Literature DB >> 25332178

Trends in the clinical and pathological characteristics of cardiac rupture in patients with acute myocardial infarction over 35 years.

Satoshi Honda1, Yasuhide Asaumi2, Takafumi Yamane2, Toshiyuki Nagai2, Tadayoshi Miyagi2, Teruo Noguchi2, Toshihisa Anzai2, Yoichi Goto2, Masaharu Ishihara2, Kunihiro Nishimura3, Hisao Ogawa4, Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda2, Satoshi Yasuda1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is little known about whether the clinical and pathological characteristics and incidence of cardiac rupture (CR) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have changed over the years. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The incidence and clinical characteristics of CR were investigated in patients with AMI, who were divided into 3 cohorts: 1977-1989, 1990-2000, and 2001-2011. Of a total of 5699 patients, 144 were diagnosed with CR and 45 survived. Over the years, the incidence of CR decreased (1977-1989, 3.3%; 1990-2000, 2.8%; 2001-2011, 1.7%; P=0.002) in association with the widespread adoption of reperfusion therapy. The mortality rate of CR decreased (1977-1989, 90%; 1990-2000, 56%; 2001-2011, 50%; P=0.002) in association with an increase in the rate of emergent surgery. In multivariable analysis, first myocardial infarction, anterior infarct, female sex, hypertension, and age >70 years were significant risk factors for CR, whereas impact of hypertension on CR was weaker from 2001 to 2011. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) was a significant protective factor against CR. In 64 autopsy cases with CR, myocardial hemorrhage occurred more frequently in those who underwent PPCI or fibrinolysis than those who did not receive reperfusion therapy (no reperfusion therapy, 18.0%; fibrinolysis, 71.4%; PPCI, 83.3%; P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: With the development of medical treatment, the incidence and mortality rate of CR have decreased. However, first myocardial infarction, anterior infarct, female sex, and old age remain important risk factors for CR. Adjunctive cardioprotection against reperfusion-induced myocardial hemorrhage is emerging in the current PPCI era.
© 2014 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart rupture; mortality; myocardial infarction; reperfusion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25332178      PMCID: PMC4323797          DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.114.000984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc        ISSN: 2047-9980            Impact factor:   5.501


Introduction

Cardiac rupture (CR), which can include free‐wall rupture (FWR) or ventricular septal rupture (VSR), is a major lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Prior to the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) era, the incidence of CR was 6%[1-4] and known risk factors include female sex, old age, first myocardial infarction (MI), anterior infarct, and hypertension.[2,5-7] Becker and colleagues identified 3 morphological types of FWR. Type 1 rupture is characterized as an abrupt, slit‐like myocardial tear and corresponds to the acute phase of MI (<24 hours). In type 2 rupture, an area of myocardial erosion is evident, indicating a slowly progressive tear. Type 3 rupture has marked thinning of the myocardium and perforation in the central portion of aneurysm, which typically occurs during the late phase of MI (>7 days).[8] This pathological classification system can be also applied to VSR. Over the past several decades, the mortality rate for AMI has been decreasing with the development of reperfusion therapy and adjunctive pharmacological therapies.[9] Several studies have reported that early reperfusion therapy may also reduce the incidence of CR.[10-13] However, since the majority of these studies were performed over a relatively short time period, long‐term trends in the incidence of CR remain unclear. In addition, changes in the management of AMI may have influenced the risk factors or pathological characteristics of CR. For example, while early fibrinolysis can restore epicardial blood flow, late fibrinolysis may promote hemorrhagic dissection into the necrotic myocardium and accelerate rupture.[14-16] It remains unknown whether this paradoxical phenomenon occurs in the current PPCI era. Therefore, the present study was designed (1) to analyze whether the incidence of CR and its risk factors in patients with AMI have changed over a 35‐year period in association with advances in medical therapy, and (2) to analyze the association between pathological CR findings on autopsy and prior reperfusion therapy (no reperfusion, fibrinolysis, or PPCI).

Methods

Study Population

Beginning in September 1977, patients with AMI who were admitted to our institution were registered prospectively through the collection of information on clinical profiles and in‐hospital outcomes, including the development of CR. By December 2011, a total of 5699 consecutive patients with AMI were hospitalized at our institution. The patients were divided into 3 cohorts: 1977–1989 (n=1742), 1990–2000 (n=1921), and 2001–2011 (n=2036). Diagnosis of AMI was based on elevation of cardiac enzymes (creatine kinase MB fraction >2 times the upper limit of the normal range, or total creatine phosphokinase >2 times the upper limit of the normal range) along with at least 1 of the following criteria: (1) symptoms consistent with cardiac ischemia, (2) development of pathologic Q waves on electrocardiography, or (3) ST‐segment elevation or depression on electrocardiography.[17] This study was approved by the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Institutional Review Board for Clinical Research.

