| Literature DB >> 32908165 |
Arnaud Kengmo Tchoupa1, Kate E Watkins1, Rebekah A Jones1, Agnès Kuroki2, Mohammad Tauqeer Alam1, Sebastien Perrier1,2,3, Yin Chen4, Meera Unnikrishnan5.
Abstract
The Staphylococcus aureus type VII secretion system (T7SS) exports several proteins that are pivotal for bacterial virulence. The mechanisms underlying T7SS-mediated staphylococcal survival during infection nevertheless remain unclear. Here we report that S. aureus lacking T7SS components are more susceptible to host-derived antimicrobial fatty acids. Unsaturated fatty acids such as linoleic acid (LA) elicited an increased inhibition of S. aureus mutants lacking T7SS effectors EsxC, EsxA and EsxB, or the membrane-bound ATPase EssC, compared to the wild-type (WT). T7SS mutants generated in different S. aureus strain backgrounds also displayed an increased sensitivity to LA. Analysis of bacterial membrane lipid profiles revealed that the esxC mutant was less able to incorporate LA into its membrane phospholipids. Although the ability to bind labelled LA did not differ between the WT and mutant strains, LA induced more cell membrane damage in the T7SS mutants compared to the WT. Furthermore, proteomic analyses of WT and mutant cell fractions revealed that, in addition to compromising membranes, T7SS defects induce oxidative stress and hamper their response to LA challenge. Thus, our findings indicate that T7SS contribute to maintaining S. aureus membrane integrity and homeostasis when bacteria encounter antimicrobial fatty acids.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32908165 PMCID: PMC7481793 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71653-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Enhanced S. aureus growth inhibition by antimicrobial fatty acids in esxC and essC mutants. (A) S. aureus WT USA300, ΔessC, and ΔesxC were grown in TSB or TSB supplemented with 80 µM linoleic (LA). Means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) are shown. n = 4. (B) The area under the curve (AUC) of biological replicates grown in TSB + LA in (A) were calculated and presented as % relative to the WT. Means ± SEM are shown. *Indicates P < 0.05 using a Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons test. (C) After 14 h growth in TSB or TSB supplemented with 80 µM LA or stearic acid (SA), bacteria were serially diluted, and CFU were determined. Mean values are presented, and the error bars represent SEM. n = 3, **indicates P < 0.01 using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test. (D) USA300 WT with the empty pOS1 plasmid (WT pOS1) and USA300 JE2 esxC mutant with either pOS1 (ΔesxC pOS1) or pOS1-esxC (ΔesxC pOS1-esxC) were grown in TSB or TSB + 80 µM LA as described in (A) followed by CFU estimation. Mean values are shown; error bars represent SEM. n = 5, **indicates P < 0.01 using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test. (E) S. aureus WT USA300, ΔessC, and ΔesxC were grown in TSB or TSB supplemented with 80 µM arachidonic acid (AA). Means ± SEM are shown, n = 3. (F) AUCs of biological replicates grown in TSB + AA in (E) were calculated and presented as % relative to the WT. Means ± SEM are shown. *Indicates P < 0.05 using a Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons test.
Figure 2T7SS substrates contribute to resistance to linoleic acid toxicity. (A) S. aureus USA300 wild-type (WT) and USA300 esxA (ΔesxA) or esxB (ΔesxB) deletion mutants were grown in TSB or TSB supplemented with 80 µM linoleic acid (LA). (B) AUCs of biological replicates grown in TSB + LA as in (A) were calculated and presented as % relative to the WT. Means ± SEM are shown. n = 4. (C) S. aureus Newman WT and Newman esxA (ΔesxA) or esxB (ΔesxB) deletion mutants were grown in TSB or TSB + 40 µM LA. (D) AUCs of biological replicates grown in TSB + LA as in (C) were calculated and presented as % relative to the WT. Means ± SEM are shown. n = 4. (E) Growth curves as described in (A) were done with RN6390 wild-type (WT) and RN6390 essC (ΔessC) or esxC (ΔesxC) deletion mutants. (F) AUCs of biological replicates grown in TSB + LA as in (E) were calculated and presented as % relative to the WT. Means ± SEM are shown. n = 3. (G) Newman WT with the empty pOS1 plasmid (WT pOS1) and Newman esxA mutant with either pOS1 (ΔesxA pOS1) or pOS1-esxA (ΔesxA pesxA) were grown in TSB or TSB + 40 µM LA. Data shown in (A,C,E,G) are representative of at least three independent experiments. (H) AUCs of biological replicates grown in TSB + LA as in (G) were calculated and presented as % relative to the WT. Means ± SEM are shown. n = 4. In (B,D,F,H) *indicates P < 0.05 using a Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons test.
