Literature DB >> 32910189

Use of n-alkanes to estimate feed intake in ruminants: a meta-analysis.

Jose Herilalao Andriarimalala1, Jose Carlos B Dubeux2, Nicolas DiLorenzo2, David Mirabedini Jaramillo2, Jean de Neupomuscène Rakotozandriny1, Paulo Salgado3,4.   

Abstract

Precise techniques to estimate feed intake by ruminants are critical to enhance feed efficiency and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient losses to the environment. Using a meta-analysis, we evaluated the accuracy of the n-alkane technique to predict feed intake in cattle and sheep and assessed the relationships between feed intake and fecal recovery (FR) of n-alkanes. The database was composed of 28 studies, including 129 treatments (87 and 42 for cattle and sheep, respectively) and 402 animals (232 cattle and 170 sheep) fed at troughs, from published studies. Relationships between observed (in vivo measurement) and predicted feed intake by C31:C32 and C32:C33 n-alkane pairs were evaluated by regression. Meta-regression addressed the relationships between the difference in FR of n-alkane pairs and the error in intake estimation, as well as the amount and duration of C32 n-alkane dosing. Regression of observed intake on n-alkane-based estimates revealed good relationships in cattle (adjusted R2 = 0.99 for C31:C32, and adjusted R2 = 0.98 for C32:C33; P < 0.0001) and in sheep (adjusted R2 = 0.94 for C31:C32, and adjusted R2 = 0.96 for C32:C33; P < 0.0001). FR of natural n-alkanes showed a coefficient of variation of about 15% and 16% for C31 and C33, respectively, in cattle. In sheep, the coefficient of variation was 8% and 14% for C31 and C33, respectively. The relationships between the difference of FR of n-alkane pairs and the error in feed intake estimation in cattle were characterized by an adjusted R2 = 0.83 for C31:C32 (P < 0.0001) and adjusted R2 = 0.93 for C32:C33 (P < 0.0001). In sheep, they were characterized by an adjusted R2 = 0.69 for C31:C32 (P < 0.001) and adjusted R2 = 0.76 for C32:C33 (P < 0.001). The n-alkane technique provided the reliability for estimating feed intake in cattle and sheep in barn experiments. The present meta-analysis demonstrated that without correction for differences in FR of n-alkane pairs, deviation in feed intake prediction would occur. However, further research is necessary to determine the relationship between the n-alkane dosing procedure (daily amount and duration of dosing) and FR of n-alkane.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cattle; feed intake; markers; recovery; sheep

Year:  2020        PMID: 32910189      PMCID: PMC7751197          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

Review 1.  Invited review: Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology.

Authors:  N R St-Pierre
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Using the alkanes and long-chain alcohols of plant cuticular wax to estimate diet composition and the intakes of mixed forages in sheep consuming a known amount of alkane-labelled supplement.

Authors:  H Dove; E Charmley
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Faecal alkane recoveries from multi-component diets and effects on estimates of diet composition in sheep.

Authors:  C Elwert; H Dove; M Rodehutscord
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  N-alkanes v. ytterbium/faecal index as two methods for estimating herbage intake of dairy cows fed on diets differing in the herbage: maize silage ratio and feeding level.

Authors:  E Pérez-Ramírez; J L Peyraud; R Delagarde
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does body size of dairy cows, at constant ratio of maintenance to production requirements, affect productivity in a pasture-based production system?

Authors:  P Hofstetter; M Steiger Burgos; R Petermann; A Münger; J W Blum; P Thomet; H Menzi; S Kohler; P Kunz
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 2.130

6.  Comparison of techniques for estimating herbage intake of grazing dairy cows.

Authors:  H J Smit; H Z Taweel; B M Tas; S Tamminga; A Elgersma
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 7.  Effects of dietary fat on fertility of dairy cattle: A meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  R M Rodney; P Celi; W Scott; K Breinhild; I J Lean
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  A meta-analysis of the impact of monensin in lactating dairy cattle. Part 2. Production effects.

Authors:  T F Duffield; A R Rabiee; I J Lean
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 9.  Plant wax components: a new approach to estimating intake and diet composition in herbivores.

Authors:  H Dove; R W Mayes
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 10.  Nutritional significance and metabolism of very long chain fatty alcohols and acids from dietary waxes.

Authors:  James L Hargrove; Phillip Greenspan; Diane K Hartle
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2004-03
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy Analysis to Predict Diet Composition of a Mountain Ungulate Species.

Authors:  Laia Jarque-Bascuñana; Jordi Bartolomé; Emmanuel Serrano; Johan Espunyes; Mathieu Garel; Juan Antonio Calleja Alarcón; Jorge Ramón López-Olvera; Elena Albanell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.