Literature DB >> 32900927

CSF1R inhibition by a small-molecule inhibitor is not microglia specific; affecting hematopoiesis and the function of macrophages.

Fengyang Lei1, Naiwen Cui2, Chengxin Zhou1, James Chodosh1, Demetrios G Vavvas1, Eleftherios I Paschalis3.   

Abstract

Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibition has been proposed as a method for microglia depletion, with the assumption that it does not affect peripheral immune cells. Here, we show that CSF1R inhibition by PLX5622 indeed affects the myeloid and lymphoid compartments, causes long-term changes in bone marrow-derived macrophages by suppressing interleukin 1β, CD68, and phagocytosis but not CD208, following exposure to endotoxin, and also reduces the population of resident and interstitial macrophages of peritoneum, lung, and liver but not spleen. Thus, small-molecule CSF1R inhibition is not restricted to microglia, causing strong effects on circulating and tissue macrophages that perdure long after cessation of the treatment. Given that peripheral monocytes repopulate the central nervous system after CSF1R inhibition, these changes have practical implications for relevant experimental data.
Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNS; CSF1R; hematopoiesis; macrophages; microglia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32900927      PMCID: PMC7519218          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1922788117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibition has been proposed as specific for central nervous system (CNS) microglia depletion without significant effect on peripheral immune cells (1–4). This has been based on rather crude assays and indirect assessment of peripheral cell subtypes and function. Given that peripheral monocytes have been shown to participate in CNS disease via both infiltration and repopulation of neuroglia following microglia depletion (4–10), it is important to determine if CSF1R inhibition causes functional changes in peripheral immune cells that can become part of the CNS (3, 4, 10–14). Here we show that, contrary to the accepted notion (1, 11), PLX5622, a commonly used CSF1R inhibitor (8, 10, 11), does not affect only microglia but also leads to long-term changes in the myeloid and lymphoid compartments of the bone marrow, spleen, and blood by suppressing CCR2+ monocyte progenitor cells, CX3CR1+ bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs), CD117+ (C-KIT+) hematopoietic progenitor cells, F4/80+, MerTK+, and CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (Fig. 1 ). Most importantly, these cell populations either do not recover or rebound after cessation of CSF1R inhibition, with the exception of CD45+ CD11b+ cells which remain unaffected (Fig. 1 ). CSF1R inhibition also alters the lymphoid compartment of the bone marrow by suppressing T cells (CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+) and up-regulating CD19+ B cells (Fig. 1). Cessation of CSF1R inhibition causes rebound of some, but not all, lymphoid cells (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

CSF1R inhibition affects the myeloid and lymphoid compartments of the bone marrow, spleen, and blood. Flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow cells isolated from CCR2+/RFP::CX3CR1+/GFP mice treated with PLX5622 for 3 wk, at different time points after inhibitor treatment cessation. (A–F) CSF1R inhibition suppresses CCR2+, CX3CR1+, CD117+, and CD34+ cells. One week after cessation of inhibitor, only macrophages recover in number, although with a lower expression of CX3CR1. (G) CSF1R inhibition does not affect CD45+, CD11b+, or Ly6C+ bone marrow myeloid cell populations but does suppress CD11c+ dendritic cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, and CD115+, CD117+, and CD34+ hematopoietic subsets and up-regulates CD19+ B cells. Three weeks after cessation of CSF1R-inhibition, CX3CR1+, CCR2+, Ly6C+ CD3+, and CD8+ subpopulations rebound; Ly6G+ granulocytes, CD115+, and CD117+ cells remain suppressed; CD4+ T cells and CD34+ cells recover; and CD19+ B cells remain up-regulated. (H) Effects on spleen’s myeloid and lymphoid populations. Only CD19+ B cells remain unaffected. (I) CSF1R inhibition causes immediate suppression in the myeloid compartment and late suppression of the lymphoid compartment of the blood. n = 5 per group, mean ± SD, one-way analysis of variance with Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