Data Collection

The following information was obtained from the AMI registry or medical record: age, sex, presence of coronary risk factors (hypertension, diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia), history of previous MI, use of reperfusion therapy during the early phase of AMI, presence of CR, emergent surgery status, and in‐hospital mortality. History of hypertension was defined as follows: from 1977 to 1999, systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥95 mm Hg, or antihypertensive therapy;[18] from 2000 to 2011, systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, or antihypertensive therapy.[19] Diagnosis of diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance was based on the World Health Organization criteria.[20] Dyslipidemia was defined as total cholesterol >220 mg/dL or dyslipidemia therapy. PPCI was defined as percutaneous coronary intervention in the infarct‐related artery within 12 hours of initial medical contact. Fibrinolysis was defined as intravenous or intracoronary administration of urokinase, prourokinase, or tissue plasminogen activator within 12 hours of initial medical contact. Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention was categorized as fibrinolysis.

Diagnosis of CR

Acute FWR was defined as an abrupt transmural rupture of the infarcted area, causing hemopericardium and death in <30 minutes. Subacute FWR was defined as a gradual or incomplete rupture of the infarcted area with slow or recurrent bleeding into the pericardial sac, causing progressive or recurrent cardiac tamponade.[21] VSR was diagnosed on the basis of abnormal shunting through the interventricular septum on color Doppler echocardiography or a significant increase in oxygen saturation in the right ventricle.[10]

Autopsy Study

Of a total of 551 consecutive autopsy cases with AMI, 64 had CR. We examined all 64 autopsy cases of CR with photomacrographs or heart specimens on autopsy. After fixation with 10% buffered formalin, specimens were sliced serially and transversely at 8‐mm intervals from apex to the base. Each coronary artery was cut transversely from the ostium to the periphery at 3‐ to 4‐mm intervals. The degree of luminal narrowing was recorded as a percentage of the vessel diameter. Patency of an infarct‐related artery was defined as the absence of total occlusion. Myocardial hemorrhage in an infarcted area was defined as grossly recognizable hemorrhage in the infarcted myocardium on macroscopic examination. The Becker classification was determined based on macroscopic findings of the heart. Representative CR autopsy cases of each Becker type are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Representative autopsy cases of CR. A, A 69‐year‐old woman with inferior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and Becker type 1 rupture. She underwent fibrinolysis 4 hours after the onset of AMI, and developed cardiac rupture (CR) 8 hours after the onset of AMI. Arrow indicates the inferior free‐wall rupture with massive myocardial hemorrhage. There is no wall thinning in the infarcted area. B, A 68‐year‐old man with anterior AMI and Becker type 2 rupture. He underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) 5 hours after the onset of AMI, and developed CR 11 hours after the onset of AMI. Arrow indicates the anterior free‐wall rupture with massive myocardial hemorrhage and erosion. Myocardial erosion at the site of rupture can be observed. C, An 87‐year‐old woman with anterior AMI and Becker type 3 rupture; reperfusion therapy was not performed. She developed CR 12 days after the onset of AMI. Arrow indicates the anterior free‐wall rupture with marked thinning of the infarcted myocardium.

Representative autopsy cases of CR. A, A 69‐year‐old woman with inferior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and Becker type 1 rupture. She underwent fibrinolysis 4 hours after the onset of AMI, and developed cardiac rupture (CR) 8 hours after the onset of AMI. Arrow indicates the inferior free‐wall rupture with massive myocardial hemorrhage. There is no wall thinning in the infarcted area. B, A 68‐year‐old man with anterior AMI and Becker type 2 rupture. He underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) 5 hours after the onset of AMI, and developed CR 11 hours after the onset of AMI. Arrow indicates the anterior free‐wall rupture with massive myocardial hemorrhage and erosion. Myocardial erosion at the site of rupture can be observed. C, An 87‐year‐old woman with anterior AMI and Becker type 3 rupture; reperfusion therapy was not performed. She developed CR 12 days after the onset of AMI. Arrow indicates the anterior free‐wall rupture with marked thinning of the infarcted myocardium.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages, and compared using the χ2 test. Continuous variables are presented as means±SD or medians (interquartile range). Differences between baseline characteristics of participants in the 3 cohorts defined by date of hospital admission (1977–1989, 1990–2000, and 2001–2011) were analyzed using the Cochrane–Armitage test for trend for proportions and the Jonckheere–Terpstra test for continuous measures. Non‐normally distributed continuous variables were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using ANOVA. For all tests, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. To identify risk factors for CR, univariable and multivariable Poisson regression models were constructed using the following variables: female sex, first MI, age >70 years, anterior infarct, hypertension, fibrinolysis, and PPCI. Stepwise selection with a P‐value of 0.1 for backward elimination was used to select the best predictive model. To assess the interaction effects of change in risk factors and different time periods, we included the product of time period and risk variables in multivariable models. All analyses were performed using the statistical software JMP 10.0.2 (SAS Institute Cary, NC, USA) and STATA, version 13 (STATA Corp LP, College Station, TX).

