| Literature DB >> 32917033 |
Qilin Wu1, Qinlong Jing2, Xiujuan Wang3, Lili Yang4, Yilan Li2, Zongqiu Chen2, Mengmeng Ma2, Zhicong Yang1,2,3.
Abstract
Guangzhou is believed to be the most important epicenter of dengue outbreaks in southern China. In this study, a longitudinal serological investigation of previous cases of dengue fever in Guangzhou was conducted to explore the persistence of IgG antibodies and related factors affecting the changes of antibody level. We recruited 70 dengue virus type 1 (DENV-1) primary infection cases at two years post infection for serological investigation and conducted a second follow-up in the 5th year of prognosis. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for DENV IgG antibody was examined in all study subjects. Potential factors associated with the concentration of serum total IgG antibody were determined by the generalized estimation equation (GEE). No significant difference in serum total IgG antibody positive rate between two follow-ups was observed (χ2 = 3.066, p = 0.080). However, there was a significant difference in the concentration of serum total IgG antibody between the two follow-ups (Z = 7.154, p < 0.001). The GEE showed that the antibody level in the five-year prognosis was mainly affected by the antibody level in the two-year prognosis (OR: 1.007, 95%CI: 1.005-1.009). In conclusion, the serum IgG antibodies of previous dengue fever cases can persist for a long time.Entities:
Keywords: antibody; dengue fever; kinetics; longitudinal investigation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32917033 PMCID: PMC7557381 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186580
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Demographic information of the study subjects.
| Factor | Number | Account (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 29 | 41.43 |
| Female | 41 | 58.57 | |
| Age in years | <60 years | 58 | 82.86 |
| ≥60 years | 12 | 17.14 | |
| Education | Junior high school and below | 24 | 34.29 |
| High school/technical secondary school | 23 | 32.86 | |
| College and above | 23 | 32.86 | |
| Occupation | Worker | 11 | 15.71 |
| Professional technology/cadre/clerk | 13 | 18.57 | |
| Business/Service staff | 15 | 21.43 | |
| Other | 31 | 44.29 | |
| Annual household income | Less than 30,000 | 14 | 20.00 |
| 30,000–60,000 | 20 | 28.57 | |
| 60,000–100,000 | 26 | 37.14 | |
| More than 100,000 | 10 | 14.29 |
Comparison of IgG antibody positive rate in different populations at each follow-up visit.
| Variables | Total Number | First Follow-Up |
|
| Second Follow-Up |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive Number | Positive Rate (%) | Positive Number | Positive Rate (%) | ||||||
| Age in years | NA | NA | 0.578 | 0.447 | |||||
| <60 | 58 | 58 | 100.00 | 56 | 96.55 | ||||
| ≥60 | 12 | 12 | 100.00 | 11 | 91.67 | ||||
| Gender | NA | NA | 4.431 | 0.035 * | |||||
| Male | 29 | 29 | 100.00 | 26 | 89.66 | ||||
| Female | 41 | 41 | 100.00 | 41 | 100.00 | ||||
* Significance difference where p-value is less than 0.05.
Comparison of IgG antibody concentrations in different populations at each follow-up visit.
| Variables | First Follow-Up |
|
| Second Follow-Up |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Value | Standard Deviation | Average Value | Standard Deviation | |||||
| Age in years | 2.824 | 0.097 | 2.800 | 0.099 | ||||
| <60 | 161.23 | 31.69 | 118.62 | 44.64 | ||||
| ≥60 | 182.52 | 25.20 | 126.48 | 61.58 | ||||
| Gender | 0.373 | 0.543 | 11.603 | 0.001 * | ||||
| Male | 162.39 | 33.84 | 114.15 | 61.09 | ||||
| Female | 166.65 | 30.15 | 124.08 | 35.37 | ||||
* Significance difference where p-value is less than 0.05.
Comparison of total IgG antibody positive rate and concentration between two follow-up visits.
| Follow-Up | Total IgG Antibody Positive Rate (%) |
|
| Total IgG Antibody Concentration |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | 100.00 | 3.066 | 0.080 | 164.89 ± 31.56 | 7.154 | <0.001 * |
| Second | 95.71 | 119.97 ± 47.54 |
* Significance difference where p-value is less than 0.05.
Analysis of univariate influencing factors of IgG antibody level at five years of prognosis.
| Factor |
|
|
|
| OR (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years | |||||
| <60 | 1.0 | ||||
| ≥60 | −0.114 | 0.110 | 1.077 | 0.299 | 0.892 (0.719, 1.107) |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 1.0 | ||||
| Female | 0.032 | 0.083 | 0.147 | 0.702 | 1.032 (0.877, 1.215) |
| Basic medical history | |||||
| No | 1.0 | ||||
| Yes | 0.218 | 0.076 | 8.126 | 0.004 * | 1.243 (1.070, 1.444) |
| Vaccination | |||||
| No | 1.0 | ||||
| Yes | 0.146 | 0.127 | 1.321 | 0.250 | 1.158 (0.902, 1.485) |
| First follow-up antibody concentration | 0.007 | 0.001 | 48.100 | <0.001 * | 1.008 (1.005, 1.010) |
* Significance difference where p-value is less than 0.05. 95% confidence interval.
Analysis of univariate influencing factors of IgG antibody level at five years of prognosis.
| Factor |
|
|
|
| OR (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic medical history | |||||
| No | 1.0 | ||||
| Yes | 0.107 | 0.065 | 2.715 | 0.099 | 1.113 (0.980, 1.265) |
| First follow-up antibody concentration | 0.007 | 0.001 | 40.089 | <0.001 * | 1.007 (1.005, 1.009) |
* Significance difference where p-value is less than 0.05. 95% confidence interval.