Literature DB >> 32910422

Direct anterior approach versus direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty and bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: a retrospective comparative study.

Mauro Spina1, Valentina Luppi2, Jacopo Chiappi2, Francesco Bagnis2, Massimo Balsano3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the current literature, there is no consensus on the best surgical approach in hip replacement for femoral neck fractures (FNFs). AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the direct lateral approach (DLA) in patients treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for FNFs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with displaced FNFs (Garden type III and IV) treated operatively using BHA and THA were enrolled. The surgical approach techniques DAA and DLA are compared. The analysed variables are: mean surgery time, number of blood units transfused perioperatively, percentage of patients transfused, perioperative complications, pain and functional outcomes at 1 and 6 months and mortality at 1, 3 and 12 months.
RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2017, 37 patients underwent BHA by the DAA and 38 patients underwent BHA by the DLA, 69 patients underwent THA by the DAA and 60 patients underwent THA by the DLA. For THA, the DAA compared to the DLA had a higher mean surgery time (100.8 min vs. 97.7 min), a lower mean number of blood units transfused perioperatively (1.4 U vs. 1.9 U), a significantly lower percentage of patients transfused (53.6% vs. 71.7%), a higher rate of perioperative complications (10.1% vs. 1.6%), a lower pain referred and better functional outcomes in the first 6 postoperative months and a significantly lower mortality rate at 12 months (2.9% vs. 16.7%). For BHA, the advantages of the DAA over DLA are not as significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The direct anterior approach in THA for FNFs provides significant benefits in the early post-operative period compared to the direct lateral approach in terms of functional recovery, residual pain, blood loss and mortality rate in the elderly active population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipolar hemiarthroplasty; Direct anterior approach; Direct lateral approach; Hip fractures; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32910422     DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01696-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  1 in total

1.  [Incidence and socioeconomic burden of hip fractures in Italy].

Authors:  M Rossini; P Piscitelli; F Fitto; P Camboa; A Angeli; G Guida; S Adami
Journal:  Reumatismo       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun
  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Minimal-invasive anterior approach to the hip provides a better surgery-related and early postoperative functional outcome than conventional lateral approach after hip hemiarthroplasty following femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  M Orth; D Osche; P Mörsdorf; J H Holstein; M F Rollmann; T Fritz; T Pohlemann; A Pizanis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Direct Anterior versus Lateral Approach for Femoral Neck Fracture: Role in COVID-19 Disease.

Authors:  Giuseppe Maccagnano; Francesco Maruccia; Michela Rauseo; Giovanni Noia; Michele Coviello; Andrea Laneve; Alessandro Pio Quitadamo; Giacomo Trivellin; Michele Malavolta; Vito Pesce
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  The Feasibility of Using the Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty or Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty to Treat Femoral Neck Fractures among the Elderly.

Authors:  Shigeo Ishiguro; Kunihiro Asanuma; Tomohito Hagi; Hidehiko Ohsumi; Hiroki Wakabayashi; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2022-07-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.