Results

Trends in the Clinical Characteristics of AMI Patients Over a 35‐Year Period

The characteristics of the patients in the 3 cohorts are shown in Table 1. Between 1977 and 2011, the mean age of patients with AMI increased from 63 to 68 years, the percentage of female patients increased from 20.2 to 27.4%, and prevalence of hypertension increased from 31.6 to 69.1% (P<0.001, respectively). Importantly, the use of reperfusion therapy significantly increased over time, from 2.5 to 70.7% (P<0.001). In particular, the use of PPCI dramatically increased from 0.2% in 1977–1989 to 66.6% in 2001–2011 (P<0.001) (Figure 2).
Table 1.

Characteristics of Patients With AMI (Total n=5699)

1977–1989 (n=1742)1990–2000 (n=1921)2001–2011 (n=2036)P for Trend
Age*, y63.0±10.965.5±11.268.1±12.1<0.001
Female, n (%)352 (20.2)426 (22.2)557 (27.4)<0.001
Hypertension, n (%)550 (31.6)1007 (52.4)1406 (69.1)<0.001
Diabetes or IGT, n (%)327 (18.8)679 (35.4)1113 (54.7)<0.001
Dyslipidemia, n (%)111 (6.4)706 (36.8)1151 (56.5)<0.001
Previous MI, n (%)372 (21.4)503 (26.2)345 (17.0)<0.001
Infarct location, n (%)
Anterior774 (44.4)866 (45.1)857 (42.1)0.069
Inferior512 (29.4)610 (31.8)782 (38.4)<0.001
Lateral146 (8.4)266 (13.9)277 (13.6)<0.001
Other310 (17.8)179 (9.3)120 (5.9)<0.001

AMI indicates acute myocardial infarction; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; MI, myocardial infarction.

Mean±SD data, Jonckheere–Terpstra test for trend.

Figure 2.

The incidence of cardiac rupture (CR) decreases in association with increased use of reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The left panel shows the incidence rate of CR in patients with AMI. The right‐upper panel shows the incidence of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for AMI. The right‐lower panel shows the incidence of fibrinolysis for AMI. A total of 5699 hospitalized AMI patients were divided into 3 cohorts: 1977–1989, 1990–2000, and 2001–2011.

Characteristics of Patients With AMI (Total n=5699) AMI indicates acute myocardial infarction; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; MI, myocardial infarction. Mean±SD data, Jonckheere–Terpstra test for trend. The incidence of cardiac rupture (CR) decreases in association with increased use of reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The left panel shows the incidence rate of CR in patients with AMI. The right‐upper panel shows the incidence of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for AMI. The right‐lower panel shows the incidence of fibrinolysis for AMI. A total of 5699 hospitalized AMI patients were divided into 3 cohorts: 1977–1989, 1990–2000, and 2001–2011.

Changes in the Incidence of CR Over Time

CR developed in 144 of 5699 patients, including 95 with FWR (n=60; acute, n=35; subacute, n=26) and 63 with VSR. FWR and VSR occurred together in 14 patients. The overall incidence of CR was 2.5%. The diagnosis of FWR was confirmed in 86 patients: 44 at autopsy, 33 during surgery, and 9 with pericardiocentesis. In the remaining 9 patients, the diagnosis of FWR was based on cardiac arrest or hypotension with echocardiographic evidence of cardiac tamponade. Diagnosis of VSR was confirmed in 57 patients: 28 during surgery and 29 at autopsy. In the remaining 6 patients, the diagnosis of VSR was made using right heart catheterization or Doppler echocardiography. Over time, the incidence of CR progressively decreased (3.3%, 2.8%, and 1.7%, respectively, for the 3 time periods studied; P=0.002) with increased use of PPCI (0.2%, 28.0%, 66.6%, respectively; P<0.001) (Figure 2). The incidence of CR was significantly lower among patients who underwent PPCI (1.2%) compared to patients treated with fibrinolysis (2.9%) or those who did not undergo reperfusion therapy (3.3%) (P<0.001 for both PPCI versus fibrinolysis and PPCI versus no reperfusion therapy).

Clinical Characteristics of Patients With CR and Changes in Risk Factors for CR

The clinical characteristics of patients with CR are shown in Table 2. Compared to all AMI patients, patients with CR were older and more likely to be women with a history of hypertension or an anterior infarct, whereas a previous history of MI and receiving reperfusion therapy were less common. Over the years, the prevalence of acute FWR decreased, whereas that of subacute FWR increased. The rate of emergent surgery increased over time (38.6%, 67.9%, 73.5%; P=0.003). In proportion with increases in the rate of emergent surgery, in‐hospital mortality of CR decreased over the years (89.5% in 1977–1989, 56.6% in 1990–2000, and 50.0% in 2001–2011; P=0.002) (Figure 3). The mortality rate of CR was significantly lower in patients who underwent emergent surgery than in those who did not (emergent surgery, 51.8% versus no emergent surgery [medical therapy], 90.2%; P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, acute FWR was a significant determinant for in‐hospital death in patients with CR. Emergent surgery seemed to be a protective factor against in‐hospital death in patients with CR, but was only marginally significant (P=0.056) (Table 3). The median time from onset of AMI to death from CR was comparable among the 3 cohorts: 7 days (interquartile range: 2.0 to 14.0) for 1977–1989, 5 days (interquartile range: 3.5 to 8.5) for 1990–2000, and 6 days (interquartile range: 2.75 to 16.0) for 2001–2011 (P=0.83). CR occurred most frequently in the first 24 hours after AMI throughout the study period (33.3% in 1977–1989, 36.0% in 1990–2000, 48.5% in 2001–2011; P=0.34).
Table 2.

