factor in patients with pancreatic cancer.
© 2017 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28195303     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

1.  Multi-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves response and survival in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Paige Blinn; Ravi Shridhar; Taylor Maramara; Jamie Huston; Kenneth Meredith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-10

2.  Prognostic Nomogram for Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A TRIPOD-Compliant Retrospective Long-Term Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Kai Zhang; Mingna Li; J P Neoptolemos; Junli Wu; Wentao Gao; Pengfei Wu; Baobao Cai; Jie Yin; Guodong Shi; Zipeng Lu; Kuirong Jiang; Yi Miao
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  What do surgeons need to know about the mesopancreas.

Authors:  Eduardo de Souza M Fernandes; Oliver Strobel; Camila Girão; Jose Maria A Moraes-Junior; Orlando Jorge M Torres
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Helicobacter pylori infection, atrophic gastritis, and pancreatic cancer risk: A meta-analysis of prospective epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Yue-Tong Chen; Rui Wang; Xin-Zu Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  A Refined Staging Model for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Incorporating Examined Lymph Nodes, Location of Tumor and Positive Lymph Nodes Ratio.

Authors:  Yunda Song; Zhenxin Chen; Luohai Chen; Chaobin He; Xin Huang; Fangting Duan; Jun Wang; Xiangming Lao; Shengping Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Adjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation is associated with improved survival for resected stage I-II pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Sung Jun Ma; Gregory M Hermann; Kavitha M Prezzano; Lucas M Serra; Austin J Iovoli; Anurag K Singh
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 7.  Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Oliver Strobel; John Neoptolemos; Dirk Jäger; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Validation of the prognostic value of various lymph node staging systems for cervical squamous cell carcinoma following radical surgery: a single-center analysis of 3,732 patients.

Authors:  Qinhao Guo; Jun Zhu; Yong Wu; Hao Wen; Lingfang Xia; Xingzhu Ju; Guihao Ke; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04

9.  Tumor size classification of the 8th edition of TNM staging system is superior to that of the 7th edition in predicting the survival outcome of pancreatic cancer patients after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Lin Cong; Qiaofei Liu; Ronghua Zhang; Ming Cui; Xiang Zhang; Xiang Gao; Junchao Guo; Menghua Dai; Taiping Zhang; Quan Liao; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  [Surgery for periampullary pancreatic cancer].

Authors:  Thomas Hank; Ulla Klaiber; Klaus Sahora; Martin Schindl; Oliver Strobel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.