Figure 3T7SS mutants display increased membrane permeability upon LA binding. (A) Chemical structure of azide functionalised linoleic acid (azide-LA; N-diazo-N-((9Z,12Z)-octadeca-9,12-dienoyl)lysine, N3-LA). Highlighted in green is the azido lysine. (B) S. aureus USA300 WT, ΔessC, and ΔesxC were grown with shaking in TSB to OD600 of 1.0. Bacteria were then stained for 15 min with 10 µM azide-LA prior to labelling for 1 h with alkyne Alexa Fluor 488. Mean percentage of fluorescence values relative to WT (100%) are presented; error bars represent SD, n = 5. (C) Micrographs of bacteria grown in TSB and treated as described in (B) and additionally stained with propidium iodide (PI). (D) ImageJ was used to quantitate PI fluorescence of bacterial clusters from 12 different fields per strain. Each box‐and‐whisker plot depicts the minimal and maximal PI intensities, the median is the vertical bar inside the box, which is delimited by the lower and upper quartiles. **Indicates P < 0.01 using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test.
Figure 4T7SS mutants display increased PI staining when treated with LA. Live/Dead staining of S. aureus USA300 WT, ΔessC or ΔesxC mutants after growth to OD600 of 1.0, without (A) or with treatment with 80 µM (B) linoleic acid. Images are representative of 3 independent experiments. (C) The ratio of SYTO 9: PI fluorescence (live:dead cells) of 25 different fields per strain was quantitated with ImageJ. Means ± SD are shown, n = 3; ***Indicates P < 0.001, **Indicates P < 0.01 using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.
Figure 5The esxC mutant is less able to incorporate LA into its phospholipids. Representative HPLC chromatograms of native phosphatidylglycerol (PG) species of S. aureus USA300 JE2 WT (A) or ΔesxC (B) grown in TSB (top panel) or in TSB supplemented with 10 µM LA (bottom panel), in negative ionisation mode. Relative quantification of the indicated PG species containing an unsaturated FA in LA-treated WT, ΔessC and ΔesxC. The C18:2-containing PG species, C33:2 (C) and total unsaturated fatty acid (C18:2, C20:2 and C22:2) containing exogenous PG species (C33:2, C35:2 and C37:2) (D) are presented as ratios of total PG species. Mean values are shown; error bars represent SD. n = 3, *indicates P < 0.05 using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test.
Figure 6Quantitative proteomics shows altered cellular content and bacterial response to LA in T7SS mutants. S. aureus USA300 WT and mutants (ΔessC and ΔesxC) were grown in TSB or TSB supplemented with LA. (A) Venn diagram showing the number of proteins with altered abundance compared to WT specific to ΔessC (23) or ΔesxC (10), and common to ΔessC and ΔesxC (14). (B) The 14 proteins that are similarly changed in ΔessC and ΔesxC mutants are highlighted on a volcano plot. (C) Volcano plot showing the extensive change in the LA-treated WT compared to WT. (D) Venn diagram displaying the numbers of proteins with altered relative abundance upon LA challenge of WT (LA.WT), ΔessC (LA.dEssC) or ΔesxC (LA.dEsxC) compared to the respective untreated samples.
Proteins with changed abundance in ΔessC and ΔesxC mutants relative to the WT USA300 JE2.
| Functions | Uniprot ID | Δ | Δ | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log2 FC | Adjusted | Log2 FC | Adjusted | |||
| Signal transduction systems | Q2FK09 | − 3.0 | 4.90E−13 | − 3.1 | 4.90E−13 | Sensory transduction protein LytR |
| Q2FH23 | − 2.9 | 0.002527 | − 2.1 | 0.026184 | Response regulator ArlR | |
| Membrane proteins | A0A0H2XF42 | 3.0 | 1.75E−10 | 0 | 1 | Cytochrome D ubiquinol oxidase, subunit I |
| A0A0H2XDZ5 | 1.7 | 1.68E−05 | 0 | 1 | Uncharacterized membrane protein | |
| A0A0H2XFJ8 | 2.0 | 0.001077 | 0.5 | 0.883953 | Uracil permease | |
| A0A0H2XGW7 | 2.7 | 0.005757 | 2.5 | 0.010784 | Putative lipoprotein | |
| A0A0H2XIA9 | 1.0 | 0.006115 | 0 | 1 | Protein translocase subunit SecY | |
| Q2FIN2 | 1.6 | 0.029451 | 0.5 | 0.970614 | Prolipoprotein diacylglyceryl transferase LGT | |
| A0A0H2XKD9 | 2.0 | 0.038093 | 1.8 | 0.070347 | Staphylococcal respiratory response protein SrrB | |
