| Literature DB >> 32911844 |
Douâa Moussa Agha1, Redouane Rouas1, Mehdi Najar2,3, Fatima Bouhtit1,3, Hussein Fayyad-Kazan4, Laurence Lagneaux5, Dominique Bron1, Nathalie Meuleman1, Philippe Lewalle1, Makram Merimi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematopoietic malignancy in which antitumor immunity is impaired. The therapeutic management of AML requires understanding the mechanisms involved in the fragility and immune dysfunction of AML T lymphocytes.Entities:
Keywords: AML; T lymphocytes; apoptosis; extracellular vesicles; immunosuppression; miR21
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32911844 PMCID: PMC7563595 DOI: 10.3390/cells9092053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Summary of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient clinical details used for the analysis.
| Clinical details of AML patients (27) | Number |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Males | 13 |
| Females | 14 |
| Age < 55y | 9 |
| Age ≥ 55y | 18 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Normal Karyotype | 3 |
| Chromosome 9 deletion | 2 |
| Inversion (16) MYH11-CBFB | 2 |
| Translocation (t8;21) | 2 |
| Translocation (t15;17) | 3 |
| Translocation (X:21) (p11;q22) | 1 |
| trisomy 8 | 1 |
| complex Karyotype | 1 |
|
| |
| AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities (t8;21) | 2 |
| AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities (inv 16) | 2 |
| AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities (t15;17) | 3 |
| Acute monoblastic/monocytic leukemia | 1 |
| Pure erythroid leukemia | 1 |
| AML not otherwise specified (NOS) | 15 |
| unknown | 3 |
|
| |
| Favorable | 10 |
| Intermediate | 3 |
| Adverse | 10 |
| unknown | 4 |
The classification of AML patients was performed according to WHO 2016 classification [1]. The genetic risk stratification of AML patients was done according to 2017 European LeukemiaNet genetic risk stratification [1]: Favorable = good prognosis; IT = intermediate prognosis; adverse = adverse risk.
Figure 1Fragility measurement of AML T lymphocytes. (A) The viability percentage of isolated and activated T lymphocytes (PHA/IL2) was measured in HD and untreated AML patients (=7) within six days post culture using an apoptosis test (cells were labeled with annexin-V-FITC and PI). The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.01 (**). (B) Relative expression of proapoptotic and antiapoptotic genes in AML T lymphocytes (=27) compared to cells from HDs (=11) in both bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples as determined using Affymetrix microarray (fold change >1.25 and p < 0.05).
Figure 2Myeloid leukemia cell line-derived EVs induce cell death in healthy donors (HD) T lymphocytes. (A) Characterization of K562-derived EVs. K562 EVs were characterized by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). They ranged in size from 100 nm to 500 nm, with a mean value of 185 nm. The concentration of K562 EVs reached 28.05 × 109 ± 25.05 × 107 particles/mL. (B) The viability percentage of T lymphocytes (=3) was measured by an apoptosis test after the addition of K562 cell line-derived microvesicles (MVs) at different concentrations. The concentrations used for the MVs derived from HL60 and KG1 cells were similar to those used in the condition of 150 μl for the K562-MVs. MC: medium control. TPE: EV elution buffer. (C) Analysis of miRNA expression in the cargo of EVs purified from the supernatants of K562, KG1 and HL60 cells. The graph shows the expression curves of 385 miRNAs amplified using the TaqMan® Array Human MicroRNA assay. The levels of statistical significance were set at p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***).
Common miRNAs expressed in extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from myeloid leukemia cell lines.
