| Literature DB >> 32912064 |
Yu-Chia Hsieh1, Shi-Heng Wang2, Yi-Yin Chen1, Tzu-Lung Lin3, Shian-Sen Shie4, Ching-Tai Huang4, Chen-Hsiang Lee5, Yi-Ching Chen1, Tran Lam Tu Quyen6, Yi-Jiun Pan6.
Abstract
Acinetobacter baumannii emerged as one of the most important pathogens that causes nosocomial infections due to its increased multidrug resistance. Identifying capsular epidemiology in A. baumannii can aid in the development of effective treatments and preventive measures against this emerging pathogen. Here we established a wzc-based method, and combined it with wzy-PCR to determine capsular types of A. baumannii causing nosocomial bacteraemia collected at two medical centres in Taiwan from 2015 to 2017. Among the 237 patients with A. baumannii bacteraemia, 98 (41.4%) isolates were resistant to carbapenems. Four prevalent capsular types (KL2, KL10, KL22, and KL52) accounted for 84.7% of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) and 12.2% of non-CRAB. The rate of pneumonia, intensive care unit admission, APACHE II score, and Pitt bacteraemia score were higher in patients with KL2/10/22/52 infection than in those with non-KL2/10/22/52 infection. Patients with KL2/10/22/52 infection and patients with CRAB infection have a higher cumulative incidence of attributable and all-cause in-hospital 30-day mortality. On multivariate analysis, appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy within 24 h was associated with a lower risk of 30-day attributable mortality in the KL2/10/22/52 isolates (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.66, p = 0.008) but not in non-KL2/10/22/52 isolates. Early recognition of carbapenem resistance-associated capsular types may help clinicians to promptly implement appropriate antimicrobial therapy for improving the outcomes in patients with CRAB bacteraemia.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii ; capsular type; carbapenem resistance; serotype; typing system
Year: 2020 PMID: 32912064 PMCID: PMC7534287 DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1822757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Microbes Infect ISSN: 2222-1751 Impact factor: 7.163
Figure 1. Flow diagram of capsular typing using wzc-based method followed by wzy-PCR genotyping and samples collection.
Figure 2.The distribution of Acinetobacter baumannii capsular types with or without carbapenem resistance during 2015–2017. Number of isolates were shown in parentheses.
Demographic characteristics, underlying diseases, sources of infection, clinical characteristics of patients with Acinetobacter baumannii Bacteraemia.
| KL type | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 ( | 10 ( | 22 ( | 52 ( | Other ( | |||
| Male, number (%) | 19 (65.5) | 16 (72.7) | 13 (52.0) | 16 (66.7) | 77 (56.2) | 0.46 | 0.28 |
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 68.0 (12.6) | 58.5 (13.7) | 65.9 (13.1) | 60.3 (16.2) | 62.8 (13.9) | 0.09 | 0.68 |
| Charlson score, mean (SD) | 4.5 (2.8) | 5.2 (3.4) | 4.3 (2.2) | 4.0 (2.2) | 5.0 (2.5) | 0.31 | 0.15 |
| Underlying conditions, number (%) | |||||||
| DM with end organ disease | 1 (3.5) | 3 (13.6) | 5 (20.0) | 5 (20.8) | 10 (7.3) | 0.05 | 0.13 |
| Liver cirrhosis | 8 (27.6) | 4 (18.2) | 4 (16.0) | 3 (12.5) | 21 (15.3) | 0.57 | 0.49 |
| Hypertension | 12 (41.4) | 14 (63.6) | 10 (40.0) | 11 (45.8) | 55 (40.2) | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Coronary artery disease | 1 (3.5) | 5 (22.7) | 2 (8.0) | 1 (4.2) | 13 (9.5) | 0.21 | 0.99 |
| Congestive heart failure | 0 (0.0) | 3 (13.6) | 2 (8.0) | 5 (20.8) | 14 (10.2) | 0.1 | 0.99 |
