PURPOSE: The clinical use of BRAF inhibitors in patients with melanoma is limited by intrinsic and acquired resistance. We asked whether next-generation sequencing of pretreatment tumors could identify coaltered genes that predict for intrinsic resistance to BRAF inhibitor therapy in patients with melanoma as a prelude to rational combination strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 66 tumors from patients with metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma collected before treatment with BRAF inhibitors. Tumors were analyzed for > 250 cancer-associated genes using a capture-based next-generation sequencing platform. Antitumor responses were correlated with clinical features and genomic profiles with the goal of identifying a molecular signature predictive of intrinsic resistance to RAF pathway inhibition. RESULTS: Among the 66 patients analyzed, 11 received a combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma. Among the 55 patients treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy, objective responses, as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), were observed in 30 patients (55%), with five (9%) achieving a complete response. We identified a significant association between alterations in PTEN that would be predicted to result in loss of function and reduced progression-free survival, overall survival, and response grade, a metric that combines tumor regression and duration of treatment response. Patients with melanoma who achieved an excellent response grade were more likely to have an elevated BRAF-mutant allele fraction. CONCLUSION: These results provide a rationale for cotargeting BRAF and the PI3K/AKT pathway in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma when tumors have concurrent loss-of-function mutations in PTEN. Future studies should explore whether gain of the mutant BRAF allele and/or loss of the wild-type allele is a predictive marker of BRAFi sensitivity.
PURPOSE: The clinical use of BRAF inhibitors in patients with melanoma is limited by intrinsic and acquired resistance. We asked whether next-generation sequencing of pretreatment tumors could identify coaltered genes that predict for intrinsic resistance to BRAF inhibitor therapy in patients with melanoma as a prelude to rational combination strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 66 tumors from patients with metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma collected before treatment with BRAF inhibitors. Tumors were analyzed for > 250 cancer-associated genes using a capture-based next-generation sequencing platform. Antitumor responses were correlated with clinical features and genomic profiles with the goal of identifying a molecular signature predictive of intrinsic resistance to RAF pathway inhibition. RESULTS: Among the 66 patients analyzed, 11 received a combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma. Among the 55 patients treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy, objective responses, as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), were observed in 30 patients (55%), with five (9%) achieving a complete response. We identified a significant association between alterations in PTEN that would be predicted to result in loss of function and reduced progression-free survival, overall survival, and response grade, a metric that combines tumor regression and duration of treatment response. Patients with melanoma who achieved an excellent response grade were more likely to have an elevated BRAF-mutant allele fraction. CONCLUSION: These results provide a rationale for cotargeting BRAF and the PI3K/AKT pathway in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma when tumors have concurrent loss-of-function mutations in PTEN. Future studies should explore whether gain of the mutant BRAF allele and/or loss of the wild-type allele is a predictive marker of BRAFi sensitivity.
Authors: Jessie Villanueva; Jeffrey R Infante; Clemens Krepler; Patricia Reyes-Uribe; Minu Samanta; Hsin-Yi Chen; Bin Li; Rolf K Swoboda; Melissa Wilson; Adina Vultur; Mizuho Fukunaba-Kalabis; Bradley Wubbenhorst; Thomas Y Chen; Qin Liu; Katrin Sproesser; Douglas J DeMarini; Tona M Gilmer; Anne-Marie Martin; Ronen Marmorstein; David C Schultz; David W Speicher; Giorgos C Karakousis; Wei Xu; Ravi K Amaravadi; Xiaowei Xu; Lynn M Schuchter; Meenhard Herlyn; Katherine L Nathanson Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Kim H T Paraiso; Yun Xiang; Vito W Rebecca; Ethan V Abel; Y Ann Chen; A Cecilia Munko; Elizabeth Wood; Inna V Fedorenko; Vernon K Sondak; Alexander R A Anderson; Antoni Ribas; Maurizia Dalla Palma; Katherine L Nathanson; John M Koomen; Jane L Messina; Keiran S M Smalley Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ramin Nazarian; Hubing Shi; Qi Wang; Xiangju Kong; Richard C Koya; Hane Lee; Zugen Chen; Mi-Kyung Lee; Narsis Attar; Hooman Sazegar; Thinle Chodon; Stanley F Nelson; Grant McArthur; Jeffrey A Sosman; Antoni Ribas; Roger S Lo Journal: Nature Date: 2010-11-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Keiran S M Smalley; Mercedes Lioni; Maurizia Dalla Palma; Min Xiao; Brijal Desai; Suzanne Egyhazi; Johan Hansson; Hong Wu; Alastair J King; Patricia Van Belle; David E Elder; Keith T Flaherty; Meenhard Herlyn; Katherine L Nathanson Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Eliezer M Van Allen; Nikhil Wagle; Antje Sucker; Daniel J Treacy; Cory M Johannessen; Eva M Goetz; Chelsea S Place; Amaro Taylor-Weiner; Steven Whittaker; Gregory V Kryukov; Eran Hodis; Mara Rosenberg; Aaron McKenna; Kristian Cibulskis; Deborah Farlow; Lisa Zimmer; Uwe Hillen; Ralf Gutzmer; Simone M Goldinger; Selma Ugurel; Helen J Gogas; Friederike Egberts; Carola Berking; Uwe Trefzer; Carmen Loquai; Benjamin Weide; Jessica C Hassel; Stacey B Gabriel; Scott L Carter; Gad Getz; Levi A Garraway; Dirk Schadendorf Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: F Xing; Y Persaud; C A Pratilas; B S Taylor; M Janakiraman; Q-B She; H Gallardo; C Liu; T Merghoub; B Hefter; I Dolgalev; A Viale; A Heguy; E De Stanchina; D Cobrinik; G Bollag; J Wolchok; A Houghton; D B Solit Journal: Oncogene Date: 2011-07-04 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Poulikos I Poulikakos; Yogindra Persaud; Manickam Janakiraman; Xiangju Kong; Charles Ng; Gatien Moriceau; Hubing Shi; Mohammad Atefi; Bjoern Titz; May Tal Gabay; Maayan Salton; Kimberly B Dahlman; Madhavi Tadi; Jennifer A Wargo; Keith T Flaherty; Mark C Kelley; Tom Misteli; Paul B Chapman; Jeffrey A Sosman; Thomas G Graeber; Antoni Ribas; Roger S Lo; Neal Rosen; David B Solit Journal: Nature Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: José Luís Manzano; Laura Layos; Cristina Bugés; María de Los Llanos Gil; Laia Vila; Eva Martínez-Balibrea; Anna Martínez-Cardús Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2016-06
Authors: Theodore Nicolaides; Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Karisa C Schreck; Andrew Morin; Guisheng Zhao; Amy N Allen; Patrick Flannery; Michael Glantz; Adam L Green; Chris Jones; Kenneth L Jones; Lindsay B Kilburn; Kellie J Nazemi; David Samuel; Bridget Sanford; David A Solomon; Jiawan Wang; Christine A Pratilas Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Katarzyna Klonowska; Joannes M Grevelink; Krinio Giannikou; Barbara A Ogorek; Zachary T Herbert; Aaron R Thorner; Thomas N Darling; Joel Moss; David J Kwiatkowski Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 19.456