Literature DB >> 32900546

Validity and Reliability of Smartphones in Assessing Spinal Kinematics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Juliana A Sedrez1, Tassia S Furlanetto2, Grazielle M Gelain2, Claudia T Candotti2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Advances in mobile technology have led to the development of smartphones, whose applications present numerous utilities, such as the analysis of human movement based on inertial sensors. The purpose of this review was to investigate validity and reliability of smartphones in assessing the kinematics of the human spine.
METHODS: A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and LILACS databases, as well as manual searches. The included studies evaluated psychometric properties of smartphones in assessing kinematic variables of the spine (range of motion [ROM], speed, and acceleration). Two independent reviewers performed the selection, reading, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment of the studies.
RESULTS: Of the 2651 articles initially found, 9 were included and had their results for ROM analyzed. The meta-analyses for validity showed very high correlation coefficients in the evaluation of cervical flexion, extension, and lateral flexion; high ones in the evaluation of cervical rotation; and also high ones for intrarater and interrater reproducibility of all cervical movements. The meta-analyses for interrater reproducibility showed high correlation coefficients in the evaluation of lumbar flexion and very high ones for intrarater reproducibility.
CONCLUSION: The use of smartphones for assessing the ROM of cervical flexion, extension, and lateral flexion and lumbar flexion is feasible. Their use for assessing thoracic rotation is potentially viable, but further validation studies are still needed to ensure a safe use. There is a lack of validation studies that evaluate the applicability of this device in assessing other kinematic characteristics, such as speed and acceleration.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-Analysis; Range of Motion, Articular; Reproducibility of Results; Smartphone

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32900546     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  2 in total

1.  Interexaminer Reliability and Validity of Quantity of Cervical Mobility during Online Dynamic Inspection.

Authors:  Leire Leonet-Tijero; Jaime Corral-de-Toro; Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Mar Hernández-Secorún; Hugo Abenia-Benedí; María Orosia Lucha-López; Sofía Monti-Ballano; Julián Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte; Héctor Tricás-Vidal; César Hidalgo-García; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21

2.  Measurement properties of smartphone applications for the measurement of neck range of motion: a systematic review and meta analyses.

Authors:  E Elgueta-Cancino; K Rice; D Abichandani; D Falla
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.