Characteristics of Patients With CR (Total n=144)

1977–1989 (n=57)1990–2000 (n=53)2001–2011 (n=34)P for Trend
Age*, y70.2±8.371.6±8.875.8±9.20.012
Female, n (%)27 (47.4)28 (52.8)23 (67.7)0.166
Hypertension, n (%)44 (77.2)36 (67.9)25 (73.5)0.548
Diabetes or IGT, n (%)13 (22.8)24 (45.3)9 (26.5)0.038
Dyslipidemia, n (%)5 (8.9)9 (17.0)15 (44.1)0.001
Previous MI, n (%)5 (8.8)4 (7.6)1 (2.9)0.558
Time from symptom onset to admission >12 h, n (%)27 (47.4)24 (45.3)18 (52.9)0.545
Infarct location, n (%)
Anterior39 (68.4)30 (56.6)28 (82.4)0.043
Inferior12 (21.1)16 (30.2)2 (5.9)0.025
Lateral4 (7.0)7 (13.2)4 (11.8)0.545
Other2 (3.5)0 (0)0 (0)0.213
Reperfusion therapy, n (%)
Fibrinolysis2 (3.5)12 (22.6)1 (2.9)0.001
PPCI0 (0)11 (20.8)11 (32.4)<0.001
CABG, n (%)2 (3.5)7 (13.2)4 (11.8)0.169
Type of rupture, n (%)
Free‐wall rupture, acute32 (56.1)18 (34.0)10 (29.4)0.016
Free‐wall rupture, subacute5 (8.8)17 (32.1)13 (38.2)0.002
Ventricular septal rupture24 (42.1)23 (43.4)16 (47.1)0.897

Free‐wall rupture and ventricular septal rupture occurred together in 4 patients from 1977 to 1989, 5 patients from 1990 to 2000, 5 patients from 2001 to 2011. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; CR, cardiac rupture; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; MI, myocardial infarction; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Mean±SD data, Jonckheere–Terpstra test for trend.

Figure 3.

Decreased in‐hospital mortality is associated with an increased rate of emergent surgery in 144 cardiac rupture (CR) patients. The left panel shows the in‐hospital mortality rate in patients with CR. The right panel shows the rate of emergent surgery for CR.

Table 3.

Multivariable Analysis of Poisson Regression for In‐Hospital Deaths Due to CR

IRR95% CIP Value
Emergent surgery0.670.451.010.056
Free‐wall rupture, acute1.871.242.820.003

CR indicates cardiac rupture; IRR, incidence rate ratio.

Characteristics of Patients With CR (Total n=144) Free‐wall rupture and ventricular septal rupture occurred together in 4 patients from 1977 to 1989, 5 patients from 1990 to 2000, 5 patients from 2001 to 2011. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; CR, cardiac rupture; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; MI, myocardial infarction; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Mean±SD data, Jonckheere–Terpstra test for trend. Multivariable Analysis of Poisson Regression for In‐Hospital Deaths Due to CR CR indicates cardiac rupture; IRR, incidence rate ratio. Decreased in‐hospital mortality is associated with an increased rate of emergent surgery in 144 cardiac rupture (CR) patients. The left panel shows the in‐hospital mortality rate in patients with CR. The right panel shows the rate of emergent surgery for CR. Table 4 shows the results of the univariable and multivariable analyses of Poisson regression for risk factors of CR. In the multivariable analysis, age >70 years, female sex, hypertension, first MI, and anterior MI were significant risk factors for CR. On the other hand, later time period (ie, recent cohort) and PPCI were significant preventive factors for CR. The interaction terms between time and PPCI and between time and hypertension were statistically significant (Tables 5 and 6), whereas those between time and other factors (age >70 years, female sex, first MI, and anterior MI) were not. Univariable analysis in each time period showed that hypertension was a significant determinant of CR in the periods from 1977 to 1989 and 1990 to 2000, whereas it was an insignificant factor from 2001 to 2011. Importantly, PPCI became a significant protective factor against CR beginning in 2001 (Table 7).
Table 4.

