Literature DB >> 32900604

Characterizing patient-oncologist communication in genomic tumor testing: The 21-gene recurrence score as an exemplar.

Suzanne C O'Neill1, Susan T Vadaparampil2, Richard L Street3, Tanina Foster Moore4, Claudine Isaacs5, Hyo S Han2, Bianca Augusto2, Jennifer Garcia2, Katherine Lopez5, Matilda Brilleman5, Jinani Jayasekera5, Susan Eggly4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Women with early-stage, ER + breast cancer are recommend to receive genomic profiling tests, such as the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) test, to guide treatment decisions. We examined test- and treatment-related information discussed and the associations between RS categories and aspects of communication during patient-oncologist clinical encounters.
METHODS: As part of a larger trial, clinical encounters (N = 46) were audiorecorded and coded for 1) RS- and treatment-related information, 2) shared decision making, 3) patient active participation, and 4) oncologist patient-centered communication. We examined differences by RS category using mixed models, adjusting for nesting within oncologist.
RESULTS: Patients with a high RS were more likely to receive a chemotherapy recommendation (p < .01), hear about the risks/side effects of chemotherapy (p < .01), and offer their preferences (p = .02) than those with intermediate or low RS. Elements of shared decision making increased with RS. Oncologist patient-centered communication (M = 4.09/5, SD = .25) and patient active participation (M = 3.5/4, SD = 1.0) were high across RS.
CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that disease severity, rather than clinical uncertainty, impact treatment recommendations and shared decision making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Oncologists adjust test- and treatment-related information and shared decision making by disease severity. This information provides a framework to inform decision making in complex cancer and genomics settings.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  21-gene; Breast cancer; Communication; Patient-clinician communication; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32900604      PMCID: PMC7854933          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  44 in total

1.  Using a 'talk' model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION 5 Item.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Maka Tsulukidze; Adrian Edwards; France Légaré; Robert Newcombe
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-27

2.  Randomized trial of a question prompt list to increase patient active participation during interactions with black patients and their oncologists.

Authors:  Susan Eggly; Lauren M Hamel; Tanina S Foster; Terrance L Albrecht; Robert Chapman; Felicity W K Harper; Hayley Thompson; Jennifer J Griggs; Richard Gonzalez; Lisa Berry-Bobovski; Rifky Tkatch; Michael Simon; Anthony Shields; Shirish Gadgeel; Randa Loutfi; Haythem Ali; Ira Wollner; Louis A Penner
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-12-27

3.  Adoption of Gene Expression Profiling for Breast Cancer in US Oncology Practice for Women Younger Than 65 Years.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Claudine Isaacs; Calvin Chao; Huei-Ting Tsai; Chunfu Liu; Bola F Ekezue; Nandini Selvam; Larry G Kessler; Marc D Schwartz; Tania Lobo; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Intended and unintended consequences: Ethics, communication, and prognostic disclosure in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Jonathan M Marron; Angel M Cronin; Tammy I Kang; Jennifer W Mack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Women's experiences with genomic testing for breast cancer recurrence risk.

Authors:  Janice P Tzeng; Deborah Mayer; Alice R Richman; Isaac Lipkus; Paul K Han; Carmina G Valle; Lisa A Carey; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis and survival.

Authors:  Meira Epplein; Ying Zheng; Wei Zheng; Zhi Chen; Kai Gu; David Penson; Wei Lu; Xiao-Ou Shu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  France Légaré; Holly O Witteman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision.

Authors:  Nancy K Janz; Patricia A Wren; Laurel A Copeland; Julie C Lowery; Sherry L Goldfarb; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Physicians' communication and perceptions of patients: is it how they look, how they talk, or is it just the doctor?

Authors:  Richard L Street; Howard Gordon; Paul Haidet
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 10.  Implementing and evaluating shared decision making in oncology practice.

Authors:  Heather L Kane; Michael T Halpern; Linda B Squiers; Katherine A Treiman; Lauren A McCormack
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.