Literature DB >> 32900561

Tumor Control Probability Modeling and Systematic Review of the Literature of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Trevor J Royce1, Panayiotis Mavroidis2, Kyle Wang2, Aaron D Falchook3, Nathan C Sheets2, Donald B Fuller4, Sean P Collins5, Issam El Naqa6, Daniel Y Song7, George X Ding8, Alan E Nahum9, Andrew Jackson10, Jimm Grimm11, Ellen Yorke10, Ronald C Chen12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dose escalation improves localized prostate cancer disease control, and moderately hypofractionated external beam radiation is noninferior to conventional fractionation. The evolving treatment approach of ultrahypofractionation with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows possible further biological dose escalation (biologically equivalent dose [BED]) and shortened treatment time. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Biological Effects of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy/SBRT included a subgroup to study the prostate tumor control probability (TCP) with SBRT. We performed a systematic review of the available literature and created a dose-response TCP model for the endpoint of freedom from biochemical relapse. Results were stratified by prostate cancer risk group.
RESULTS: Twenty-five published cohorts were identified for inclusion, with a total of 4821 patients (2235 with low-risk, 1894 with intermediate-risk, and 446 with high-risk disease, when reported) treated with a variety of dose/fractionation schemes, permitting dose-response modeling. Five studies had a median follow-up of more than 5 years. Dosing regimens ranged from 32 to 50 Gy in 4 to 5 fractions, with total BED (α/β = 1.5 Gy) between 183.1 and 383.3 Gy. At 5 years, we found that in patients with low-intermediate risk disease, an equivalent doses of 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2) of 71 Gy (31.7 Gy in 5 fractions) achieved a TCP of 90% and an EQD2 of 90 Gy (36.1 Gy in 5 fractions) achieved a TCP of 95%. In patients with high-risk disease, an EQD2 of 97 Gy (37.6 Gy in 5 fractions) can achieve a TCP of 90% and an EQD2 of 102 Gy (38.7 Gy in 5 fractions) can achieve a TCP of 95%.
CONCLUSIONS: We found significant variation in the published literature on target delineation, margins used, dose/fractionation, and treatment schedule. Despite this variation, TCP was excellent. Most prescription doses range from 35 to 40 Gy, delivered in 4 to 5 fractions. The literature did not provide detailed dose-volume data, and our dosimetric analysis was constrained to prescription doses. There are many areas in need of continued research as SBRT continues to evolve as a treatment modality for prostate cancer, including the durability of local control with longer follow-up across risk groups, the efficacy and safety of SBRT as a boost to intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and the impact of incorporating novel imaging techniques into treatment planning.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32900561      PMCID: PMC9445430          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   8.013


  70 in total

1.  Making Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer More Economical and More Convenient.

Authors:  Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Prostate volume estimations using magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound compared to radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Nicholas R Paterson; Luke T Lavallée; Laura N Nguyen; Kelsey Witiuk; James Ross; Ranjeeta Mallick; Wael Shabana; Blair MacDonald; Nicola Scheida; Dean Fergusson; Franco Momoli; Sonya Cnossen; Christopher Morash; Ilias Cagiannos; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: final results of phase III randomized trial.

Authors:  Eric E Yeoh; Rochelle J Botten; Julie Butters; Addolorata C Di Matteo; Richard H Holloway; Jack Fowler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Long-term outcomes from a prospective trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher R King; James D Brooks; Harcharan Gill; Joseph C Presti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from proton radiation oncology group/american college of radiology 95-09.

Authors:  Anthony L Zietman; Kyounghwa Bae; Jerry D Slater; William U Shipley; Jason A Efstathiou; John J Coen; David A Bush; Margie Lunt; Daphna Y Spiegel; Rafi Skowronski; B Rodney Jabola; Carl J Rossi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Tumour and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery.

Authors:  P Källman; A Agren; A Brahme
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Prostate specific antigen bounce phenomenon after external beam radiation for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Rosser; Deborah A Kuban; Lawrence B Levy; Ramsey Chichakli; Alan Pollack; Andrew K Lee; Louis L Pisters
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Randomized Phase III Noninferiority Study Comparing Two Radiotherapy Fractionation Schedules in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  W Robert Lee; James J Dignam; Mahul B Amin; Deborah W Bruner; Daniel Low; Gregory P Swanson; Amit B Shah; David P D'Souza; Jeff M Michalski; Ian S Dayes; Samantha A Seaward; William A Hall; Paul L Nguyen; Thomas M Pisansky; Sergio L Faria; Yuhchyau Chen; Bridget F Koontz; Rebecca Paulus; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Virtual HDR CyberKnife SBRT for Localized Prostatic Carcinoma: 5-Year Disease-Free Survival and Toxicity Observations.

Authors:  Donald Blake Fuller; John Naitoh; George Mardirossian
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Escalated-dose versus control-dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: long-term results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David P Dearnaley; Gordana Jovic; Isabel Syndikus; Vincent Khoo; Richard A Cowan; John D Graham; Edwin G Aird; David Bottomley; Robert A Huddart; Chakiath C Jose; John H L Matthews; Jeremy L Millar; Claire Murphy; J Martin Russell; Christopher D Scrase; Mahesh K B Parmar; Matthew R Sydes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  7 in total

1.  Current usage of stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer in Korea: patterns of care survey (KROG 19-08).

Authors:  Sun Hyun Bae; Won Il Jang; Hyun-Cheol Kang; Young Il Kim; Yong Ho Kim; Woo Chul Kim; Hee Kwan Lee; Jin Ho Kim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-08

Review 2.  Stereotactic Radiation Therapy versus Brachytherapy: Relative Strengths of Two Highly Efficient Options for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Manon Kissel; Gilles Créhange; Pierre Graff
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  SBRT for Localized Prostate Cancer: CyberKnife vs. VMAT-FFF, a Dosimetric Study.

Authors:  Marcello Serra; Fortuna De Martino; Federica Savino; Valentina D'Alesio; Cecilia Arrichiello; Maria Quarto; Filomena Loffredo; Rossella Di Franco; Valentina Borzillo; Matteo Muto; Gianluca Ametrano; Paolo Muto
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-10

4.  Prospective validation of stringent dose constraints for prostatic stereotactic radiation monotherapy: results of a single-arm phase II toxicity-oriented trial.

Authors:  Paul Nguyen; Ludovic Harzée; Paul Retif; Stéphane Joseph; Guillaume Vogin; Philippe Nickers
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy versus Conventional to Moderate Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hideya Yamazaki; Gen Suzuki; Norihiro Aibe; Daisuke Shimizu; Takuya Kimoto; Koji Masui; Ken Yoshida; Satoaki Nakamura; Yasutoshi Hashimoto; Haruumi Okabe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Rationale for Utilization of Hydrogel Rectal Spacers in Dose Escalated SBRT for the Treatment of Unfavorable Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael C Repka; Michael Creswell; Jonathan W Lischalk; Michael Carrasquilla; Matthew Forsthoefel; Jacqueline Lee; Siyuan Lei; Nima Aghdam; Shaan Kataria; Olusola Obayomi-Davies; Brian T Collins; Simeng Suy; Ryan A Hankins; Sean P Collins
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hideya Yamazaki; Koji Masui; Gen Suzuki; Norihiro Aibe; Daisuke Shimizu; Takuya Kimoto; Kei Yamada; Akihisa Ueno; Toru Matsugasumi; Yasuhiro Yamada; Takumi Shiraishi; Atsuko Fujihara; Ken Yoshida; Satoaki Nakamura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.