Univariable and Multivariable Analysis of Poisson Regression for CR

UnivariableMultivariable
IRR95% CIP ValueIRR95% CIP Value
Age >70 y3.112.24.4<0.0012.431.693.5<0.001
Female3.862.785.36<0.0012.581.833.64<0.001
Hypertension2.491.723.59<0.0012.771.894.07<0.001
First MI3.671.936.97<0.0013.381.776.45<0.001
Anterior MI2.681.893.79<0.0012.331.643.31<0.001
Time0.730.590.890.0020.70.550.880.003
PPCI0.360.230.57<0.0010.380.230.63<0.001
Fibrinolysis1.170.681.990.571Not selected

Time 1: 1979–1988; Time 2: 1990–2000; Time 3: 2001–2011. CR indicates cardiac rupture; IRR, incidence rate ratio; MI, myocardial infarction; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Table 5.

Interaction Effect Between Time and PPCI

IRR95% CIP Value
Model 1
Time1.0030.7911.2720.981
PPCI3.5770.43329.5350.237
Time×PPCI0.4150.1790.9630.041
Model 2 adjusted for other risks
Age >70 y2.441.73.5<0.001
Female2.591.843.64<0.001
Hypertension2.721.854<0.001
First MI3.421.86.53<0.001
Anterior MI2.311.633.28<0.001
Time0.740.580.940.014
PPCI2.490.2921.620.409
Time×PPCI0.470.21.120.09

Model 1: Variables were selected by stepwise procedures. Model 2: Model 1+the interaction term between the time and PPCI. IRR indicates incidence rate ratio; MI, myocardial infarction; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Table 6.

Interaction Effect Between Time and Hypertension

IRR95% CIP Value
Model 1
Time1.180.81.74<0.417
Hypertension15.896.2240.63<0.001
Time×hypertension0.40.250.63<0.001
Model 2 adjusted for other risks
Age >70 y2.491.733.57<0.001
Female2.561.823.61<0.001
Hypertension13.825.3635.67<0.001
First MI3.371.776.42<0.001
Anterior MI2.331.643.3<0.001
Time1.390.922.09<0.115
PPCI0.390.230.64<0.001
Time×hypertension0.40.250.63<0.001

Model 1: Variables were selected by stepwise procedures. Model 2: Model 1+the interaction term between the time and hypertension. IRR indicates incidence rate ratio; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Table 7.

Risk Factors for CR in Each Time Period

Non‐PPCIIRRP Value95% CI
Referencen.a.Reference
PPCI conducted from 1977 to 19896.21∙10−60.9784.1∙10−3069.4∙10296
PPCI conducted from 1990 to 20000.640.1520.341.18
PPCI conducted from 2001 to 20110.25<0.0010.140.47

The dummy variables from categories of the interaction term between time and PPCI were simultaneously included in the Poisson model. CR indicates cardiac rupture; IRR, incidence rate ratio; n.a., not available; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Univariable and Multivariable Analysis of Poisson Regression for CR Time 1: 1979–1988; Time 2: 1990–2000; Time 3: 2001–2011. CR indicates cardiac rupture; IRR, incidence rate ratio; MI, myocardial infarction; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Interaction Effect Between Time and PPCI Model 1: Variables were selected by stepwise procedures. Model 2: Model 1+the interaction term between the time and PPCI. IRR indicates incidence rate ratio; MI, myocardial infarction; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention Interaction Effect Between Time and Hypertension Model 1: Variables were selected by stepwise procedures. Model 2: Model 1+the interaction term between the time and hypertension. IRR indicates incidence rate ratio; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Risk Factors for CR in Each Time Period The dummy variables from categories of the interaction term between time and PPCI were simultaneously included in the Poisson model. CR indicates cardiac rupture; IRR, incidence rate ratio; n.a., not available; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Pathological Examinations in 63 Autopsy Cases With CR

Between 1977 and 2011, 99 of the 144 patients with CR died. Autopsy was performed in 64 cases. One autopsy case was excluded from our analysis due to incomplete data on the pathological findings. The characteristics of 63 autopsy cases are summarized in Table 8. In the PPCI group, coronary stenting was performed in 4 of 6 patients, while in the fibrinolysis group, rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (without stenting) was performed in 2 of 7 patients. Regarding pathological findings, the rate of patency in the infarct‐related artery was higher in patients with PPCI compared with those without reperfusion therapy. The incidence of myocardial hemorrhage in infarcted areas was higher in patients who underwent PPCI or fibrinolysis than those receiving no reperfusion therapy (Figure 4). In patients who did not undergo reperfusion therapy, Becker type 3 rupture was the most frequent type (no reperfusion therapy: type 1, 24.5%; type 2, 30.6%; type 3, 44.9%). In contrast, ruptures of Becker types 1 and 2 were more frequent in patients who underwent reperfusion therapy, especially PPCI, than in patients who did not (fibrinolysis: type 1, 28.6%; type 2, 42.9%; type 3, 28.6%) (PPCI: type 1, 50.0%; type 2, 33.3%; type 3, 16.7%); however, this difference in frequency was not statistically significant (55.1% with no reperfusion therapy versus 76.9% with reperfusion therapy (fibrinolysis or PPCI); P=0.154).
Table 8.