| EV-Derived miRNAs | K562 Mean Ct (SD) | KG1 Mean Ct (SD) | HL60 Mean Ct (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| hsa-miR-145 | 28.547 (1.034) | 29.522 (1.064) | 29.522 (1.064) |
| hsa-miR-484 | 27.792 (0.812) | 28.481 (1.114) | 28.481 (1.114) |
| hsa-miR-29a | 28.463 (1.235) | 27.747 (0.848) | 27.747 (0.848) |
| hsa-miR-25 | 27.750 (1.350) | 27.739 (0.707) | 27.739 (0.707) |
| hsa-miR-425-5p | 29.410 (1.167) | 27.454 (1.213) | 27.454 (1.213) |
| hsa-miR-186 | 27.534 (1.156) | 26.930 (1.056) | 26.930 (1.056) |
| hsa-miR-532 | 29.952 (1.000) | 26.685 (0.619) | 26.685 (0.619) |
| hsa-miR-210 | 26.659 (1.228) | 26.656 (0.,904) | 26.656 (0.904) |
| hsa-miR-27a | 29.696 (1.184) | 26.572 (0.798) | 26.572 (0.798) |
| hsa-miR-320 | 25.836 (0.844) | 26.540 (1.093) | 26.540 (1.093) |
| hsa-miR-15b | 28.530 (1.134) | 25.739 (0.715) | 25.739 (0.715) |
| hsa-miR-494 | 26.762 (1.276) | 25.598 (1.387) | 25.598 (1.387) |
| hsa-let-7e | 29.536 (1.014) | 25.354 (0.876) | 25.354 (0.876) |
| hsa-miR-19a | 29.703 (1.226) | 24.629 (0.756) | 24.629 (0.756) |
| hsa-miR-483-5p | 26.502 (1.077) | 24.592 (0.913) | 24.592 (0.913) |
| hsa-miR-20b | 28.791 (0.746) | 23.807 (0.999) | 23.807 (0.999) |
| hsa-miR-30c | 24.754 (0.762) | 23.778 (0.975) | 23.778 (0.975) |
| hsa-miR-21 | 27.538 (1.215) | 23.750 (1.082) | 23.750 (1.082) |
| hsa-miR-16 | 26.564 (1.331) | 23.693 (0.867) | 23.693 (0.867) |
| hsa-miR-30b | 26.688 (0.844) | 23.656 (0.811) | 23.656 (0.811) |
| hsa-miR-92a | 24.688 (1.311) | 23.539 (1.175) | 23.539 (1.175) |
| hsa-miR-221 | 29.812 (1.008) | 23.398 (1.106) | 23.398 (1.106) |
| hsa-miR-146b | 21.782 (1.058) | 22.850 (1.152) | 22.850 (1.152) |
| hsa-miR-142-3p | 28.549 (1.094) | 22.804 (0.799) | 22.804 (0.799) |
| hsa-miR-191 | 22.488 (0.917) | 22.626 (1.328) | 22.626 (1.328) |
| hsa-miR-342-3p | 24.720 (0.773) | 22.442 (1.177) | 22.442 (1.177) |
| hsa-miR-222 | 27.684 (0.892) | 21.850 (1.156) | 21.850 (1.156) |
| hsa-miR-24 | 26.898 (1.107) | 21.815 (1.257) | 21.815 (1.257) |
| hsa-miR-20a | 24.698 (0.668) | 21.463 (1.113) | 21.463 (1.113) |
| hsa-miR-17 | 23.745 (1.036) | 19.910 (1.037) | 19.910 (1.037) |
| hsa-miR-106a | 23.721 (0.986) | 19.773 (0.746) | 19.773 (0.746) |
| hsa-miR-223 | 20.705 (0.886) | 18.706 (1.167) | 18.706 (1.167) |
| hsa-miR-19b | 23.768 (1.284) | 18.478 (0.980) | 18.478 (0.980) |
Figure 3Relative expression level of miR-21 in bone marrow. (A) Bone marrow-circulating miR-21 expression in AML patients (n = 16) compared to HDs (n = 9). (B) MiR-21 is upregulated in AML patient T lymphocytes (n = 19) compared to HD lymphocytes (n = 9). Data obtained by quantitative RT-PCR amplification of miR-21 are plotted. All data were collected and statistically analyzed using Student’s t-test. Values are presented as the means of at least three independent experiments. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.01 (**) for BM-circulating AMLD vs HD and p ≤ 0.05 (*) for BM CD3 AML vs HD.
Figure 4miR-21 induces cell death in T lymphocytes. (A) T cell lentivirus transduction efficiency: analysis using cytometry of the percentage of transduced human T lymphocytes (=3) by lentiviral vectors containing GFP and hsa-miR-21 or scramble as a control (=3). (B) Relative expression of miR-21 in lenti-miR-21-transduced cells (=3) compared to the control (=3). (C) MiR-21 induces HD T lymphocyte cell death. (D) Inhibition of miR-21 expression increases resistance to cell death in T lymphocytes (=3). All data were collected and statistically analyzed using Student’s t-test. Values are presented as the means of at least three independent experiments. The levels of statistical significance were set at p ≤ 0.03 and p < 0.01.
Figure 5Gene expression analysis of cell death pathways induced by miR-21 (A–E). Analysis of the gene expression of cell death pathways in lenti-miR-21-transduced T lymphocytes (=3) compared to lenti-scramble-transduced T lymphocytes (=3). Relative expression of upregulated proapoptotic (A), antiapoptotic (B), autophagy (C), necrosis (D), and downregulated genes (E). All data were collected and statistically analyzed using Student’s t-test. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Figure 6miR-21 induces a protumoral response in T lymphocytes. (A–C) Analysis of the expression of immune response genes in lenti-miR-21-transduced T lymphocytes (=3) compared to lenti-scramble-transduced T lymphocytes (=3). Relative expression of common genes related to T regulatory and immunosuppressive markers (A), Th2 immune genes (B) and genes related to the protumoral immune response (C). (D) Relative expression of genes related to the protumoral response in AML T lymphocytes (=27) compared to HD lymphocytes (=11). All data were collected and statistically analyzed using Student’s t-test. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.