M Orth1, D Osche2, P Mörsdorf2, J H Holstein2,3, M F Rollmann2,4, T Fritz2, T Pohlemann2, A Pizanis2. 1. Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Saarland Univesity, Kirrberger Strasse 1, D-66421, Homburg, Saarland, Germany. marcel.orth@uks.eu. 2. Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Saarland Univesity, Kirrberger Strasse 1, D-66421, Homburg, Saarland, Germany. 3. Ethianum Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. BG Klinik Tuebingen on behalf of the Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are one of the most frequent fractures among elderly patients and commonly require surgical treatment. Bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (BHHA) is mostly performed in these cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present retrospective study geriatric patients with FNF (n = 100) treated either by anterior minimal-invasive surgery (AMIS; n = 50) or lateral conventional surgery (LCS; n = 50) were characterized (age at the time of surgery, sex, health status/ASA score, walking distance and need for walking aids before the injury) and intraoperative parameters (duration of surgery, blood loss, complications), as well as postoperative functional performance early (duration of in-patient stay, radiological leg length discrepancy, ability to full weight-bearing, mobilization with walking aids) and 12 months (radiological signs of sintering, clinical parameters, complication rate) after surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients in the AMIS group demonstrated a reduced blood loss intraoperatively, while the duration of surgery and complication rates did not differ between the two groups. Further, more patients in the AMIS group achieved full weight-bearing of the injured leg and were able to walk with a rollator or less support during their in-patient stay. Of interest, patients in the AMIS group achieved this level of mobility earlier than those of the LCS group, although their walking distance before the acute injury was reduced. Moreover, patients of the AMIS group showed equal leg lengths postoperatively more often than patients of the LCS group. No significant differences in functional and surgery-related performance could be observed between AMIS and LCS group at 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, geriatric patients treated by AMIS experience less surgery-related strain and recover faster in the early postoperative phase compared to LCS after displaced FNF. Hence, AMIS should be recommended for BHHA in these vulnerable patients.
INTRODUCTION: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are one of the most frequent fractures among elderly patients and commonly require surgical treatment. Bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (BHHA) is mostly performed in these cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present retrospective study geriatric patients with FNF (n = 100) treated either by anterior minimal-invasive surgery (AMIS; n = 50) or lateral conventional surgery (LCS; n = 50) were characterized (age at the time of surgery, sex, health status/ASA score, walking distance and need for walking aids before the injury) and intraoperative parameters (duration of surgery, blood loss, complications), as well as postoperative functional performance early (duration of in-patient stay, radiological leg length discrepancy, ability to full weight-bearing, mobilization with walking aids) and 12 months (radiological signs of sintering, clinical parameters, complication rate) after surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients in the AMIS group demonstrated a reduced blood loss intraoperatively, while the duration of surgery and complication rates did not differ between the two groups. Further, more patients in the AMIS group achieved full weight-bearing of the injured leg and were able to walk with a rollator or less support during their in-patient stay. Of interest, patients in the AMIS group achieved this level of mobility earlier than those of the LCS group, although their walking distance before the acute injury was reduced. Moreover, patients of the AMIS group showed equal leg lengths postoperatively more often than patients of the LCS group. No significant differences in functional and surgery-related performance could be observed between AMIS and LCS group at 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, geriatric patients treated by AMIS experience less surgery-related strain and recover faster in the early postoperative phase compared to LCS after displaced FNF. Hence, AMIS should be recommended for BHHA in these vulnerable patients.
Authors: Vasanth Sathiyakumar; Sarah E Greenberg; Cesar S Molina; Rachel V Thakore; William T Obremskey; Manish K Sethi Journal: Injury Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 2.586