Andressa Silva Alcântara1, Aline Donati1, Maria Victoria Suárez1, Ivan José Netto Pereira2, Neusa Yuriko Sakai Valente3, Nilceo Schwery Michalany4, Cristiano Luiz Horta de Lima5, Leticia Arsie Contin6. 1. Dermatologist at Dermatology Department, Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal, São Paulo, Brazil. 2. Plastic Surgeon at Dermatology Department, Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Pathologist at Dermatology Department, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Pathologist at Dermatology Department, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil. 5. Pathologist at Dermatology Department, Hospital Ipiranga, São Paulo, Brazil. 6. Dermatologist and coordinator at Hair Transplant Department, Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Insufficient hair growth after hair transplant, as well as erythema and perifollicular scaling, may be diagnosed as lichen planopilaris and treated as such based on clinical and histopathological findings. The purpose of this study is to observe graft biopsies of patients after uncomplicated hair transplants and to discuss if histological findings are enough to diagnose lichen planopilaris. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients diagnosed with androgenetic alopecia who were submitted to hair transplant were enrolled. In each of the participants, a scalp biopsy was performed in the receptor area and in the adjacent area. Biopsies were performed between 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Exams were analyzed by 3 pathologists. The t test was performed for paired observations, comparing the transplanted and the nontransplanted area for lymphocytic infiltrate and fibrosis. The significance level was considered as 5% (p < 0.05). Four of 8 participants had perifollicular lymphocytic infiltrate, from moderate to dense intensity in the recipient area. Fibrosis was seen in 6 patients. These findings were not seen in the control area. CONCLUSIONS: It is questioned whether lymphocytic infiltrate and fibrosis may be expected in patients who are submitted to normal hair transplants.
INTRODUCTION: Insufficient hair growth after hair transplant, as well as erythema and perifollicular scaling, may be diagnosed as lichen planopilaris and treated as such based on clinical and histopathological findings. The purpose of this study is to observe graft biopsies of patients after uncomplicated hair transplants and to discuss if histological findings are enough to diagnose lichen planopilaris. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients diagnosed with androgenetic alopecia who were submitted to hair transplant were enrolled. In each of the participants, a scalp biopsy was performed in the receptor area and in the adjacent area. Biopsies were performed between 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Exams were analyzed by 3 pathologists. The t test was performed for paired observations, comparing the transplanted and the nontransplanted area for lymphocytic infiltrate and fibrosis. The significance level was considered as 5% (p < 0.05). Four of 8 participants had perifollicular lymphocytic infiltrate, from moderate to dense intensity in the recipient area. Fibrosis was seen in 6 patients. These findings were not seen in the control area. CONCLUSIONS: It is questioned whether lymphocytic infiltrate and fibrosis may be expected in patients who are submitted to normal hair transplants.