| Chronic renal insufficiency | 4 (13.8) | 11 (50.0) | 10 (40.0) | 11 (45.8) | 28 (20.4) | 0.001 | 0.01 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 6 (20.7) | 2 (9.1) | 5 (20.0) | 2 (8.3) | 11 (8.0) | 0.16 | 0.1 |
| Autoimmune disease | 2 (6.9) | 1 (4.6) | 2 (8.0) | 1 (4.2) | 2 (1.5) | 0.11 | 0.07 |
| Tumour with metastases | 3 (10.3) | 6 (27.3) | 2 (8.0) | 2 (8.3) | 49 (35.8) | 0.0006 | <0.0001 |
| Leukemia | 1 (3.5) | 1 (4.6) | 1 (4.0) | 1 (4.2) | 9 (6.6) | 0.99 | 0.57 |
| Lymphoma | 1 (3.5) | 1 (4.6) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Solid malignancy | 11 (37.9) | 9 (40.9) | 8 (32.0) | 3 (12.5) | 61 (44.5) | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Use of immunosuppressive agent, number (%) | 4 (13.8) | 9 (40.9) | 7 (28.0) | 5 (20.8) | 43 (31.4) | 0.2 | 0.31 |
| Source of bacteraemia, number (%) | 2 (6.9) | 1 (4.6) | 1 (4.0) | 2 (8.3) | 19 (13.9) | 0.55 | 0.06 |
| Primary bacteraemia | |||||||
| Pneumonia | 19 (65.5) | 13 (59.1) | 16 (64.0) | 12 (50.0) | 37 (27.0) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Ventilator-associated pneumonia | 16 (55.2) | 10 (45.5) | 14 (56.0) | 8 (33.3) | 7 (5.1) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Central venous catheter (CLABSI) | 13 (44.8) | 9 (40.9) | 3 (12.0) | 6 (25.0) | 50 (36.5) | 0.06 | 0.41 |
| Intra-abdominal infection | 1 (3.5) | 1 (4.6) | 1 (4.0) | 3 (12.5) | 19 (13.9) | 0.35 | 0.06 |
| Surgical site infection | 3 (10.3) | 2 (9.1) | 2 (8.0) | 1 (4.2) | 6 (4.4) | 0.5 | 0.27 |
| Urinary tract infection | 3 (10.3) | 2 (9.1) | 2 (8.0) | 2 (8.3) | 11 (8.0) | 0.99 | 0.82 |
| Foley’s catheter | 2 (6.9) | 2 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.2) | 2 (1.5) | 0.09 | 0.14 |
| Polymicrobial bacteraemia, number (%) | 11 (37.9) | 6 (27.3) | 7 (28.0) | 10 (41.7) | 56 (40.9) | 0.62 | 0.34 |
| Carbapenem resistant, number (%) | 20 (69.0) | 21 (95.5) | 24 (96.0) | 18 (75.0) | 15 (11.0) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Appropriate empirical antimicrobial
therapy | 9 (31.0) | 7 (31.8) | 3 (12.0) | 11 (45.8) | 83 (60.6) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| ICU, number (%) | 13 (44.8) | 14 (63.6) | 12 (48.0) | 15 (62.5) | 30 (21.9) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| ICU stay days, mean (SD) | 36.8 (21.4) | 42.8 (50.9) | 25.0 (17.6) | 24.8 (26.2) | 16.2 (18.4) | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| APACHE II score (if ICU = y), mean (SD) | 25.0 (5.5) | 25.0 (6.0) | 24.8 (9.1) | 24.9 (9.0) | 19.6 (8.8) | 0.08 | 0.004 |
| Pitt score, mean (SD) | 3.6 (3.6) | 4.9 (4.0) | 4.8 (3.9) | 4.5 (3.5) | 2.4 (3.2) | 0.0003 | <0.0001 |
| Hospital stay days, mean (SD) | 22.0 (22.0) | 27.3 (36.1) | 15.4 (28.3) | 25.5 (29.3) | 21.2 (25.5) | 0.58 | 0.74 |
| All cause in hospital mortality, number (%) | 15 (51.7) | 14 (63.6) | 22 (88.0) | 14 (58.3) | 45 (32.9) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Within 14 days | 10 (34.5) | 8 (36.4) | 15 (60.0) | 9 (37.5) | 31 (22.6) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Within 30 days | 13 (44.8) | 10 (45.5) | 21 (84.0) | 10 (41.7) | 38 (27.7) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Attributable mortality, number (%) | 9 (31.0) | 10 (45.5) | 19 (76.0) | 10 (41.7) | 33 (24.1) | <0.0001 | 0.0002 |
| Within 14 days | 8 (27.6) | 9 (40.9) | 14 (56.0) | 8 (33.3) | 30 (21.9) | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Within 30 days | 9 (31.0) | 10 (45.5) | 18 (72.0) | 8 (33.3) | 33 (24.1) | 0.0001 | 0.0008 |
Note: DM: diabetes mellitus, ICU: intensive care unit, APACHE: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, CLABSI, central line associated blood stream infection.
appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy within 24 h was defined by in vitro susceptibility test.
*ANOVA test or Fisher exact test.
