Kyle M L Unsdorfer1, Julie Y An2, Larry A Binkovitz3. 1. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. binkovitz.larry@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients who underwent appendiceal US and received an equivocal interpretation had poorer clinical outcomes and higher medical costs compared to those to whom a definitive interpretation was given, either positive or negative. In an effort to reduce equivocal interpretations, we educated our group on the importance of increasing determinacy and encouraged the use of a reporting template with a definitive impression. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that educational sessions and implementation of an optional reporting template with only a definitive impression would reduce equivocal reporting and improve clinical outcomes without negatively impacting US diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients <18 years old at Mayo Clinic Rochester whose initial evaluation for acute appendicitis was a US in the 3-year period following educational sessions and template implementation. All studies were interpreted by board-certified fellowship-trained pediatric radiologists. We performed statistical analysis to compare the pre- and post-implementation cohorts. RESULTS: Following intervention, the rate of equivocal US interpretations was reduced from 23.7% to 9.3% (P<0.001). For studies with a definitive interpretation, measures of diagnostic performance of appendiceal US were similar for the pre- and post-implementation groups. US performance parameters were independent of appendiceal visualization. Follow-up CT utilization decreased from 18.7% to 8.9% (P<0.001). The negative laparotomy rate resulting from false-positive US interpretations remained low (6.8% vs. 5.0%, P=0.31). CONCLUSION: Following education sessions and implementation of an appendiceal US reporting template encouraging definitive reporting, equivocation was reduced, excellent diagnostic performance was maintained, follow-up CT utilization was reduced, and a low negative laparotomy rate was preserved.
BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients who underwent appendiceal US and received an equivocal interpretation had poorer clinical outcomes and higher medical costs compared to those to whom a definitive interpretation was given, either positive or negative. In an effort to reduce equivocal interpretations, we educated our group on the importance of increasing determinacy and encouraged the use of a reporting template with a definitive impression. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that educational sessions and implementation of an optional reporting template with only a definitive impression would reduce equivocal reporting and improve clinical outcomes without negatively impacting US diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients <18 years old at Mayo Clinic Rochester whose initial evaluation for acute appendicitis was a US in the 3-year period following educational sessions and template implementation. All studies were interpreted by board-certified fellowship-trained pediatric radiologists. We performed statistical analysis to compare the pre- and post-implementation cohorts. RESULTS: Following intervention, the rate of equivocal US interpretations was reduced from 23.7% to 9.3% (P<0.001). For studies with a definitive interpretation, measures of diagnostic performance of appendiceal US were similar for the pre- and post-implementation groups. US performance parameters were independent of appendiceal visualization. Follow-up CT utilization decreased from 18.7% to 8.9% (P<0.001). The negative laparotomy rate resulting from false-positive US interpretations remained low (6.8% vs. 5.0%, P=0.31). CONCLUSION: Following education sessions and implementation of an appendiceal US reporting template encouraging definitive reporting, equivocation was reduced, excellent diagnostic performance was maintained, follow-up CT utilization was reduced, and a low negative laparotomy rate was preserved.
Authors: Ramin Khorasani; David W Bates; Susan Teeger; Jeffrey M Rothschild; Douglas F Adams; Steven E Seltzer Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Andrew B Nordin; Stephen Sales; Jason W Nielsen; Brent Adler; David Gregory Bates; Brian Kenney Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Kristin N Partain; Adarsh U Patel; Curtis Travers; Heather L Short; Kiery Braithwaite; Jonathan Loewen; Kurt F Heiss; Mehul V Raval Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 2.545