Literature DB >> 32919172

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening in Taiwan.

Huei-Yi Tsai1, Yu-Ling Chang2, Cheng-Ting Shen3, Wei-Shiuan Chung4, Hui-Ju Tsai3, Fang-Ming Chen5.   

Abstract

The breast cancer screening program has continued in Taiwan during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our nationwide data showed that the total number of screenings decreased by 22.2%, which was more pronounced for in-hospital examinations (-37.2%), while outreach showed a 12.9% decrease. This decline in screening participation happened at all levels of hospitals, more significantly at the highest level. Our report revealed that outreach services could maintain relatively stable breast cancer screening under this kind of public health crisis. Building a flexible, outreach system into the community might need to be considered when policymakers are preparing for future possible pandemics.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer screening; COVID-19; Mammography; Outreach

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32919172      PMCID: PMC7470863          DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


Introduction

Regular breast cancer screening can reduce breast cancer deaths by 60% within 10 years after diagnosis [1]. Many countries have implemented breast cancer screening programs for decades; however, since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) [2], routine screening has been postponed in many areas for prevention of spread of infection or for preservation of healthcare capacity [3,4]. The Health Promotion Administration of Taiwan decided to continue the cancer screening program because the COVID-19 infection has been relatively well-controlled in Taiwan [5,6]. For safe mammography examination, recommendations such as screening the participants for COVID-19 by symptoms and TOCC histories (travel, occupation, contact, and cluster), keeping social distance between participants, using personal protective equipment, and cleaning and disinfecting the examination room and mammography equipment were followed, and up to June 28, no COVID-19 infection had occurred in Taiwan due to mammography examination. For promotion of in-hospital breast cancer screening in Taiwan, hospitals use posters, in-hospital broadcast, and out-patient department referral. District public health centers arrange outreach screening sessions and telephone eligible women in their district to encourage enrolment. During the pandemic, hospitals have been free to make their own screening policies, while district public health centers have decided on whether outreach sessions are held as scheduled or postponed, and eligible women are free to choose when and where to receive regular screening. The aim of this report is to present our experience of breast cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic using nationwide data.

Materials and methods

The breast cancer screening program

The Taiwan government started a nation-wide breast cancer screening program in 1999. Women aged 45–69 years are encouraged to have a government-subsidized mammography every two years, and women aged 40–44 years with second-degree relatives ever diagnosed with breast cancer are also included. and Welfare has provided special funding to increase screening capacity since 2010, and this funding has encouraged hospitals to promote in-hospital screening and provide hospital-based outreach using mobile mammography units. A mobile mammography unit includes mammography equipment in a van and certificated radiographers who work together with physicians, nurses, and administration staff to provide community-based adult health examinations as well as cancer screening. According to the Health Promotion Administration Annual Report 2019 [7], the latest reported number of breast cancer screenings is 860,000 in 2018 and the screening rate is 39.9%.

Screening data

A national screening database is available for data mining and here we report the numbers of screenings and recall rates for January–April 2020, compared to those of the same period in 2019. There are four levels in the hierarchy of hospitals in Taiwan, being medical centers, regional hospitals, local hospitals, and clinics. Data has been stratified by the level of hospitals as well as by location where the mammography was carried out (in-hospital or outreach) and age of participants.

Statistics

The two-sample test for proportion was used to examine the differences of screening rates and recall rates in the two years selected for study, while the chi-square test was used to examine the relationship between the variables with stratified data and the screenings, with p < .05 being defined as statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 shows the overall conditions in 2019 and 2020, where the total number of screenings decreased by 22.2%. The decline was more pronounced for in-hospital examinations (37.2%, p < .001), where the proportion of in-hospital screenings decreased from 38.2% to 30.8%. The recall rates increased in 2020, both in the in-hospital and outreach groups (p < .001).
Table 1

Comparison of the number of screening mammograms and recall rates in the same period of 2019 and 2020.

2019 (Jan.–Apr.)
2020 (Jan.–Apr.)
Differencep-value
NumbersProportioncNumbersProportionc
Number of screeningsTotal396,371100%308,463100%−87,908 (−22.2%)<0.001a
In-hospital151,34338.2%95,08230.8%−56,261 (−37.2%)<0.001a
Outreach245,02861.8%213,38169.2%−31,647 (−12.9%)<0.001a
Recall rateIn-hospital8.3%8.7%0.4%<0.001b
Outreach6.6%6.9%0.3%<0.001b

Two-sample test for proportion to examine the screening rate differences. We used the screening rate of 39.9% in 2018 to estimate the number of eligible women and presumed they are the same in 2019 and 2020. The calculation was made by using approximate values.

Two-sample test for proportion to examine the recall rate differences.

The proportion of in-hospital screenings decreased and the proportion of outreach increased in 2020. The difference was examined using Chi-square test and showed significant difference (p < .001).

Comparison of the number of screening mammograms and recall rates in the same period of 2019 and 2020. Two-sample test for proportion to examine the screening rate differences. We used the screening rate of 39.9% in 2018 to estimate the number of eligible women and presumed they are the same in 2019 and 2020. The calculation was made by using approximate values. Two-sample test for proportion to examine the recall rate differences. The proportion of in-hospital screenings decreased and the proportion of outreach increased in 2020. The difference was examined using Chi-square test and showed significant difference (p < .001). Data stratification by hierarchy of hospitals is presented in Fig. 1. The medical centers provided more screenings than other hospitals in both 2019 and 2020. During the pandemic, the number of screenings decreased more in medical centers. Fig. 2 shows the data stratification by age, and decrease of screening number and increase of outreach proportion occurred across nearly all age groups, with statistical examination showing that the difference of screenings in the two years were associated with age and the hierarchy of hospitals (p < .001).
Fig. 1

Screening data stratification by the hierarchy of hospitals. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of screenings decreased in all the four levels of hospitals, more pronounced in medical centers. The lines show the proportion of outreach service increased in 2020 in the first three levels of hospitals.

