L Blanchet1, A Smolinska, A Baranska, E Tigchelaar, M Swertz, A Zhernakova, J W Dallinga, C Wijmenga, F J van Schooten. 1. Top Institute Food and Nutrition (TIFN), Wageningen, The Netherlands. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Thayer school of engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thousands of endogenous and exogenous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are excreted in each breath. Inflammatory and deviant metabolic processes affect the level of endogeneous VOCs, which can serve as specific biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and disease monitoring. Important issues that still need to be tackled are related to potential confounding factors like gender and age and endogenous and exogenous factors, like f.i. smoking. METHODS: The aim of this study was to systematically access the effect of endogenous and exogenous factors on VOC composition of exhaled breath. In the current study breath samples from 1417 adult participants from the LifeLines cohort, a general population cohort in the Netherlands, were collected and the total content of VOCs was measured using gas chromatography-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry. Breath samples were collected in Groningen and transferred to carbon tubes immediately. These samples were then shipped to Maastricht and measured in batches. VOCs profiles were correlated to 14 relevant characteristics of all participants including age, BMI, smoking and blood cell counts and metabolic parameters as well as to 16 classes of medications. RESULTS: VOCs profiles were shown to be significantly influenced by smoking behavior and to a lesser extent by age, BMI and gender. These factors need to be controlled for in breath analysis studies. We found no evidence whatsoever in this 1417 subjects' cohort that white blood cell counts, cholesterol or triglycerides levels have an influence on the VOC profile. Thus they may not have to be controlled for in exhaled breath studies. CONCLUSION: The large cohort of volunteers used here represents a unique opportunity to gauge the factors influencing VOCs profiles in a general population i.e. the most clinically relevant population. Classical clinical parameters and smoking habits clearly influence breath content and should therefore be accounted for in future clinical studies involving breath analysis.
BACKGROUND: Thousands of endogenous and exogenous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are excreted in each breath. Inflammatory and deviant metabolic processes affect the level of endogeneous VOCs, which can serve as specific biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and disease monitoring. Important issues that still need to be tackled are related to potential confounding factors like gender and age and endogenous and exogenous factors, like f.i. smoking. METHODS: The aim of this study was to systematically access the effect of endogenous and exogenous factors on VOC composition of exhaled breath. In the current study breath samples from 1417 adult participants from the LifeLines cohort, a general population cohort in the Netherlands, were collected and the total content of VOCs was measured using gas chromatography-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry. Breath samples were collected in Groningen and transferred to carbon tubes immediately. These samples were then shipped to Maastricht and measured in batches. VOCs profiles were correlated to 14 relevant characteristics of all participants including age, BMI, smoking and blood cell counts and metabolic parameters as well as to 16 classes of medications. RESULTS: VOCs profiles were shown to be significantly influenced by smoking behavior and to a lesser extent by age, BMI and gender. These factors need to be controlled for in breath analysis studies. We found no evidence whatsoever in this 1417 subjects' cohort that white blood cell counts, cholesterol or triglycerides levels have an influence on the VOC profile. Thus they may not have to be controlled for in exhaled breath studies. CONCLUSION: The large cohort of volunteers used here represents a unique opportunity to gauge the factors influencing VOCs profiles in a general population i.e. the most clinically relevant population. Classical clinical parameters and smoking habits clearly influence breath content and should therefore be accounted for in future clinical studies involving breath analysis.
Authors: Bradley S Chew; Raquel Pimentel Contreras; Mitchell M McCartney; Eva Borras; Nicholas J Kenyon; Cristina E Davis Journal: J Breath Res Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Max H M C Scheepers; Zaid Al-Difaie; Lloyd Brandts; Andrea Peeters; Bart van Grinsven; Nicole D Bouvy Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-06-01
Authors: Marco Beccaria; Carly Bobak; Boitumelo Maitshotlo; Theodore R Mellors; Giorgia Purcaro; Flavio A Franchina; Christiaan A Rees; Mavra Nasir; Wendy S Stevens; Lesley E Scott; Andrew Black; Jane E Hill Journal: J Breath Res Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 3.262
Authors: Rosa A Sola Martínez; José M Pastor Hernández; Óscar Yanes Torrado; Manuel Cánovas Díaz; Teresa de Diego Puente; María Vinaixa Crevillent Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 3.756