| Literature DB >> 32908462 |
Sumrit Mopoung1, Vijitr Udeye1, Supaluck Viruhpintu2, Nonglak Yimtragool2, Visarut Unhong1.
Abstract
Rice husk biochars were prepared by carbonization at 400-600°C. The products were analyzed by FTIR, SEM-EDS, BET, and approximate analysis in order to find final products with the best properties and the lowest carbonization temperature. It has been found that the biochar prepared at 500°C, which has 37.86 ± 0.11% yield, 341.0776 m2/g of BET surface area, and 0.136639 cm3/g of micropore volume, is suitable for use as a root supplement in the aquaponic system. The aquaponic systems consist of aquaculture and a hydroponic system with and without biochar supplement. The control experiment consists of an aquaculture and planting panel with biochar supplement disconnected from each other. Tilapia and Chinese morning glory were used for growth studies. The water quality from all aquaculture ponds has also been analyzed at an interval of 10 days for 47 days. The results showed that the growth rates of Tilapia and Chinese morning glory in the aquaponic system with biochar were clearly higher than in the control experiment, which is in accordance with the water quality in each aquaculture pond. However, the growth rates of Tilapia (23.5 g/body vs. 22.7 g/body) and morning glory (3.907 g/stem vs. 2.609 g/stem) in supplemented biochar system tend to be higher than the nonsupplemented biochar system. It has been shown that rice husk biochar can help in treating water in the aquaponic system by increasing the amount of dissolved oxygen in the aquaculture water and conversion of toxic compounds to those beneficial for plant growth.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32908462 PMCID: PMC7474792 DOI: 10.1155/2020/7901362
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1(a) Aquatic pond, (b) the first crop panel, (c) the second crop panel, and (d) the third crop panel.
Proximate analysis and % yield of rice husk and rice husk biochar products.
| Sample | Proximate analysis | % yield | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % moisture content | % volatile matter | % fixed carbon | % ash | ||
| Rice husk | 10.08 ± 0.62 | 69.98 ± 2.85 | 9.85 ± 0.68 | 10.08 ± 0.27 | — |
| Rice husk biochar prepared at 400°C | 2.83 ± 0.31 | 20.13 ± 1.32 | 56.75 ± 0.54 | 20.29 ± 0.43 | 43.23 ± 0.10 |
| Rice husk biochar prepared at 500°C | 2.81 ± 0.57 | 7.36 ± 0.72 | 68.64 ± 2.32 | 21.19 ± 0.36 | 37.86 ± 0.11 |
| Rice husk biochar prepared at 600°C | 2.61 ± 0.52 | 5.85 ± 0.75 | 69.46 ± 2.74 | 22.08 ± 0.31 | 37.41 ± 0.38 |
Figure 2FTIR transmission spectra of (a) rice husk, (b) rice husk biochar at 400°C, (c) rice husk biochar at 500°C, and (d) rice husk biochar at 600°C.
Figure 3SEM images of (a) rice husk biochar prepared at 400°C, (b) rice husk biochar prepared at 500°C, (c) rice husk biochar prepared at 600°C, and (d) rice husk biochar prepared at 500°C after being used as supplemented plant root for 47 days.
Elemental composition of rice husk biochar from EDS.
| Samples of biochar prepared at | Elements composition (%wt) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | O | Si | K | P | Ca | |
| 400°C | 74.62 | 22.02 | 2.94 | 0.42 | — | — |
| 500°C | 77.44 | 16.54 | 5.39 | 0.63 | — | — |
| 600°C | 78.41 | 13.71 | 6.95 | 0.92 | — | — |
| After use | 62.20 | 18.90 | 16.92 | — | 1.11 | 0.86 |
Surface area and porosity of rice husk biochar by BET.
| Samples of biochar prepared at | BET surface area (m2/g) | Micropore volume (cm3/g) | Surface area of pores between 17 Å and 3,000 Å (m2/g) | volume of pores between 17 Å and 3,000 Å (cm3/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 400°C | 7.6311 | 0.000278 | 2.2491 | 0.006805 |
| 500°C | 341.0776 | 0.136639 | 23.0061 | 0.024664 |
| 600°C | 414.5242 | 0.149359 | 31.7760 | 0.025080 |
Total solids, suspended solids, nitrite, orthophosphate, dissolved oxygen, and pH of water in aquatic ponds and hydroponic system.
| Pond number | Total solids (mg/L) | Suspended solids (mg/L) | Nitrite (mg/L) | Orthophosphate (mg/L) | Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7th day | ||||||
| 1 | 162 | 94 | 1.2083 | 0.2347 | 5.34 | 6.542 |
| 2 | 150 | 80 | 0.9439 | 0.2234 | 6.35 | 6.568 |
| 3 | 132 | 54 | 0.1613 | 0.1435 | 6.41 | 6.983 |
|
| ||||||
| 17th day | ||||||
| 1 | 204 | 172 | 2.1611 | 0.3253 | 5.73 | 6.573 |
| 2 | 83 | 96 | 1.1123 | 0.2023 | 6.65 | 6.751 |
| 3 | 56 | 43 | 0.1216 | 0.1364 | 7.34 | 7.163 |
|
| ||||||
| 27th day | ||||||
| 1 | 290 | 228 | 3.6583 | 0.3425 | 5.54 | 6.625 |
| 2 | 72 | 64 | 2.8732 | 0.1958 | 6.52 | 6.356 |
| 3 | 42 | 34 | 0.1486 | 0.1743 | 7.31 | 6.923 |
|
| ||||||
| 37th day | ||||||
| 1 | 328 | 280 | 3.0708 | 0.4173 | 5.38 | 6.831 |
| 2 | 60 | 47 | 1.6521 | 0.2042 | 6.75 | 6.259 |
| 3 | 36 | 25 | 0.1209 | 0.1725 | 6.40 | 7.038 |
|
| ||||||
| 47th day | ||||||
| 1 | 373 | 302 | 3.1937 | 0.4264 | 5.30 | 6.878 |
| 2 | 43 | 32 | 1.6190 | 0.2273 | 6.78 | 7.078 |
| 3 | 35 | 28 | 0.1641 | 0.1755 | 7.40 | 7.048 |
Pond number 1 = aquatic pond, pond number 2 = aquatic pond connect to hydroponic system without rice husk biochar, and pond number 3 = aquatic pond connect to planting panel with rice husk biochar.
The results of the growth measurement of the morning glory after 47 days.
| Crop panel number | Stem height (cm) | Number of leaves (stem) | Fresh stem weight (g/stem) | Fresh root weight (g/stem) | Dried stem weight (g/stem) | Dried root weight (g/stem) | Trunk diameter (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.34 | 6.6 | 1.000 | 0.542 | 0.1402 | 0.0560 | 0.25 |
| 2 | 23.65 | 8.9 | 2.609 | 1.899 | 0.3710 | 0.1390 | 0.48 |
| 3 | 23.77 | 9.7 | 3.907 | 1.418 | 0.3872 | 0.1130 | 0.47 |
Figure 4Graph showing the growth of fish by the time in (a) pond number 1, (b) pond number 2, and (c) pond number 3.