| Literature DB >> 32906783 |
Hui Zhang1,2, Pengcheng Nie1,2,3, Zhengyan Xia4, Xuping Feng1,2, Xiaoxi Liu1,2, Yong He1,2.
Abstract
With the increase in demand, artificially planting Chinese medicinal materials (CHMs) has also increased, and the ensuing pesticide residue problems have attracted more and more attention. An optimized quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) method with multi-walledEntities:
Keywords: Chinese herbal medicines; pesticide residues; prediction models; pretreatment method; surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32906783 PMCID: PMC7570915 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25184081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Raman peak assignment of deltamethrin. (A) molecular structure of deltamethrin; (B) Comparison of Raman spectrum simulated by density functional theory (DFT), Raman spectrum of deltamethrin solid and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) spectrum of 10 mg/L deltamethrin acetonitrile solution; (C) SERS spectra of acetonitrile, extract of no-treatment Corydalis and extract of 7.5 mg/L deltamethrin-containing Corydalis.
Figure 2Selection of Raman characteristic peaks for detection of deltamethrin in Corydalis. (A) Raman spectrum of AuNPs colloid; (B) Raman spectrum of AuNPs with NaCl; (C) SERS of deltamethrin acetonitrile solution; (D) SERS of Corydalis extract; (E) SERS of Corydalis extract with 7.5 mg/L deltamethrin.
Figure 3Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) substrate characterization and comparison. (A): SERS of purified extracts using Opto Trace Raman 202 (OTR202) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as substrates; (B,C): peak intensity of two substrates at 999 cm−1 and 559 cm−1, respectively; (D,E): TEM of OTR202 and synthetic AuNPs, respectively; (F): UV-vis absorption spectrum of two substrates.
Figure 4Comparison of water removal methods. (A) SERS spectra characters after removing water method by adding with sodium chloride, anhydrous sodium acetate and anhydrous magnesium sulfate. (B) peak intensity of 559 cm−1 under different water removal modes; (C) peak intensity of 999 cm−1 under different water removal modes.
Figure 5The choice of purification conditions. (A) SERS of extracts purified by primary secondary amine (PSA), C18, graphitized carbon black (GCB) and anhydrous MgSO4; (B) SERS of extracts purified by Fe3O4 with a particle size of 100 nm; (C) SERS of extracts purified by multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs); (D) peak intensity after purification by different amount of MWCNTs at 999 cm−1 and 559 cm−1.
Figure 6Raman spectra of different levels of deltamethrin added to Corydalis. (A) SERS of deltamethrin concentration adding in Corydalis sample from 0 to 10 mg/L; (B) peak intensity of 559 cm−1 under different levels of deltamethrin; (C) peak intensity of 999 cm−1 under different levels of deltamethrin.
Figure 7Quantitative detection models of deltamethrin in Corydalis. Linear regression equation between peak intensity and deltamethrin content in Corydalis: (A) 559 cm−1; (B) 999 cm−1; (C) 559 cm−1 + 9 99 cm−1. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) model based on spectral data of characteristic peak bands and deltamethrin content: (D) 545~573 cm−1; (E) 987~1011 cm−1; (F) (545~573 cm−1) + (987~1011 cm−1).