Characteristics of Autopsy Cases With CR (n=63)

No reperfusion Tx (n=50)Fibrinolysis (n=7)PPCI (n=6)P Value
Age*, y71.5±8.873.1±5.874.7±7.00.639
Female, n (%)26 (52.0)3 (42.9)1 (16.7)0.253
Hypertension, n (%)41 (82.0)6 (85.7)5 (83.3)0.970
Diabetes or IGT, n (%)13 (26.0)3 (42.9)3 (50.0)0.356
Dyslipidemia, n (%)6 (12.0)2 (33.3)1 (14.3)0.356
Previous MI, n (%)3 (6.0)1 (14.3)0 (0)0.560
Time from symptom onset to admission >12 h, n (%)26 (52.0)1 (14.3)1 (16.7)0.078
Infarct location, n (%)
Anterior35 (70.0)4 (57.1)4 (66.7)0.788
Inferior11 (22.0)3 (42.9)2 (33.3)0.443
Lateral4 (8.0)0 (0)0 (0)0.574
Other0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
CABG, n (%)3 (6.0)0 (0)1 (16.7)0.459
Type of rupture, n (%)
Free‐wall rupture, acute27 (54.0)4 (57.1)4 (66.7)0.837
Free‐wall rupture, subacute7 (14.0)1 (14.3)1 (16.7)0.985
Ventricular septal rupture22 (44.0)3 (42.9)5 (83.3)0.183

Free‐wall rupture and ventricular septal rupture were observed together in 6 patients in the no‐reperfusion‐therapy group, 1 patient in the fibrinolysis group, and 5 patients in the PPCI group. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass; CR, cardiac rupture; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; MI, myocardial infarction; grafting; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention; Tx, therapy.

Mean±SD.

Figure 4.

Increased incidence of myocardial hemorrhage is associated with an increased patency rate of infarct‐related arteries based on autopsy data. The left panel shows the incidence rate of myocardial hemorrhage in the infarcted area. The right panel shows the patency rate of the infarct‐related artery. Sixty‐three autopsy patients with cardiac rupture were divided into the following 3 groups: no reperfusion therapy (Tx), reperfusion with fibrinolysis, and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). n.s. indicates not significant.

Characteristics of Autopsy Cases With CR (n=63) Free‐wall rupture and ventricular septal rupture were observed together in 6 patients in the no‐reperfusion‐therapy group, 1 patient in the fibrinolysis group, and 5 patients in the PPCI group. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass; CR, cardiac rupture; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; MI, myocardial infarction; grafting; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention; Tx, therapy. Mean±SD. Increased incidence of myocardial hemorrhage is associated with an increased patency rate of infarct‐related arteries based on autopsy data. The left panel shows the incidence rate of myocardial hemorrhage in the infarcted area. The right panel shows the patency rate of the infarct‐related artery. Sixty‐three autopsy patients with cardiac rupture were divided into the following 3 groups: no reperfusion therapy (Tx), reperfusion with fibrinolysis, and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). n.s. indicates not significant.

Discussion

The major findings of this study were as follows: (1) over 35 years, the incidence of CR decreased in association with increased use of reperfusion therapy, especially PPCI; (2) in the past decade (2001–2011), first MI, anterior infarct, female sex, and age >70 years were risk factors for CR, whereas PPCI was a significant protective factor and hypertension was no longer a significant risk factor for CR; and (3) based on pathological examination, the incidence of myocardial hemorrhage in infarcted areas and the proportion of Becker type 1 and 2 ruptures were higher in patients undergoing PPCI or fibrinolysis than in those who did not receive reperfusion therapy.

Decreased Incidence of CR in Patients With AMI and the Important Role of PPCI

Previous studies have reported that the incidence of CR was as high as 6% before the reperfusion era.[1-4] The incidence of CR in patients undergoing PPCI during the reperfusion era has ranged from 0.5 to 2.0%, which is lower than that observed in patients undergoing fibrinolysis or no reperfusion therapy.[11-12,11-25] However, there are very few longitudinal studies. Figueras et al[3] demonstrated that the incidence of CR before the reperfusion era was approximately 6%, and it decreased to 3.2% in 2001–2006 with increasing use of reperfusion therapy. The present study, with data over 35 years, clearly demonstrates in Figure 2 that the incidence of CR decreased with increasing use of reperfusion therapy over time. Indeed, PPCI became a significant protective factor against CR in the most recent period, 2001–2011 (Table 7). These findings indicate that reperfusion therapy, especially PPCI, can prevent transmural progression of myocardial necrosis through early recanalization of the infarct‐related artery.[9] The present study showed that first MI, anterior infarct, female sex, and age >70 years remain significant risk factors for CR even in the most recent decade, consistent with previous findings.[3,10-11,10-23,10-26] High blood pressure could play an important role in the development of CR since it dramatically increases intracavitary pressures and shear stress force against the necrotic area during myocardial contraction, leading to a tear.[27] In fact, studies performed several decades ago have reported an association between high blood pressure and an increased incidence of CR.[7,28-30] Importantly, along with other studies,[22,31-32] the present study also demonstrated that hypertension ceased to be significantly associated with CR in the most recent period. This finding may at least in part be due to changes in the definition of hypertension and the recommended post‐AMI management of blood pressure (eg, β‐blockers and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors) during the past several decades.

