Literature DB >> 32916032

The shifting shape and functional specializations of the cell cycle during lineage development.

Yung Hwang1, Daniel Hidalgo1, Merav Socolovsky1.   

Abstract

Essentially all cell cycling in multicellular organisms in vivo takes place in the context of lineage differentiation. This notwithstanding, the regulation of the cell cycle is often assumed to be generic, independent of tissue or developmental stage. Here we review developmental-stage-specific cell cycle adaptations that may influence developmental decisions, in mammalian erythropoiesis and in other lineages. The length of the cell cycle influences the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in multiple tissues, and may determine lineage fate. Shorter cycles contribute to the efficiency of reprogramming somatic cells into induced pluripotency stem cells and help maintain the pluripotent state. While the plasticity of G1 length is well established, the speed of S phase is emerging as a novel regulated parameter that may influence cell fate transitions in the erythroid lineage, in neural tissue and in embryonic stem cells. A slow S phase may stabilize the self-renewal state, whereas S phase shortening may favor a cell fate change. In the erythroid lineage, functional approaches and single-cell RNA-sequencing show that a key transcriptional switch, at the transition from self-renewal to differentiation, is synchronized with and dependent on S phase. This specific S phase is shorter, as a result of a genome-wide increase in the speed of replication forks. Furthermore, there is progressive shortening in G1 in the period preceding this switch. Together these studies suggest an integrated regulatory landscape of the cycle and differentiation programs, where cell cycle adaptations are controlled by, and in turn feed back on, the propagation of developmental trajectories. This article is categorized under: Congenital Diseases > Stem Cells and Development.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  erythropoiesis, cell cycle; hematopoiesis; single-cell RNA-sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32916032      PMCID: PMC9004340          DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  WIREs Mech Dis        ISSN: 2692-9368


  89 in total

1.  Sensillum development in the absence of cell division: the sensillum phenotype of the Drosophila mutant string.

Authors:  V Hartenstein; J W Posakony
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 2.  Nucleosome destabilization in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression.

Authors:  Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  High speed of fork progression induces DNA replication stress and genomic instability.

Authors:  Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Pavel Moudry; Joanna Maria Merchut-Maya; MyungHee Lee; Robert Strauss; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Inhibition of Cell Division and DNA Replication Impair Mouse-Naïve Pluripotency Exit.

Authors:  Ariel Waisman; Camila Vazquez Echegaray; Claudia Solari; María Soledad Cosentino; Iain Martyn; Alessia Deglincerti; Mohammad Zeeshan Ozair; Albert Ruzo; Lino Barañao; Santiago Miriuka; Ali Brivanlou; Alejandra Guberman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Human embryonic stem cells are pre-mitotically committed to self-renewal and acquire a lengthened G1 phase upon lineage programming.

Authors:  Klaus A Becker; Janet L Stein; Jane B Lian; Andre J van Wijnen; Gary S Stein
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.384

6.  Overexpression of cdk4 and cyclinD1 triggers greater expansion of neural stem cells in the adult mouse brain.

Authors:  Benedetta Artegiani; Dirk Lindemann; Federico Calegari
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  Rapid DNA replication origin licensing protects stem cell pluripotency.

Authors:  Jacob Peter Matson; Raluca Dumitru; Philip Coryell; Ryan M Baxley; Weili Chen; Kirk Twaroski; Beau R Webber; Jakub Tolar; Anja-Katrin Bielinsky; Jeremy E Purvis; Jeanette Gowen Cook
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Cell cycle dynamics in the reprogramming of cellular identity.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Anna E Eastman; Shangqin Guo
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  Cell proliferation in the gastrulating chick embryo: a study using BrdU incorporation and PCNA localization.

Authors:  E J Sanders; M Varedi; A S French
Journal:  Development       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Dynamics of the 4D genome during in vivo lineage specification and differentiation.

Authors:  A Marieke Oudelaar; Robert A Beagrie; Matthew Gosden; Sara de Ornellas; Emily Georgiades; Jon Kerry; Daniel Hidalgo; Joana Carrelha; Arun Shivalingam; Afaf H El-Sagheer; Jelena M Telenius; Tom Brown; Veronica J Buckle; Merav Socolovsky; Douglas R Higgs; Jim R Hughes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The role of specialized cell cycles during erythroid lineage development: insights from single-cell RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Merav Socolovsky
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.319

Review 2.  S Phase Duration Is Determined by Local Rate and Global Organization of Replication.

Authors:  Avraham Greenberg; Itamar Simon
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07

3.  Integrative proteomics reveals principles of dynamic phosphosignaling networks in human erythropoiesis.

Authors:  Özge Karayel; Peng Xu; Isabell Bludau; Senthil Velan Bhoopalan; Yu Yao; Freitas Colaco Ana Rita; Alberto Santos; Brenda A Schulman; Arno F Alpi; Mitchell J Weiss; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 11.429

4.  EpoR stimulates rapid cycling and larger red cells during mouse and human erythropoiesis.

Authors:  Daniel Hidalgo; Jacob Bejder; Ramona Pop; Kyle Gellatly; Yung Hwang; S Maxwell Scalf; Anna E Eastman; Jane-Jane Chen; Lihua Julie Zhu; Jules A A C Heuberger; Shangqin Guo; Mark J Koury; Nikolai Baastrup Nordsborg; Merav Socolovsky
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Global early replication disrupts gene expression and chromatin conformation in a single cell cycle.

Authors:  Miguel M Santos; Mark C Johnson; Lukáš Fiedler; Philip Zegerman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 17.906

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.