CSF1R inhibition affects the myeloid and lymphoid compartments of the bone marrow, spleen, and blood. Flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow cells isolated from CCR2+/RFP::CX3CR1+/GFP mice treated with PLX5622 for 3 wk, at different time points after inhibitor treatment cessation. (A–F) CSF1R inhibition suppresses CCR2+, CX3CR1+, CD117+, and CD34+ cells. One week after cessation of inhibitor, only macrophages recover in number, although with a lower expression of CX3CR1. (G) CSF1R inhibition does not affect CD45+, CD11b+, or Ly6C+ bone marrow myeloid cell populations but does suppress CD11c+ dendritic cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, and CD115+, CD117+, and CD34+ hematopoietic subsets and up-regulates CD19+ B cells. Three weeks after cessation of CSF1R-inhibition, CX3CR1+, CCR2+, Ly6C+ CD3+, and CD8+ subpopulations rebound; Ly6G+ granulocytes, CD115+, and CD117+ cells remain suppressed; CD4+ T cells and CD34+ cells recover; and CD19+ B cells remain up-regulated. (H) Effects on spleen’s myeloid and lymphoid populations. Only CD19+ B cells remain unaffected. (I) CSF1R inhibition causes immediate suppression in the myeloid compartment and late suppression of the lymphoid compartment of the blood. n = 5 per group, mean ± SD, one-way analysis of variance with Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. In addition to the effects on bone marrow cells, CSF1R inhibition also suppresses splenic CX3CR1+ cells that persist for at least 3 wk after cessation of treatment (Fig. 1). Moreover, splenic CD3+ T cells (primarily CD8+) become suppressed, whereas CD19+ B cells are not affected (Fig. 1). Circulating CX3CR1+, CD115+, F4/80+, and MerTK+ blood cells are suppressed, but not the lymphoid CD3+ and CD4+ populations (Fig. 1). Cessation of CSF1R inhibitor causes rebounding of the CX3CR1+, F4/80+, and MerTK+ but not CD115+ blood cells and leads to delayed suppression of CD19+, CD3+, and CD4+ lymphoid cell in the circulation (Fig. 1). CSF1R inhibition also suppresses the proliferation of bone marrow and spleen macrophages (Fig. 2 ) and impairs the function of BMDMs for the long term. Three weeks after cessation of CSF1R inhibition, BMDMs display reduced interleukin (IL)-1β expression in response to endotoxin (Fig. 2 ), diminished phagocytosis (Fig. 2 ), reduced CD68 but not CD206 expression (Fig. 2 ), and suppressed CD115 labeling (Fig. 2 ). Moreover, CSF1R inhibition reduced the number of tissue-resident and interstitial macrophages of the lung (15, 16), liver (17), and peritoneum (18) and suppressed femur macrophages but did not affect CD45+ CD11b+ CD106+ spleen (19) and F4/80lo MHCII+ CSF1R+ CD11c+ peritoneum macrophage subsets (18) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.

CSF1R inhibition affects function and survival of resident and interstitial macrophages. (A–D) Ex vivo evaluation of the function of BMDMs from CX3CR1+/GFP mice 3 wk after cessation of CSF1R inhibitor. Macrophages from the bone marrow or spleen exhibit reduced proliferation 3 wk after cessation of CSF1R inhibition. (E–L) CSF1R inhibition suppresses IL-1β, CD68 expression, and phagocytosis of BMDMs following exposure to LPS but does not affect CD206 expression. (H) Schematic representation of the phagocytosis assay. (M and N) CSF1R inhibition causes long-term suppression of CD115 macrophage marker. (O) CSF1R-inhibitor reduces the number of resident and interstitial macrophages of the lung, liver, peritoneum, and femur but does not affect CD45+ CD11b+ CD106+ spleen and F4/80lo MHCII+ CSF1R+ CD11c+ peritoneal macrophages. n = 5 per group, mean ± SD, Independent t test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

CSF1R inhibition affects function and survival of resident and interstitial macrophages. (A–D) Ex vivo evaluation of the function of BMDMs from CX3CR1+/GFP mice 3 wk after cessation of CSF1R inhibitor. Macrophages from the bone marrow or spleen exhibit reduced proliferation 3 wk after cessation of CSF1R inhibition. (E–L) CSF1R inhibition suppresses IL-1β, CD68 expression, and phagocytosis of BMDMs following exposure to LPS but does not affect CD206 expression. (H) Schematic representation of the phagocytosis assay. (M and N) CSF1R inhibition causes long-term suppression of CD115 macrophage marker. (O) CSF1R-inhibitor reduces the number of resident and interstitial macrophages of the lung, liver, peritoneum, and femur but does not affect CD45+ CD11b+ CD106+ spleen and F4/80lo MHCII+ CSF1R+ CD11c+ peritoneal macrophages. n = 5 per group, mean ± SD, Independent t test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Previous studies have suggested that microglia depletion by CSF1R inhibition can either promote or exacerbate neurodegeneration (4, 10). These puzzling and contradictory results may not only be due to the differing role of microglia in various disease models but also to the varying relative contribution of peripheral and circulating macrophages on disease phenotype. Considering that BMDMs permanently engraft into diseased CNS tissue (8, 10), this work suggests that small-molecule inhibition is not restricted to microglia but additionally affects the turnover and function of bone marrow-derived, circulating, and tissue-resident macrophages. These effects perdure long after cessation of the treatment and have implications for the interpretation of relevant experimental data.

Materials and Methods

Mouse Model.