High Incidence of Myocardial Hemorrhage in Patients With CR Undergoing Reperfusion Therapy Confirmed by Pathological Examination

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the association between pathological findings of CR and reperfusion therapy in patients with AMI. Before the reperfusion era, acute total occlusion of a coronary artery usually led to transmural myocardial necrosis and resulted in ventricular wall thinning or aneurysm formation.[33] In the present study, Becker type 3 rupture accompanied by wall thinning was the common type of CR in autopsy cases of patients who did not undergo reperfusion therapy. This finding is probably related to extensive myocardial necrosis. On the other hand, the proportion of Becker type 1 or 2 rupture was higher in patients with CR who underwent reperfusion therapy. The increase in the incidence of myocardial hemorrhage in patients who underwent reperfusion therapy, especially with a patent infarct‐related artery (Figure 4), may be associated with an increased proportion of Becker type 1 or 2 rupture. Myocardial hemorrhage is a phenomenon that reflects severe microvascular damage and reperfusion injury following AMI.[34-35] Previous studies have demonstrated that myocardial hemorrhage could create dissections in the infarcted myocardium and delay the healing process.[36-39] In a previous autopsy study,[40] 14 cases had undergone pharmacologic or combined forms of reperfusion therapy (13 streptokinase and 1 tissue‐type plasminogen activator, including 4 with combined balloon angioplasty) and 5 had had purely mechanical therapy (balloon angioplasty). Hemorrhagic myocardial infarction was detected in all 14 patients who received pharmacologic or combined forms of reperfusion therapy, whereas it was not detected in any of the 5 patients who were treated with balloon angioplasty therapy alone. Similar findings of relatively minimal hemorrhagic injury following direct angiography were observed in an experimental myocardial infarction model using right coronary artery occlusion in open‐chest dogs.[41] An important finding of the present study was that reperfusion with both modalities resulted in a statistically higher incidence of myocardial hemorrhage associated with CR. The discrepancy between our autopsy study and previous ones may be related at least in part to the patency of the infarcted artery treated with coronary stents (Figure 4).[42-45] Indeed, recent studies using cardiac MRI showed that myocardial hemorrhage occurred in 25% to 40% of AMI patients undergoing PPCI and was associated with adverse left ventricular remodeling.[35,46] Thus, our data raise the possibility that in general PPCI reduces the incidence of CR, but in some cases it may induce reperfusion injury and myocardial hemorrhage, consequently accelerating Becker type 1 and 2 ruptures.

Perspectives on Preventing CR and Decreasing Associated Mortality in the Future

The natural history of CR is catastrophic, and medical treatment alone results in close to 100% mortality. Urgent surgical repair provides the best chance of survival in patients with CR.[10,47-49] The present study showed that the mortality rate of CR decreased to 50% with increasing use of emergent surgery. Over the years, the proportion of acute FWR decreased, while that of subacute FWR increased (Table 2). This finding may also be related to pathological observations. Reperfusion therapy has resulted in a pathological shift in CR type away from frank sudden rupture of a thinned free wall toward a slit‐like rupture, which presents more subacutely and thus increases the possibility that surgical intervention can be attempted. At present, the most effective strategy for preventing CR following AMI is early revascularization by PPCI. However, the present pathological study also suggests a dark side to reperfusion therapy. CR patients undergoing PPCI have a higher prevalence of myocardial hemorrhage, which may be related in part to reperfusion injury. Thus, preventing reperfusion injury might be a novel target in future adjunctive treatment of AMI in order to achieve further reductions in the incidence of CR.

Limitations

The present study is a retrospective observational study. Therefore, some information that might affect the incidence of CR after AMI was unavailable or incomplete, such as the type (ST‐segment or non–ST‐segment elevation) of MI, cardiac enzyme levels, details on medical treatment before CR, and admission delays. Furthermore, data regarding the time from onset to reperfusion, which is important in terms of protecting the myocardium, were not available in all members of the AMI cohort. However, a prospective observational study could be difficult to perform because CR is rare in this era of reperfusion therapy. Although we conducted histological evaluations of autopsy cases in addition to our clinical review, the possibility of ascertainment bias or missing cases cannot be ruled out. In addition, it should be noted that our autopsy study results are based on a limited number of nonconsecutive patients.

Conclusions

Over the past several decades, the incidence of CR has decreased with the development of PPCI. However, first MI, anterior infarct, female sex, and age >70 years remain important risk factors for CR. Adjunctive cardioprotection against reperfusion injury is emerging in the current reperfusion era.
  49 in total

1.  Risk factors, angiographic patterns, and outcomes in patients with ventricular septal defect complicating acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO-I (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Trial Investigators.