Figure 3.Time to occurrence of all-cause mortality within 30 days in (A) Four major K-type KL2/10/22/52 v.s. other types (B) Carbapenem resistance, Yes v.s. No. Time to occurrence of attributable mortality within 30 days in (C) Four major K-type KL2/10/22/52 v.s. other types (D) Carbapenem resistance, Yes v.s. No.
Association between capsular type and outcomes.
| 30-days Attributable Mortality | 30-days all-cause Mortality | Carbapenem resistance | Pitt score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model: adjustment | OR (95% CI)* | OR (95% CI)* | OR (95% CI)* | beta (95% CI)# | ||||
| M0: Crude model | 2.58 (1.48–4.49) | 0.0008 | 3.06 (1.78–5.26) | <0.0001 | 39.71 (18.79–83.92) | <0.0001 | 2.01 (1.12, 2.90) | <0.0001 |
| M1: sex, age, Charlson score, ICU | 2.26 (1.25–4.09) | 0.007 | 2.60 (1.46–4.65) | 0.001 | 38.93 (16.90–89.70) | <0.0001 | 1.62 (0.68, 2.57) | 0.0008 |
| M2: M1, Pneumonia | 1.60 (0.84–3.04) | 0.15 | 1.88 (1.01–3.51) | 0.05 | 35.93 (14.90–86.68) | <0.0001 | 0.97 (0.03, 1.91) | 0.04 |
| M3: M2, Appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy a within 24 h | 1.30 (0.66–2.56) | 0.45 | 1.80 (0.93–3.48) | 0.08 | 28.26 (11.54–69.21) | <0.0001 | 0.92 (−0.07, 1.92) | 0.07 |
| M4: M3, Carbapenem resistance | 0.47 (0.17–1.24) | 0.13 | 0.64 (0.25–1.63) | 0.35 | 0.26 (−0.97, 1.50) | 0.68 | ||
Note: ICU: intensive care unit.
appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy within 24 h was defined by in vitro susceptibility test.
*estimated from logistic regression model; #estimated from linear regression model. Severity of illness was assessed using Pitt score [25].
Association between carbapenem resistance, appropriate antibiotic treatment within 24 h, and 30-days attributable mortality, stratified by capsular types.
| Non-2/10/22/52 ( | 2/10/22/52 ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI)* | OR (95% CI)* | ||||
| Sex | 1.47 (0.54–4.01) | 0.45 | 0.75 (0.25–2.32) | 0.62 | 0.43 |
| Age | 1.03 (0.99–1.07) | 0.18 | 0.99 (0.95–1.04) | 0.79 | 0.58 |
| Charlson score | 1.10 (0.89–1.35) | 0.39 | 1.13 (0.90–1.42) | 0.30 | 0.92 |
| Pneumonia | 1.64 (0.58–4.61) | 0.35 | 3.89 (1.20–12.63) | 0.02 | 0.37 |
| Pitt score | 1.43 (1.21–1.69) | <0.0001 | 1.40 (1.15–1.70) | 0.0007 | 0.70 |
| Appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy a within 24 h | 1.50 (0.51–4.39) | 0.46 | 0.19 (0.06–0.66) | 0.008 | 0.02 |
| Carbapenem resistance | 3.86 (0.88–16.93) | 0.07 | 7.90 (1.25–49.82) | 0.03 | 0.33 |
appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy within 24 h was defined by in vitro susceptibility test.
*estimated from logistic regression model.
Association between capsular type, appropriate antibiotic treatment within 24 h, and 30-days attributable mortality, stratified by carbapenem resistance.
| Carbapenem resistance:
N | Carbapenem resistance: Y
( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI)* | OR (95% CI)* | ||||
| KL2/10/22/52 v.s. non-KL2/10/22/52 | 0.24 (0.04–1.47) | 0.13 | 0.59 (0.13–2.64) | 0.49 | 0.33 |
| Sex | 1.81 (0.64–5.08) | 0.26 | 0.76 (0.26–2.21) | 0.61 | 0.29 |
| Age | 1.03 (0.99–1.08) | 0.12 | 0.99 (0.95–1.03) | 0.57 | 0.20 |
| Charlson score | 1.08 (0.88–1.32) | 0.46 | 1.09 (0.87–1.37) | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Pneumonia | 2.26 (0.81–6.35) | 0.12 | 1.51 (0.50–4.52) | 0.46 | 0.95 |
| Pitt score | 1.31 (1.13–1.52) | 0.0004 | 1.56 (1.25–1.96) | 0.0001 | 0.17 |
| Appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy a within 24 h | 1.05 (0.37–2.97) | 0.93 | 0.23 (0.07–0.77) | 0.02 | 0.22 |
appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy within 24 h was defined by in vitro susceptibility test.
*estimated from logistic regression model.