| A0A0H2XFE1 | 3.4 | 0.039814 | 1.1 | 0.970614 | Peptidase | |
| A0A0H2XJV8 | 2.0 | 0.04444 | 1.5 | 0.231285 | Cyclic-di-AMP phosphodiesterase | |
| A0A0H2XGF4 | 3.0 | 0.044681 | 0.9 | 0.986458 | Sodium:dicarboxylate symporter family protein | |
| A0A0H2XHV2 | 2.5 | 0.049168 | 2.4 | 0.070182 | Glycine betaine transporter OpuD | |
| Stress response | A0A0H2XKH6 | 2.2 | 5.80E−05 | 2.5 | 1.07E−05 | Universal stress protein family |
| A0A0H2XIZ0 | 0.0 | 1 | − 3.4 | 1. 06E−10 | OsmC/Ohr family protein | |
| DNA repair | Q2FHE2 | − 2.3 | 1.79E−08 | − 2.3 | 1.19E-08 | DNA mismatch repair protein MutL |
| A0A0H2XI63 | − 2.0 | 0.004036 | − 2.0 | 0.004036 | DNA repair protein RadA | |
| A0A0H2XHT1 | − 0.3 | 0.708343 | − 1.9 | 0.008379 | Formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase MutM | |
| Oxidation–reduction process | A0A0H2XJ90 | 1.1 | 0.038093 | 1.0 | 0.088334 | D-isomer specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family protein |
| A0A0H2XHE0 | 2.4 | 0.039099 | − 0.1 | 1 | Thiol-disulphide oxidoreductase, DCC family protein | |
| A0A0H2XGR9 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.4 | 8.89E-08 | Oxidoreductase, Gfo/Idh/MocA family | |
| A0A0H2XK08 | 1.0 | 0.406975 | 2.9 | 0.00791 | Oxidoreductase, short chain dehydrogenase/reductase family | |
| A0A0H2XFZ3 | − 0.8 | 0.404225 | 2.1 | 0.016405 | Nitroreductase family protein | |
| Hydrolases | A0A0H2XE49 | 2.9 | 1.07E−06 | 2.9 | 5.99E−07 | Amidohydrolase |
| Q2FES9 | − 2.7 | 0.003385 | − 0.3 | 1 | Uncharacterized hydrolase | |
| A0A0H2XFF2 | − 0.8 | 0.016697 | − 0.5 | 0.157809 | Peptidase, U32 family | |
| A0A0H2XJH8 | 0.0 | 1 | 2.8 | 1.06E−10 | Peptidase M20 domain-containing protein 2 | |
| A0A0H2XJ54 | 0.0 | 1 | 2.0 | 0.000949 | Hydrolase (HAD superfamily) | |
| Q2FEG2 | − 0.2 | 0.854748 | − 2.9 | 0.004615 | Formimidoylglutamase | |
| Metabolism | A0A0H2XGU2 | − 1.6 | 4.99E−06 | − 0.1 | 1 | Pseudouridine synthase |
| A0A0H2XK15 | 2.8 | 0.004424 | 0.9 | 0.777138 | 1-phosphatidylinositol phosphodiesterase | |
| Q2FEK2 | − 1.6 | 0.038093 | − 0.3 | 1 | Urease accessory protein UreE | |
| Q2FI05 | 1.1 | 0.038093 | 0.0 | 1 | Bifunctional purine biosynthesis protein PurH | |
| Q2FIL2 | 2.9 | 0.038093 | 0.8 | 0.970614 | SsrA-binding protein | |
| A0A0H2XII6 | 1.8 | 0.038093 | 1.5 | 0.088334 | Orn/Lys/Arg decarboxylase | |
| A0A0H2XJR8 | − 0.9 | 0.04444 | − 0.5 | 0.61246 | RNA methyltransferase, RsmD family | |
| A0A0H2XKG7 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.4 | 8.18E−08 | Aspartokinase | |
| Cell wall composition | A0A0H2XJQ4 | − 4.0 | 4.92E−11 | − 4.0 | 3.28E−11 | Acetyltransferase, GNAT family |
| A0A0H2XKG3 | − 2.3 | 0.001238 | − 1.7 | 0.016405 | Fibronectin binding protein B | |
| A0A0H2XJC8 | − 2.3 | 0.009779 | − 3.0 | 0.000819 | Phi77 ORF017-like protein (Toxin MazF) | |
| Q2FE03 | 0.0 | 1 | 2.6 | 1.18E−12 | Fibronectin-binding protein A | |
| Nucleotide binding | A0A0H2XHY5 | − 2.3 | 8.58E−06 | − 2.3 | 6.01E−06 | ATP-grasp domain protein |
| A0A0H2XFA5 | 3.3 | 0.014259 | 3.5 | 0.008379 | Putative GTP-binding YqeH protein | |
| Uncharacterised proteins | A0A0H2XGJ8 | 2.2 | 0.000372 | 2.4 | 9.41E−05 | Uncharacterized protein |
| A0A0H2XE09 | 2.1 | 0.008231 | 1.9 | 0.016405 | Ybbr-like uncharacterized protein | |
| Q2FFI4 | 3.4 | 0.020136 | 0.9 | 0.970614 | UPF0316 membrane protein | |
| A0A0H2XG24 | 1.1 | 0.022345 | 0.8 | 0.088334 | Uncharacterized protein | |
Figure 7An altered oxidoreductive response in T7SS mutants in response to LA. Heatmaps depicting the P values of enriched (A) or diminished (B) molecular functions following a gene set analysis based on GO (gene ontology) annotations. Molecular functions that are changed in at least one strain (P < 0.05) following growth in presence of LA are shown. The shades of blue (A) or red (B) correspond to – log10 (P value). ROS levels were measured in cultures of S. aureus USA300 JE2 WT, ΔessC or ΔesxC grown to OD600 of 1.0 treated (C) with or without LA (D) using DCF reagent. Means ± SD are shown N = 5. *Indicates P < 0.05, **indicates P < 0.01, ***indicates P < 0.001 using the Kruskal–Wallis rank test.