Experiments were conducted in accordance with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology and the NIH guidance for use of laboratory animals and approved by the institutional Animal Care Committee of Massachusetts Eye and Ear - Harvard Medical School. Mice (6 to 12 mo old) used included C57BL/6J (000664), B6.129(Cg)-Ccr2tm2.1lfc/J (017586), and B6.129P- Cx3cr1tm1Litt/J (005582) from The Jackson Laboratory. CCR2RFP/+::CX3CR1EGFP/+ mice were generated by crossing B6.129(Cg)-Ccr2tm2.1lfc/J with B6.129P- Cx3cr1tm1Litt/J. CX3CR1EGFP/+ mice were generated by crossing male B6.129P- Cx3cr1tm1Litt/J with female C57BL/6J. Mice were bred in-house. For microglia depletion, PLX5622 chow (Plexxikon Inc.) was administered for 3 wk. Flow cytometry and ex vivo BMDM evaluation were performed as previously described (8, 10). Blood cells were collected by cardiac puncture and centrifugation. Peritoneum-, lung-, liver-, spleen-, and femur-resident macrophages were evaluated using appropriate markers (16, 19) in BMT CX3CR1+/EGFP reporter mice following 3-wk exposure to PLX5622.

Flow Cytometry Markers.

Bone marrow and spleen cells from CX3CR1+/GFP and CX3CR1+/EGFP::CCR2+/RFP reporter mice were blocked with CD16/32 (clone: 2.4G2), analyzed with IL-1β (clone: NJTEN3), Lyve1 (clone: ALY7) (eBiosciences); CD45 (clone: 104), CD11b (clone: M1/70), CD11c (clone: N418), CD3 (clone: 17A2), CD4 (clone: GK1.5), CD8 (clone: 53-5.8), CD19 (clone: 6D5), CD117 (clone: 2B8), CD34 (clone: HM34), CD115 (clone: AFS98), CD64 (clone X54-5/7.1), Clec4f (clone 3E3F9), Tim-4 (clone RMT4-54), Siglec F (clone S17007L), PE Lineage mixture (catalog no. 133303), CD68 (clone: FA-11), CD206 (clone: C068C2), CCR2 (clone: SA203G11), BrdU(clone: Bu20a), F4/80 (clone: BM8), MerTK (clone: 2B10C42), CD11a (clone: I21/7), CD102 (clone: 3C4), CD106 (clone: 429), and I-A/I/E (clone: M5/114.15.2) (BioLegend). Intracellular staining was performed by fixing cells in paraformaldehyde-based fixation buffer (BioLegend) followed by permeabilization with Perm/Wash buffer (BioLegend). Cells were analyzed on a BD LSR II cytometer (BD Biosciences) using FlowJo software (Tree Star).

Lipopolysaccharide Stimulation Assay.

BMDMs were primed with 150 U/mL interferon (IFN)-γ (6 h) followed by 10 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 h. Brefeldin A (5 μg/mL) (BD Pharmingen) was added 4 h before flow cytometry.

Phagocytosis Assay.

The pHrodo Red BioParticles Conjugates for Phagocytosis (P35364; Molecular Probes) kit was used. Six days after cell plating with macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and 1 d prior to the assay, BMDMs were recovered from culture and seeded. Cells were stimulated with IFN-γ for 4 h and then culture medium was replaced with reconstituted red Zymosan A BioParticles. Cells were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h, trypsinized, and evaluated with flow cytometry.

Statistics.

Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism version 2.8.1 using two-tailed unpaired t test and ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was determined at P < 0.05.
  19 in total

1.  Three Unique Interstitial Macrophages in the Murine Lung at Steady State.

Authors:  Sophie L Gibbings; Stacey M Thomas; Shaikh M Atif; Alexandra L McCubbrey; A Nicole Desch; Thomas Danhorn; Sonia M Leach; Donna L Bratton; Peter M Henson; William J Janssen; Claudia V Jakubzick
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.914

2.  A critical role for microglia in maintaining vascular integrity in the hypoxic spinal cord.

Authors:  Sebok K Halder; Richard Milner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Gene-expression profiles and transcriptional regulatory pathways that underlie the identity and diversity of mouse tissue macrophages.

Authors:  Emmanuel L Gautier; Tal Shay; Jennifer Miller; Melanie Greter; Claudia Jakubzick; Stoyan Ivanov; Julie Helft; Andrew Chow; Kutlu G Elpek; Simon Gordonov; Amin R Mazloom; Avi Ma'ayan; Wei-Jen Chua; Ted H Hansen; Shannon J Turley; Miriam Merad; Gwendalyn J Randolph
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 25.606

4.  Microglia Are Irrelevant for Neuronal Degeneration and Axon Regeneration after Acute Injury.

Authors:  Alexander M Hilla; Heike Diekmann; Dietmar Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Two distinct interstitial macrophage populations coexist across tissues in specific subtissular niches.

