| Literature DB >> 32912149 |
Qun Lu1, Ping Liu2, Jian-Hua Huo2, Yan-Ni Wang2, Ai-Qun Ma2, Zu-Yi Yuan2, Xiao-Jun Du3,4, Ling Bai2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac rupture (CR) is a fatal complication of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with its incidence markedly declined in the recent decades. However, clinical features of CR patients now and the effect of reperfusion therapy to CR remain unclear. We investigated the clinical features of CR in STEMI patients and the effect of reperfusion therapy to CR in mice.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; Cardiac rupture; Prognosis; Reperfusion; Risk factor; Sudden cardiac death
Year: 2020 PMID: 32912149 PMCID: PMC7488297 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01683-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 1Representative transthoracic echocardiographic images from patients with cardiac rupture. a 2-D image revealed discontinuity of the left ventricular (LV) wall (white arrow) and pericardial effusion (red arrow). b Color Doppler image demonstrated shunting of blood flow from the LV to the pericardium (white arrow) and presence of pericardial effusion (red arrow). c ventricular septum discontinuity (white arrow) in 2-D image. d shunting of blood from the LV to the right ventricle (RV, red arrow) in Color Doppler image; LA = left atrium; RA = right atrium
Clinical characteristics of cardiac rupture
| Case | gender | Age (y) | Location of AMI | Rupture Site | Diagnosis method | TT | PCI | surgical repair | percutaneous closure | IABP/ECMO | Outcome (death) | Onset MI to Death (Days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 64 | A | FWR | UCG | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
| 2 | M | 74 | A | FWR | UCG | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
| 3 | F | 79 | A | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | 31 |
| 4 | M | 83 | I | VSR | UCG | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | |
| 5 | M | 83 | I | FWR + VSR | UCG | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | 6 |
| 6 | M | 69 | A | VSR | UCG | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| 7 | M | 68 | A | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | 4 |
| 8 | F | 65 | A | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 1.0 |
| 9 | F | 87 | A | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 0.4 |
| 10 | F | 67 | A | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | 1.2 |
| 11 | M | 69 | I | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 0.4 |
| 12 | F | 76 | I | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | 7 |
| 13 | F | 58 | A | FWR + VSR | UCG | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 0.3 |
| 14 | M | 78 | A | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 2.3 |
| 15 | M | 75 | A | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | 13 |
| 16 | M | 46 | A | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
| 17 | F | 72 | A | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 0.2 |
| 18 | M | 59 | A | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 53 |
| 19 | M | 73 | A | VSR | UCG | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | |
| 20 | M | 76 | A | VSR | UCG | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | 3.4 |
| 21 | F | 76 | A | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | 10 |
| 22 | F | 68 | I | FWR | UCG | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | 3.4 |
| 23 | M | 63 | I | FWR | UCG | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | 6.2 |
| 24 | F | 63 | A | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | 15.5 |
| 25 | F | 66 | A | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| 26 | F | 68 | A + I | FWR + VSR | UCG | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | 10.7 |
| 27 | M | 59 | A | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | |
| 28 | F | 83 | A | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 0.4 |
| 29 | M | 49 | I | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| 30 | M | 55 | A + I | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | No | No | No | |
| 31 | M | 78 | A | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | 3.2 |
| 32 | F | 66 | A | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | 3 |
| 33 | M | 61 | A | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | 4.4 |
| 34 | M | 82 | I | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | 3 |
| 35 | M | 72 | A | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | |
| 36 | M | 53 | A | FWR | UCG | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | 0.4 |
| 37 | F | 60 | A | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | |
| 38 | F | 51 | A | VSR | UCG | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | |
| 39 | F | 73 | a | VSR | UCG | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | |
| 40 | M | 58 | a | VSR | UCG | No | No | Yes | No | No | No |
A anterior, AMI acute myocardial infarct, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, F female, L lateral, FWR free wall rupture, IABP intra-aortic balloon pumping, I inferior, M male, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, TT thrombolytic therapy, UCG Ultrasonic Cardiogram, VSR ventricular septum rupture
a no information available
Fig. 2The times from symptom onset to cardiac rupture diagnosis
Baseline clinical characteristics in 925 STEMI patients with and without CR
| Non-rupture | Rupture | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 58.5 ± 11.7 | 68.2 ± 10.1 | < 0.001 |
| Male gender (%) | 731 (82.6%) | 23 (57.5%) | 0.002 |
| Socio-economic feature (rural area) | 446 (50.4%) | 17 (42.5%) | 0.041 |
| Symptom-to-admission interval | 0.017 | ||
| < 12 h | 324 (36.6%) | 18 (45.0%) | |
| 12 ~ 24 h | 41 (4.6%) | 5 (12.5%) | |
| > 24 h | 520 (58.8%) | 8 (42.5%) | |
| Previous history | |||
| Diabetes | 127 (14.4%) | 12 (30.0%) | 0.012 |
| Hypertension | 380 (42.9%) | 26 (65.0%) | 0.008 |
| Alcohol consumption | 266 (30.1%) | 0 (0%) | < 0.001 |
| smoking | 587 (66.3) | 12 (30.0) | < 0.001 |
| Myocardial infarction | 53 (6.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.162 |
| Angina pectoris | 237 (27.0%) | 6 (15.0%) | 0.101 |
| Coronary surgery | 24 (2.7%) | 1 (2.5%) | 0.936 |
| Physical examination at admission | |||
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 123 ± 20 | 110 ± 39 | 0.001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 77 ± 13 | 72 ± 25 | 0.047 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 76 ± 14 | 83 ± 31 | 0.004 |
| Killip class | 0.002 | ||
| I | 552 (62.4%) | 11 (45.8%) | |
| II | 260 (29.4%) | 6 (15.0%) | |
| III | 43 (4.9%) | 3 (7.5%) | |
| IV | 30 (3.4%) | 4 (10.0%) | |
| MI localization | |||
| anterior | 359 (40.6%) | 26 (65%) | 0.002 |
| inferior | 389 (44%) | 8 (20%) | 0.003 |
| Infarct-related coronary artery | 0.417 | ||
| Left anterior descending artery | 429 (56.6%) | 17 (68%) | |
| Left circumflex artery | 58 (7.7%) | 2 (8%) | |
| Right coronary artery | 266 (35.1%) | 6 (24%) | |
| Left main trunk | 5 (0.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Number of stenosed vessel | 0.854 | ||
| 1 | 202 (26.6%) | 4 (21.1%) | |
| 2 | 269 (35.5%) | 7 (36.8%) | |
| 3 | 287 (37.9%) | 8 (42.1%) | |
Data are mean (SD) or n (%) unless otherwise stated. Killip class for CR patients was obtained prior to onset of rupture (n = 24 in rupture group). Among all STEMI patients, 773 patients underwent coronary angiography
Fig. 3Comparison of laboratory parameter between STEMI with or without cardiac rupture. CK-MB: creatine kinase-MB, hs-CRP: high sensitive C-reactive protein, FDP: fibrinogen degradation product, WBC: white blood cell. *P < 0.05 vs. STEMI without CR. Note: n = 11 in rupture group for peak CK-MB and peak hs-CRP
Fig. 4Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors and the incidence of cardiac rupture. CK-MB: creatine kinase-MB; hs-CRP: high sensitive C-reactive protein
Treatment characteristic in STEMI patients with or without cardiac rupture
| Non-rupture | Rupture | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspirin | 858 (97.0%) | 33 (82.5%) | 0.006 |
| P2Y12 inhibitor | 850 (96.0%) | 29 (72.5%) | < 0.001 |
| ACEI/ARB | 793 (89.6%) | 13 (32.5%) | < 0.001 |
| β-blocker | 794 (89.7%) | 15 (37.5%) | < 0.001 |
| Statins | 823 (93.0%) | 13 (32.5%) | < 0.001 |
| < 0.001 | |||
| primary PCI | 283 (32.0%) | 12 (30%) | |
| Delay PCI | 475 (53.7%) | 7 (17.5%) | |
| Non-PCI | 127 (14.3%) | 21 (52.5%) | |
Data are n (%). ACEI/ARB angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor blockers, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention
Fig. 5Survival curves of patients with cardiac rupture. a compared between in STEMI patients with and without CR. b compared between FWR group and VSR group. c compared between drug treatment only and life support, surgery and closure in CR. FWR: free wall rupture, VSR: ventricular septum rupture
Fig. 6Effect of reperfusion on the incidence of CR and infarct size in mice. a Comparison of survival in mice with permanent coronary artery occlusion (Group-1, n = 36), or reperfusion following 1-h (Group-2, n = 19) or 4-h (Group 3, n = 21) ischemia. b influence of reperfusion on infarct size in relation to ischemic duration. Note that infarct size was significantly reduced by early (i.e. 1-h ischemia) but not delayed (4-h ischemia) reperfusion. Infarct size date are mean ± SEM. The group size was 6–8. *P < 0.01 vs. non-reperfused MI or 4-h IR group