Literature DB >> 20213682

Women's experiences with genomic testing for breast cancer recurrence risk.

Janice P Tzeng1, Deborah Mayer, Alice R Richman, Isaac Lipkus, Paul K Han, Carmina G Valle, Lisa A Carey, Noel T Brewer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined how patients understand and use genomic test results when deciding about treatment. This study examined how women receive and incorporate results of Oncotype DX, a genomic test that offers recurrence risk estimates, into decisions about adjuvant treatment for early stage breast cancer.
METHODS: Participants in the cross-sectional study were 77 women with early stage, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer with 0 to 3 positive lymph nodes who received Oncotype DX between 2004 and 2009. Mailed surveys, supplemented by medical chart review, assessed how women received and understood recurrence risk information based on the test.
RESULTS: The most common test results were low (50%, 34 of 68) or intermediate (37%, 25 of 68) breast cancer recurrence risk. Most women accurately recalled their recurrence risk based on the test (71%) and felt they understood much of what they were told about it (67%). Approximately 25% of women recalled experiencing test-related distress. Women's perceived recurrence risk was associated with their actual genomic-based recurrence risks, having had a previous cancer diagnosis, and worry about recurrence. Women with high recurrence risk typically had chemotherapy (78%, 7 of 9), whereas only 2 with a low recurrence risk did (7%, 2 of 30).
CONCLUSIONS: This is among the first studies to describe patients' experiences with genomic testing for recurrence risk. Although many women understood discussions about their genomic test results, a third reported not fully understanding these discussions, suggesting a need to aid and improve risk communication and treatment decision making. (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20213682     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

1.  Patients' understanding of how genotype variation affects benefits of tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  N T Brewer; J T Defrank; W K Chiu; J G Ibrahim; C M Walko; P Rubin; O A Olajide; S G Moore; R E Raab; D R Carrizosa; S W Corso; G Schwartz; J M Peppercorn; H L McLeod; L A Carey; W J Irvin
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Patients' perceptions of gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  Y Bombard; L Rozmovits; M E Trudeau; N B Leighl; K Deal; D A Marshall
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  The value of personalizing medicine: medical oncologists' views on gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Linda Rozmovits; Maureen Trudeau; Natasha B Leighl; Ken Deal; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-03-06

4.  Current Status and Future Opportunities in Lung Precision Medicine Research with a Focus on Biomarkers. An American Thoracic Society/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Research Statement.

Authors:  Ann Chen Wu; James P Kiley; Patricia J Noel; Shashi Amur; Esteban G Burchard; John P Clancy; Joshua Galanter; Maki Inada; Tiffanie K Jones; Jonathan A Kropski; James E Loyd; Lawrence M Nogee; Benjamin A Raby; Angela J Rogers; David A Schwartz; Don D Sin; Avrum Spira; Scott T Weiss; Lisa R Young; Blanca E Himes
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 5.  Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Sébastien Simard; Belinda Thewes; Gerry Humphris; Mélanie Dixon; Ceara Hayden; Shab Mireskandari; Gozde Ozakinci
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Improving communication of breast cancer recurrence risk.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Alice R Richman; Jessica T DeFrank; Valerie F Reyna; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Understanding how breast cancer patients use risk information from genomic tests.

Authors:  Jessica T DeFrank; Lisa A Carey; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-08-10

8.  Capacity building for assessing new technologies: approaches to examining personalized medicine in practice.

Authors:  Stephanie L Van Bebber; Julia R Trosman; Su-Ying Liang; Grace Wang; Deborah A Marshall; Sara Knight; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Attitudes of patients with cancer about personalized medicine and somatic genetic testing.

Authors:  Stacy W Gray; Katherine Hicks-Courant; Christopher S Lathan; Levi Garraway; Elyse R Park; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Engaging Patients in Precision Oncology: Development and Usability of a Web-Based Patient-Facing Genomic Sequencing Report.

Authors:  Ilana B Solomon; Sarah McGraw; Jenny Shen; Adem Albayrak; Gil Alterovitz; Melanie Davies; Catherine Del Vecchio Fitz; Rachel A Freedman; Lisa N Lopez; Lynette M Sholl; Eliezer Van Allen; Joanne Mortimer; Marwan Fakih; Sumanta Pal; Karen L Reckamp; Yuan Yuan; Stacy W Gray
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.