Authors:  Svetoslav Chakarov; Hwee Ying Lim; Leonard Tan; Sheau Yng Lim; Peter See; Josephine Lum; Xiao-Meng Zhang; Shihui Foo; Satoshi Nakamizo; Kaibo Duan; Wan Ting Kong; Rebecca Gentek; Akhila Balachander; Daniel Carbajo; Camille Bleriot; Benoit Malleret; John Kit Chung Tam; Sonia Baig; Muhammad Shabeer; Sue-Anne Ee Shiow Toh; Andreas Schlitzer; Anis Larbi; Thomas Marichal; Bernard Malissen; Jinmiao Chen; Michael Poidinger; Kenji Kabashima; Marc Bajenoff; Lai Guan Ng; Veronique Angeli; Florent Ginhoux
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling is necessary for microglia viability, unmasking a microglia progenitor cell in the adult brain.

Authors:  Monica R P Elmore; Allison R Najafi; Maya A Koike; Nabil N Dagher; Elizabeth E Spangenberg; Rachel A Rice; Masashi Kitazawa; Bernice Matusow; Hoa Nguyen; Brian L West; Kim N Green
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Inhibition of CSF-1 receptor improves the antitumor efficacy of adoptive cell transfer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Stephen Mok; Richard C Koya; Christopher Tsui; Jingying Xu; Lídia Robert; Lily Wu; Thomas Graeber; Brian L West; Gideon Bollag; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibition prevents disruption of the blood-retina barrier during chronic inflammation.

Authors:  Despina Kokona; Andreas Ebneter; Pascal Escher; Martin S Zinkernagel
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 8.322

9.  Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibition prevents microglial plaque association and improves cognition in 3xTg-AD mice.

Authors:  Nabil N Dagher; Allison R Najafi; Kara M Neely Kayala; Monica R P Elmore; Terra E White; Rodrigo Medeiros; Brian L West; Kim N Green
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 8.322

10.  The Transcription Factor ZEB2 Is Required to Maintain the Tissue-Specific Identities of Macrophages.

Authors:  Charlotte L Scott; Wouter T'Jonck; Liesbet Martens; Helena Todorov; Dorine Sichien; Bieke Soen; Johnny Bonnardel; Sofie De Prijck; Niels Vandamme; Robrecht Cannoodt; Wouter Saelens; Bavo Vanneste; Wendy Toussaint; Pieter De Bleser; Nozomi Takahashi; Peter Vandenabeele; Sandrine Henri; Clare Pridans; David A Hume; Bart N Lambrecht; Patrick De Baetselier; Simon W F Milling; Jo A Van Ginderachter; Bernard Malissen; Geert Berx; Alain Beschin; Yvan Saeys; Martin Guilliams
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 31.745

View more
  66 in total

1.  Selective Ablation of BDNF from Microglia Reveals Novel Roles in Self-Renewal and Hippocampal Neurogenesis.

Authors:  Samuel B R Harley; Emily F Willis; Samreen N Shaikh; Daniel G Blackmore; Pankaj Sah; Marc J Ruitenberg; Perry F Bartlett; Jana Vukovic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Role of innate inflammation in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Sandrine Bourgeois-Tardif; Louis De Beaumont; José Carlos Rivera; Sylvain Chemtob; Alexander G Weil
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 3.  Microglia and monocytes in inflammatory CNS disease: integrating phenotype and function.

Authors:  Alanna G Spiteri; Claire L Wishart; Roger Pamphlett; Giuseppe Locatelli; Nicholas J C King
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 17.088

4.  Microglial depletion abolishes ischemic preconditioning in white matter.

Authors:  Margaret A Hamner; Ashley McDonough; Davin C Gong; Levi J Todd; German Rojas; Sibylle Hodecker; Christopher B Ransom; Thomas A Reh; Bruce R Ransom; Jonathan R Weinstein
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 7.452

Review 5.  Microglia and Stem-Cell Mediated Neuroprotection after Neonatal Hypoxia-Ischemia.

Authors:  Catherine Brégère; Bernd Schwendele; Boris Radanovic; Raphael Guzman
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 6.  Diversity and Function of Glial Cell Types in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Lucas Schirmer; Dorothy P Schafer; Theresa Bartels; David H Rowitch; Peter A Calabresi
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 7.  Small molecule therapeutics for neuroinflammation-mediated neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Silke Miller; Maria-Jesus Blanco
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2021-04-13

Review 8.  Pro-Tumorigenic Macrophage Infiltration in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Possible Macrophage-Aimed Therapeutic Interventions.

Authors:  Flavia Bruna; Pablo Scodeller
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Glial Cells Promote Myelin Formation and Elimination.

Authors:  Alexandria N Hughes
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-11

Review 10.  Macrophage reprogramming for therapy.

Authors:  Valentina M T Bart; Robert J Pickering; Philip R Taylor; Natacha Ipseiz
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 7.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.