| Literature DB >> 32898867 |
Najla A Alqahtani1, Rafi A Togoo1, Mashael M Alqahtani1, Nouf S Suliman1, Foziah A Alasmari1, Faris M Alqahtani1, Fahad T Alshahrani1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The current research was conducted to evaluate the frequency of color-vision deficiency among dental students of King Khalid University College of Dentistry, Saudi Arabia.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32898867 PMCID: PMC7902095 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714766
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Dent
Comparison of normal and red-green color deficiency based on gender
| Crosstab | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red-green color deficiency | Total | ||||
| Normal | Present | ||||
|
Note: statistically significant (
| |||||
| Gender | Male | Count | 62 | 41 | 103 |
| % within Gender | 60.2% | 39.8% | 100.0% | ||
| Female | Count | 97 | 3 | 100 | |
| % within Gender | 97.0% | 3.0% | 100.0% | ||
| Total | Count | 159 | 44 | 203 | |
| % within Gender | 78.3% | 21.7% | 100.0% | ||
Comparison of normal and total color-vision deficiency based on gender
| Crosstab | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total color-vision deficiency | Total | ||||
| Normal | Present | ||||
|
Note: statistically non-significant;
| |||||
| Gender | Male | Count | 101 | 2 | 103 |
| % within Gender | 98.1% | 1.9% | 100.0% | ||
| Female | Count | 94 | 6 | 100 | |
| % within Gender | 94.0% | 6.0% | 100.0% | ||
| Total | Count | 195 | 8 | 203 | |
| % within Gender | 96.1% | 3.9% | 100.0% | ||
Comparison of frequency distribution of color-vision deficiency and normal based on age
| Crosstab | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | Total | ||||
| Deficient | Normal | ||||
|
Note: statistically significant;
| |||||
| Age category | 20–22 years | Count | 1 | 65 | 66 |
| % within age category | 1.5% | 98.5% | 100.0% | ||
| 23–25 years | Count | 2 | 132 | 134 | |
| % within age category | 1.5% | 98.5% | 100.0% | ||
| 26–28 years | Count | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| % within age category | 33.3% | 66.7% | 100.0% | ||
| Total | Count | 4 | 199 | 203 | |
| % within age category | 2.0% | 98.0% | 100.0% | ||
Comparison between normal and protanopia patients based on age
| Crosstab | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protanopia | Total | ||||
| Normal vision | Protanopia | ||||
|
Note: statistically significant;
| |||||
| Age category | 20–22 years | Count | 65 | 1 | 66 |
| % within age category | 98.5% | 1.5% | 100.0% | ||
| 23–25 years | Count | 132 | 2 | 134 | |
| % within age category | 98.5% | 1.5% | 100.0% | ||
| 26–28 years | Count | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| % within age category | 66.7% | 33.3% | 100.0% | ||
| Total | Count | 199 | 4 | 203 | |
| % within age category | 98.0% | 2.0% | 100.0% | ||
Comparison of frequency distribution of red-green deficiency and normal deficiency based on age
| Crosstab | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red-green color deficiency | Total | ||||
| Normal | Present | ||||
|
Note: statistically significant;
| |||||
| Age category | 20–22 years | Count | 64 | 2 | 66 |
| % within age category | 97.0% | 3.0% | 100.0% | ||
| 23–25 years | Count | 93 | 41 | 134 | |
| % within age category | 69.4% | 30.6% | 100.0% | ||
| 26–28 years | Count | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| % within age category | 66.7% | 33.3% | 100.0% | ||
| Total | Count | 159 | 44 | 203 | |
| % within age category | 78.3% | 21.7% | 100.0% | ||
Age versus total color vision deficiency
| Crosstab | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total color-vision deficiency | Total | ||||
| Normal | Present | ||||
|
Note: statistically significant (
| |||||
| Age category | 20–22 years | Count | 63 | 3 | 66 |
| % within age category | 95.5% | 4.5% | 100.0% | ||
| 23–25 years | Count | 130 | 4 | 134 | |
| % within age category | 97.0% | 3.0% | 100.0% | ||
| 26–28 years | Count | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| % within age category | 66.7% | 33.3% | 100.0% | ||
| Total | Count | 195 | 8 | 203 | |
| % within age category | 96.1% | 3.9% | 100.0% | ||