Literature DB >> 32917629

Intrasession repeatability and intersession reproducibility of peripapillary OCTA vessel parameters in non-glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes.

Jae Chang Lee1, Dominic J Grisafe1, Bruce Burkemper1, Brenda R Chang1, Xiao Zhou2, Zhongdi Chu2, Ali Fard3, Mary Durbin3, Brandon J Wong1, Brian J Song1, Benjamin Y Xu1, Ruikang Wang2, Grace M Richter4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare intrasession repeatability versus intersession reproducibility of the peripapillary vessel parameters using optical microangiography-based optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in non-glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes.
METHODS: In an observational, longitudinal study, peripapillary OCTA scans were collected to evaluate intrasession repeatability and intersession reproducibility using within-eye coefficient of variation (CVW) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Images were quantified using a custom research-oriented quantification software calculating vessel area density (VAD) and flux and a commercially developed, clinic-oriented quantification software (Cirrus 11.0, Carl Zeiss Meditec) calculating perfusion density (PD) and flux index (FI). Effect of signal strength on the reliability of OCTA parameters was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Among 120 non-glaucomatous eyes, intrasession CVW were 4.2% for VAD, 5.3% for flux, 1.5% for PD and 2.0% for FI. The intersession CVW were 6.5% for VAD, 8.0% for flux, 2.0% for PD and 3.2% for FI. The intrasession ICC ranged from 0.928 to 0.945, and intersession ICC ranged from 0.811 to 0.866. From 118 glaucomatous eyes, intrasession CVW was 9.0% for VAD, 10.3% for flux, 1.7% for PD and 2.3% for FI. The intersession CVW was 12.1% for VAD, 14.2% for flux, 2.3% for PD and 3.5% for FI. The intrasession ICC ranged from 0.904 to 0.972, and intersession ICC ranged from 0.855 to 0.955. Signal strength was significantly positively associated with OCTA vessel parameters (p<0.0001) for both groups.
CONCLUSION: Peripapillary OCTA vessel parameters had greater intrasession repeatability compared to intersession reproducibility in both non-glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes. The built-in commercially developed quantification software demonstrated greater agreement than the custom research-oriented quantification software. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glaucoma; Imaging; Optic Nerve

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32917629      PMCID: PMC7947035          DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  38 in total

1.  Determinants of Peripapillary and Macular Vessel Densities Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Normal Eyes.

Authors:  Harsha L Rao; Zia S Pradhan; Robert N Weinreb; Hemanth B Reddy; Mohammed Riyazuddin; Sonia Sachdeva; Narendra K Puttaiah; Chaitra Jayadev; Carroll A B Webers
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Measurement error proportional to the mean.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-13

3.  Progressive Macula Vessel Density Loss in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Takuhei Shoji; Linda M Zangwill; Tadamichi Akagi; Luke J Saunders; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Patricia Isabel C Manalastas; Rafaella C Penteado; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Evaluation of Macular Perfusion in Healthy Smokers by Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Ziya Ayhan; Mahmut Kaya; Taylan Ozturk; Omer Karti; F Hakan Oner
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.300

5.  SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF EXERCISE ON OPTIC NERVE AND MACULAR PERFUSION MEASURED BY OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY.

Authors:  Maged Alnawaiseh; Larissa Lahme; Maximilian Treder; André Rosentreter; Nicole Eter
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Long-term reproducibility of cirrus HD optical coherence tomography deviation map in clinically stable glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Kyu Hwa Roh; Jin Wook Jeoung; Ki Ho Park; Beong Wook Yoo; Dong Myung Kim
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Microvascular Density in Glaucomatous Eyes With Hemifield Visual Field Defects: An Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study.

Authors:  Tadamichi Akagi; Yuto Iida; Hideo Nakanishi; Noriko Terada; Satoshi Morooka; Hiroshi Yamada; Tomoko Hasegawa; Satoshi Yokota; Munemitsu Yoshikawa; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Diagnostic Performance of Macular Versus Peripapillary Vessel Parameters by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Glaucoma.

Authors:  Grace M Richter; Ryuna Chang; Betty Situ; Zhongdi Chu; Bruce Burkemper; Alena Reznik; Sahar Bedrood; Amir H Kashani; Rohit Varma; Ruikang K Wang
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Staging glaucoma patient: why and how?

Authors:  Remo Susanna; Roberto M Vessani
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2009-09-17

10.  Quantitative OCT angiography of optic nerve head blood flow.

Authors:  Yali Jia; John C Morrison; Jason Tokayer; Ou Tan; Lorinna Lombardi; Bernhard Baumann; Chen D Lu; Woojhon Choi; James G Fujimoto; David Huang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  6 in total

1.  Long-term reproducibility of optical coherence tomography angiography in healthy and stable glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Takashi Nishida; Sasan Moghimi; Huiyuan Hou; James A Proudfoot; Aimee C Chang; Ryan Caezar C David; Alireza Kamalipour; Nevin El-Nimri; Jasmin Rezapour; Christopher Bowd; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.908

2.  Steps to Measurement Floor of an Optical Microangiography Device in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Mark J Phillips; Duyen Dinh-Dang; Kyle Bolo; Bruce Burkemper; Jae C Lee; Vivian H LeTran; Brenda R Chang; Dominic J Grisafe; Zhongdi Chu; Xiao Zhou; Brian J Song; Benjamin Y Xu; Brandon Wong; Ruikang K Wang; Grace M Richter
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Long-term repeatability of peripapillary optical coherence tomography angiography measurements in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Woo Hyuk Lee; Min-Woo Lee; Min-Su Kim; Cheon Kuk Ryu; Jung-Yeul Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Reference database of total retinal vessel surface area derived from volume-rendered optical coherence tomography angiography.

Authors:  Peter M Maloca; Silvia Feu-Basilio; Julia Schottenhamml; Philippe Valmaggia; Hendrik P N Scholl; Josep Rosinés-Fonoll; Sara Marin-Martinez; Nadja Inglin; Michael Reich; Clemens Lange; Catherine Egan; Sandrine Zweifel; Adnan Tufail; Richard F Spaide; Javier Zarranz-Ventura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Evaluation of macular and peripapillary vascular parameter change in healthy subjects after caffeine intake using optical coherence tomography angiography.

Authors:  Busra Yilmaz Tugan; Sevgi Subasi; Dilara Pirhan; Levent Karabas; Nursen Yuksel; Kubra Demirci Kucuk
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  All retinas are not created equal: Fovea-to-macula thickness ratio and foveal microvasculature in healthy young children.

Authors:  Pelsin Demir; Nathaniel Hovsepian; Peter Pagels; Vanja Petersson; Karthikeyan Baskaran; Antonio Filipe Macedo
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.992

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.