| Literature DB >> 32914449 |
Eric M Libell1, Julia A Richardson1, Katie L Lutz1, Benton Y Ng1, Shelley R H Mockler2, Katie M Laubscher2, Carrie M Stephan1, Bridget M Zimmerman3, Erik R Edens4, Benjamin E Reinking1, Katherine D Mathews1,5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Reported frequencies of cardiomyopathy in limb girdle muscular dystrophy R9 (LGMDR9) vary. We describe the frequency and age at onset of cardiomyopathy in an LDMDR9 cohort.Entities:
Keywords: All neuromuscular disease; FKRP; cardiomyopathy; dystroglycanopathy; limb-girdle muscular dystrophy; muscular dystrophy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32914449 PMCID: PMC7693230 DOI: 10.1002/mus.27052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Muscle Nerve ISSN: 0148-639X Impact factor: 3.217
FIGURE 1Flowsheet diagram of subject inclusion
Participant demographics
| Genotype | Study population (%) | Male (%) | Length of follow‐up, y | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All subjects | With abnormal echo | No abnormal echo | |||||||
| Median (IQR) | n | Median (IQR) | Range | n | Median (IQR) | Range | |||
| c.826C>A, c.826C>A | 29 (52) | 12 (41) | 33.3 (27.0‐41.4) | 9 | 33.3 (31.1‐39.7) | 18.0‐54.2 | 20 | 33.1 (17.6‐43.8) | 10.6‐62.3 |
| Other | 27 (48) | 15 (56) | 15.4 (9.2‐19.8) | 16 | 17.2 (12.1‐21.5) | 3.6‐44.5 | 11 | 10.3 (7.1‐17.2) | 7.0‐48.7 |
| Total | 56 | 27 (48) | 20.6 (12.2‐36.2) | 25 | 21.3 (15.9‐33.3) | 3.6‐54.2 | 31 | 19.8 (11.6‐41.4) | 7.0‐62.3 |
Echocardiogram results
| Genotype | Number of participants | Number of echocardiograms reviewed | With abnormal echocardiogram count (%) | Age at first abnormal echocardiogram, y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (95% CI) | ||||
| c.826C>A, c.826C>A | 29 | 86 | 9 (31) | 54.2 (39.7‐54.2) |
| Other | 27 | 71 | 16 (59) | 18.1 (14.3‐18.1) |
| Total | 56 | 157 | 25 (45) | 33.3 (18.0‐54.2) |
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Significantly different between genotypes.
FIGURE 2Cumulative probability of developing cardiomyopathy over time (age, years). (A) All subjects. (B) FKRP homozygotes (c.826C>A, c.826C>A) vs. other FKRP genotypes. (C) FKRP subjects: male vs female
FIGURE 3Correlation of ejection fraction with (A) FVC (% predicted) and (B) 10MWT (m/s) in patients with FKRP mutations