Authors:  B S Crenshaw; C B Granger; Y Birnbaum; K S Pieper; D C Morris; N S Kleiman; A Vahanian; R M Califf; E J Topol
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000 Jan 4-11       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Clinical and electrocardiographic features of cardiac rupture following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H S Friedman; L A Kuhn; A M Katz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 3.  Diabetes mellitus. Report of a WHO Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1985

4.  Cardiac rupture in acute myocardial infarction. A review of 72 consecutive cases.

Authors:  S Rasmussen; A Leth; E Kjøller; A Pedersen
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1979

5.  Ventricular free wall rupture: sudden, subacute, slow, sealed and stabilized varieties.

Authors:  K Balakumaran; C J Verbaan; C E Essed; J Nauta; E Bos; M M Haalebos; O Penn; M L Simoons; P G Hugenholtz
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Rupture of the myocardium. Occurrence and risk factors.

Authors:  M Dellborg; P Held; K Swedberg; A Vedin
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-07

7.  Therapeutic management changes and mortality rates over 30 years in ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Sophie Morillon-Lutun; Delphine Maucort-Boulch; Nathan Mewton; Fadi Farhat; Didier Bresson; Nicolas Girerd; Olivier Desebbe; Roland Henaine; Gilbert Kirkorian; Eric Bonnefoy-Cudraz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  Ventricular free wall rupture following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yochai Birnbaum; Antonio J Chamoun; Angelo Anzuini; Scott D Lick; Masood Ahmad; Barry F Uretsky
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.439

9.  Impact of myocardial haemorrhage on left ventricular function and remodelling in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Javier Ganame; Giancarlo Messalli; Steven Dymarkowski; Frank E Rademakers; Walter Desmet; Frans Van de Werf; Jan Bogaert
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Cardiac rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction in the direct percutaneous coronary intervention reperfusion era.

Authors:  Hon-Kan Yip; Chiung-Jen Wu; Hsueh-Wen Chang; Chao-Ping Wang; Cheng-I Cheng; Sarah Chua; Mien-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Extracellular Matrix in Ischemic Heart Disease, Part 4/4: JACC Focus Seminar.

Authors:  Nikolaos G Frangogiannis; Jason C Kovacic
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  The extracellular matrix in myocardial injury, repair, and remodeling.

Authors:  Nikolaos G Frangogiannis
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Ectonucleotidase CD39-driven control of postinfarction myocardial repair and rupture.

Authors:  Nadia R Sutton; Takanori Hayasaki; Matthew C Hyman; Anuli C Anyanwu; Hui Liao; Danica Petrovic-Djergovic; Linda Badri; Amy E Baek; Natalie Walker; Keigo Fukase; Yogendra Kanthi; Scott H Visovatti; Ellen L Horste; Jessica J Ray; Sascha N Goonewardena; David J Pinsky
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-01-12

4.  Healing a Broken Heart: a Case Report of Left Ventricular Free Wall Rupture and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Roxana Oana Darabont; Alexandru Vasilescu; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2016-12

5.  Comparing patient outcomes following minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting surgery vs. coronary artery bypass grafting: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lin Liang; Xiaolong Ma; Qingyu Kong; Wei Xiao; Jiaji Liu; Liqun Chi; Junming Zhu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-06

Review 6.  Sutureless repair techniques for post-infarction left ventricular free wall rupture.

Authors:  Homare Okamura
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-05

Review 7.  Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Settings.

Authors:  Mohamed A Omer; Jose E Exaire; Jacob C Jentzer; Yader B Sandoval; Mandeep Singh; Charles R Cagin; Islam Y Elgendy; Tahir Tak
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-02-12

8.  ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Management and association with prognosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in France.

Authors:  Guillaume Bonnet; Vassili Panagides; Mathieu Becker; Nicolas Rivière; Cédric Yvorel; Antoine Deney; Benoit Lattuca; Benjamin Duband; Karim Moussa; Léa Juenin; Thibault Pamart; Carl Semaan; Sabrina Uhry; Nathalie Noirclerc; Flavien Vincent; Maxime Vignac; Vincenzo Palermo; Anne Sophie Martin; Michel Zeitouni; Eric Van Belle; Ashok Tirouvanziam; Aurélie Manchuelle; Chekrallah Chamandi; Mathieu Kerneis; Madjid Boukantar; Loïc Belle; Fabien De Poli; Denis Angoulvant; Nicolas Meneveau; Marie Robin; Michel Pansieri; Laurent Bonello; Pascal Motreff; Frédéric Bouisset; Karl Isaaz; Laura Cetran; Khalifé Khalife; Pierluigi Lesizza; Julien Adjedj; Hakim Benamer; Guillaume Cayla
Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.196

Review 9.  Reperfusion therapy reduces the risk of myocardial rupture complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Eric R Bates
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Mechanical Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Abdulla A Damluji; Sean van Diepen; Jason N Katz; Venu Menon; Jacqueline E Tamis-Holland; Marie Bakitas; Mauricio G Cohen; Leora B Balsam; Joanna Chikwe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 39.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.