Fig. 2

Screening data stratification by age of the participants. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of screening mammographies decreased in all age levels and the proportion of outreach services increased.

Screening data stratification by the hierarchy of hospitals. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of screenings decreased in all the four levels of hospitals, more pronounced in medical centers. The lines show the proportion of outreach service increased in 2020 in the first three levels of hospitals. Screening data stratification by age of the participants. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of screening mammographies decreased in all age levels and the proportion of outreach services increased.

Discussion

Results for the nation-wide breast cancer screening program during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan showed significant decrease in in-hospital screening while outreach with mobile mammography units maintained relatively stable services. There are several possible explanations for the in-hospital examination decrease. Firstly, restriction on hospital visits [8,9] and triage of patients with COVID-19 infection risks to outdoor visiting areas both limited the number of people entering hospitals. Secondly, people hesitated to go to hospitals during the pandemic. Thirdly, the hospitals did not promote cancer screening as actively as they did before the outbreak. Accessibility is one of the important factors associated with breast cancer screening participation [[10], [11], [12]]. Outreach programs increase accessibility for community residents to receive a mammography. The data showed that with proper measures, community screening remained a safe and reliable way to maintain regular breast examinations during the pandemic. The effect of COVID-19 on breast cancer screening was observed across all levels of hospitals and was more pronounced for medical centers. Because hospitals followed the direction of the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC), they tended to have similar policies to prevent spread of infection; however, the medical centers might have stricter policies leading to higher degree of screening rate decline. Age is one of the influencing factors for women participating in breast cancer screening [13] or adhering to guidelines for screening mammography [14], and the data showed a similar degree of reduced screening participation across nearly all age groups. Although statistical significance is present, it might be due to the very large sample size in the study [15]. Healthcare practices have changed since the COVID-19 pandemic struck. Our report confirms that outreach services can maintain relatively stable breast cancer screening rates under this kind of public health crisis. In contrast to restriction of healthcare and cancer screening in the hospitals, building a flexible, outreach system into the community might need to be considered when policymakers are preparing for possible future pandemics.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required for this study.

Declaration of competing interest

None.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Has COVID-19 Affected Cancer Screening Programs? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ibrahim Alkatout; Matthias Biebl; Zohre Momenimovahed; Edward Giovannucci; Fatemeh Hadavandsiri; Hamid Salehiniya; Leila Allahqoli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Women's Health in Brazil.

Authors:  Lander Dos Santos; Kely Paviani Stevanato; Igor Roszkowski; Raíssa Bocchi Pedroso; Fernando Castilho Pelloso; Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas; Maria Dalva de Barros Carvalho; Sandra Marisa Pelloso
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-11-18

3.  The delay of breast cancer diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Bruna Mayumi Takaki Tachibana; Renato Leme de Moura Ribeiro; Érica Elisangela Françolin Federicci; Renata Feres; Felipe Antonio Sulla Lupinacci; Iviny Yonekura; Ana Claudia Silveira Racy
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-12-20

4.  Breast Biopsy Recommendations and Breast Cancers Diagnosed during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Kathryn P Lowry; Michael C S Bissell; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Nila Alsheik; Tere Macarol; Erin J A Bowles; Diana S M Buist; Anna N A Tosteson; Louise Henderson; Sally D Herschorn; Karen J Wernli; Donald L Weaver; Natasha K Stout; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 29.146

5.  A Cohort Study on the Immunogenicity and Safety of the Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (BBIBP-CorV) in Patients With Breast Cancer; Does Trastuzumab Interfere With the Outcome?

Authors:  Maryam Joudi; Maryam Moradi Binabaj; Pejman Porouhan; Babak PeyroShabany; Mohsen Tabasi; Danial Fazilat-Panah; Mahtab Khajeh; Arezoo Mehrabian; Mansoureh Dehghani; James S Welsh; Batol Keykhosravi; Azam Akbari Yazdi; Mona Ariamanesh; Ahmad Ghasemi; Gordon Ferns; Seyed Alireza Javadinia
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 6.  Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on radiology education, training, and practice: A narrative review.

Authors:  Md Anwarul Azim Majumder; Uma Gaur; Keerti Singh; Latha Kandamaran; Subir Gupta; Mainul Haque; Sayeeda Rahman; Bidyadhar Sa; Mizanur Rahman; Fidel Rampersad
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-28

Review 7.  Reduced Cancer Screening Due to Lockdowns of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reviewing Impacts and Ways to Counteract the Impacts.

Authors:  Tuan Luu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Patient-Reported Experiences of Breast Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Delay, and Telemedicine Adoption during COVID-19.

Authors:  Simo Du; Laura Carfang; Emily Restrepo; Christine Benjamin; Mara M Epstein; Ricki Fairley; Laura Roudebush; Crystal Hertz; Leah Eshraghi; Erica T Warner
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 9.  Imaging in the COVID-19 era: Lessons learned during a pandemic.

Authors:  Georgios Antonios Sideris; Melina Nikolakea; Aikaterini-Eleftheria Karanikola; Sofia Konstantinopoulou; Dimitrios Giannis; Lucy Modahl
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-28

Review 10.  COVID-19 pandemic revisited: lessons the radiology community has learned a year later.

Authors:  Soheil Kooraki; Melina Hosseiny; Erik M Velez; Amit Gupta; Robert Gilkeson; Steven S Raman; Ali Gholamrezanezhad
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.